Council cleared the way for a coffee shop at 6130 Massachusetts Avenue, approving land use and rezoning changes, plus $61,802 for police laptops and $100,000 in grant-funded Skydio drones.
21 items on the agenda · 17 decisions recorded
On the agenda
- 6Vox Pop for Items Not Listed on the Agenda or Listed on Consent Agenda▶ 2:30
- 7.a
Purchases/Payments for City Council Approval
approvedon consentCouncil considered the routine list of purchases and payments requiring council approval. A motion to approve was made and seconded.
- motion:Motion to approve the purchases/payments for City Council approval. (passed)
▶ Jump to 15:43 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:15:43] Over approval. I'll second.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 7.b
Library Advisory Board Minutes - September 2025
approvedon consentCouncil approved the Library Advisory Board minutes from September 2025 as part of routine consent.
- motion:Motion to approve the Library Advisory Board minutes for September 2025. (passed)
▶ Jump to 15:43 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:15:43] Over approval. I'll second.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 7.c
Cultural Affairs Committee Meeting Minutes - September 2025
approvedon consentCouncil moved to approve the Cultural Affairs Committee Meeting Minutes from September 2025 as part of the consent agenda.
- motion:Approve the September 2025 Cultural Affairs Committee Meeting Minutes. (passed)
▶ Jump to 15:43 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:15:43] Over approval. I'll second.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 8.a
Second Reading, Ordinance No. 2025-2337: Land Use Amendment from Residential/Office (R/O) to General Commercial (CG) for 6130 Massachusetts Avenue
approvedCouncil held the second reading of Ordinance 2025-2337, a small-scale future land use map amendment changing approximately 0.7 acres at 6130 Massachusetts Avenue (southeast corner of Massachusetts and Forest Avenues) from Residential/Office (R/O) to General Commercial (CG). With no public comment, the ordinance passed 5-0.
Ord. Ordinance No. 2025-2337
- motion:Motion to approve second reading of Ordinance 2025-2337, amending the future land use map from Residential/Office to General Commercial for 6130 Massachusetts Avenue. (passed)5–0
6130 Massachusetts AvenueMattMr. HallMs. MancePatelPeteComprehensive PlanDRCFuture Land Use Map AmendmentLDRBOrdinance No. 2025-2337▶ Jump to 15:50 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:15:50] Public reading of ordinance number A, second reading of the ordinance, number 2025-2337, [00:15:57] land use amendment for a residential office to commercial for 6130 Massachusetts Avenue. [00:16:05] This is ordinance number 2025-2337, an ordinance of the city of New Port Richey, Florida, providing [00:16:10] for a small scale amendment of the future land use map of the city's adopted comprehensive [00:16:15] plan, providing for a change in the future land use designation for approximately .7 [00:16:20] acres of property generally located at the southeast corner of Massachusetts Avenue and [00:16:24] Forest Avenue, as shown on the map attached here to Exhibit A and legally described herein. [00:16:30] Providing for the amendment of the future land use designation for said property from [00:16:34] residential office RO to general commercial CG, providing for conflict, severability and [00:16:39] an effective date. [00:16:42] As indicated by the city attorney, the application is to amend the future land use map. The property [00:16:50] is located at the southeast corner of Massachusetts and Forest Avenue. Mr. Hall, would you have [00:16:57] some additional comments on this agenda item? [00:17:00] Certainly, Ms. Mance. This presentation and the one following are on the same property. [00:17:06] This land use amendment is for, again, amending the future land use map from RO to CG, and [00:17:14] the DRC and the LDRB found that the future land use map amendment from RO to CG would [00:17:20] be consistent and compatible with the city's adopted comprehensive plan and future land [00:17:24] use map, and the first reading was approved by City Council on October 21st. The request [00:17:31] was properly advertised and I'd be available for any questions you may have. [00:17:36] Do you have any public comment? Seeing no one come forward, bring it back for discussion [00:17:41] and vote. [00:17:43] Move to approve. [00:17:46] Second. [00:17:49] Okay, to the maker. [00:17:51] No, I'm good. [00:17:52] Pete? [00:17:53] No, I'm good. [00:17:54] Matt? [00:17:55] I'm good. [00:17:56] Patel? [00:17:57] Nothing has changed, so I'm good. [00:17:58] All those in favor, signify by aye. Aye. [00:18:02] Opposed? That's 5-0.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 8.b
Second Reading, Ordinance No. 2025-2338: Rezoning from Multi-Family High Density Residential (MF-30) to General Commercial (C-2) for 6130 Massachusetts Avenue
approvedSecond reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 2025-2338, rezoning approximately 0.7 acres at 6130 Massachusetts Avenue (southeast corner of Massachusetts and Forest Avenue) from Multi-Family High-Density Residential (MF-30) to General Commercial (C-2) to allow a coffee shop with drive-through at the former florist shop site. Passed 5-0 with no public comment.
Ord. Ordinance No. 2025-2338
- motion:Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2025-2338 rezoning 6130 Massachusetts Avenue from MF-30 to C-2. (passed)5–0
▶ Jump to 18:05 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:18:05] Second reading of Ordinance Number 2025-2338, Rezoning of Multi-Family High-Density Residential [00:18:13] to General Commercial for 6130 Massachusetts Avenue. [00:18:19] This is Ordinance Number 2025-2338, an ordinance of the City of New Port Richey, Florida, providing [00:18:24] for amendment of the Land Development Code Zoning District Map, providing for rezoning [00:18:28] of approximately 0.7 acres of property generally located at the southeast corner of Massachusetts [00:18:33] Avenue and Forest Avenue, and legally described herein, providing for amendment of the Zoning [00:18:38] District Designation for said property from the Multi-Family High-Density District MF30 [00:18:44] Zoning District to the General Commercial C2 Zoning District, providing for conflict, [00:18:49] severability, and an effective date. [00:18:52] As indicated by Mr. Hall, this is a companion application to rezone the property, and as [00:19:01] I'm sure you recall from the discussion that took place at your last meeting, the purpose [00:19:06] of which is to establish a coffee shop with a drive-through facility at the location of [00:19:13] the former florist shop. [00:19:15] Mr. Hall? [00:19:16] Any public comment? [00:19:19] Seeing no one come forward, we'll bring it back for discussion and vote. [00:19:23] I move to approve. [00:19:24] Second. [00:19:25] Tim Aker? [00:19:26] No, I'm good. [00:19:27] Tim, second? [00:19:28] I like it. [00:19:29] Bertel? [00:19:30] I like it. [00:19:31] Pete? [00:19:32] I'm good as well, sir. [00:19:33] All those in favor, signify by saying aye. [00:19:35] Aye. [00:19:36] That's 5-0.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.a
Request to Lease Dell Rugged Laptops for Police Units
approvedCouncil approved a three-year lease agreement with Dell Financial Services for 20 Dell rugged laptops for police patrol units, replacing end-of-life Panasonic units. Total cost is $61,802.04, with an option to buy for $1 at the end of the lease, procured through reseller Computers at Work under the NASPO contract.
- motion:Approve entering into a three-year lease agreement with Dell Financial Services for 20 Dell rugged laptops for police patrol units at a total cost of $61,802.04. (passed)
Computers at WorkDellDell Financial ServicesPanasonicChief CochranMahavioPatel$61,802.04 total costNASPO contractThree-year Dell lease agreement▶ Jump to 19:37 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:19:37] Request for a leased Dell rugged laptop for police units. [00:19:42] It sounds like a doll, baby doll or something. [00:19:46] Go ahead. [00:19:47] It's a request to enter into a three-year lease agreement, and Chief Cochran will present. [00:19:55] It is Mahavio's agenda item, and she'll present it. [00:20:00] Thank you. [00:20:01] Mayor, City Council, and City Managers, we're requesting this evening approval to enter [00:20:06] into a lease agreement with Dell for the lease of 20 Dell rugged laptops for our police patrol [00:20:13] units via our business partner or reseller Computers at Work under the NASPO contract. [00:20:19] However, the lease agreement will be with Dell. [00:20:22] Our current Panasonic rugged laptops have reached end of life and are due for replacement. [00:20:27] This will also, just to summarize, it'll be a three-year agreement or lease agreement [00:20:32] with an option to buy for a dollar at the end of the lease should we choose. [00:20:36] Total cost, $61,802.04. [00:20:40] Again, changing to a leasing structure as this will allow us to replace these systems [00:20:44] on a three every three years instead of trying to extend the life of these out five to six [00:20:49] years, and then also allows us to budget throughout the three-year term versus having [00:20:55] to expense that up front. [00:20:57] We do recommend approval to enter into the three-year lease agreement with Dell Financial [00:21:02] Services, and I'm available to answer any questions. [00:21:06] Comment? [00:21:08] Seeing no one come forward, we'll bring it back for discussion and vote. [00:21:12] I'll make approval. [00:21:14] Motion? [00:21:17] It made me think if the rugged Dell was a doll, it would probably be a G.I. [00:21:22] Joe is what I'm thinking. [00:21:25] Second? [00:21:26] I'm good. [00:21:27] Patel? [00:21:28] All good. [00:21:33] Yeah, and I like the idea that possibly I think keeps everything up to date if we continue [00:21:38] to lease as fast as things are changing nowadays. [00:21:42] All those in favor signify by aye. [00:21:44] Aye. [00:21:45] Aye. [00:21:46] Opposed? [00:21:47] Hearing none, nothing.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.b
Approve Axon Enterprises Agreement for Purchase of Drones w/Funding from the FDLE Drone Replacement Program Financial Assistance Agreement
approvedCouncil approved a one-year agreement with Axon Enterprises to purchase four rugged Skydio drones with accessories for $100,000, funded by an FDLE Drone Replacement Program grant approved October 7, 2025. The drones will integrate the Police Department with the Pasco County Unmanned Systems Task Force.
- motion:Approve one-year agreement with Axon Enterprises to purchase four Skydio drones for $100,000 using FDLE grant funding under sourcewell contract 101-223-AXN. (passed)
Axon EnterprisesPasco County Unmanned Systems Task ForceChief KochanMs. MannsFDLE Drone Replacement Program Financial Assistance AgreementFY 2026 Police Department budget special purpose equipment 6431Sourcewell contract 101-223-AXN▶ Jump to 21:48 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:21:48] Approval of Axon Enterprises Agreement for purchase of drones with funding from FDLE, [00:21:53] Drone Replacement Program Financial Assistance Agreement. [00:21:57] This agenda item will be presented by Chief Kochan. [00:22:00] Thank you, Ms. Manns. [00:22:01] Honorable Mayor, Council Members, I request for City Councils to approve a one-year agreement [00:22:05] with Axon Enterprises to purchase four rugged SkidDO drones with accessories for $100,000 [00:22:12] under sourceful contract 101-223-AXN with funding from the FDLE grant. [00:22:18] As Council may remember, we approved this grant on October 7, 2025. [00:22:23] This is really big for the Police Department because now we will be fully integrated with [00:22:28] Pasco County Unmanned Systems Task Force. [00:22:31] They will be out for every event that's upcoming. [00:22:33] We will also be utilizing these drones with them to augment their resources. [00:22:39] We currently have four officers that are FAA certified to operate these drones with [00:22:43] four more going through the online training to receive their licenses. [00:22:47] So the goal would be ultimately to get 10 that will be able to fly these drones. [00:22:52] City Attorney has reviewed the agreement with Axon and approved it as to form. [00:22:56] Staff recommends that City Council approve this one-year agreement with Axon to purchase [00:23:01] four SkidDO drones in the amount of $100,000. [00:23:04] And again, we're piggybacking off of sourceful contract 101-223-AXN. [00:23:09] And the funding has been allocated in the Police Department's FY 2026 budget [00:23:14] and special purpose equipment for 6431, $100,000. [00:23:18] I'm here to answer any questions you may have. [00:23:21] Any public comment? [00:23:23] Seeing no one come forward, bring her back for discussion and vote. [00:23:26] I'll second. [00:23:27] To the maker? [00:23:28] Yes, sir. [00:23:29] Second. [00:23:30] Just happy to get this going after what I saw with the county's drone system. [00:23:34] So very excited. [00:23:35] Thank you, Chief, for the work. [00:23:40] New world out there, isn't it? [00:23:41] Yeah. [00:23:42] I mean, no secrets. [00:23:44] Keep on a larger view than my set of eyes, that's for sure. [00:23:48] All those in favor, signify by aye. [00:23:50] Aye. [00:23:51] Aye.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.c
You arrived here from a search for “Mr. Rivera” — transcript expanded below
Request to Purchase Stationary Auxiliary Power Generator for Frances Avenue Lift Station
approvedCouncil approved a proposal from Mid-Florida Diesel for purchase of a stationary auxiliary power generator for the Frances Avenue lift station, in an amount not to exceed $49,995, priced under the current sheriff's contract. The purchase supports resiliency upgrades identified in the city's 2011 and 2022 utility system master plans, and the generator will be elevated to mitigate flooding.
- motion:Approve the proposal from Mid-Florida Diesel for purchase of a stationary auxiliary power generator for the Frances Avenue lift station, not to exceed $49,995. (passed)
Frances Avenue lift stationGulf DriveMain StreetNebraska AvenueUS-19Duke EnergyMid-Florida DieselBrianMattMr. RiveraMs. MancePete2011 Utility System Master Plan2022 Utility System Master PlanSCADA system upgradeSewer collections division fundingSheriff's contract (cooperative purchasing)▶ Jump to 23:52 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:23:52] That's five-nothing. [00:23:53] Request for purchase of stationary auxiliary power generator for Francis Avenue lift station. [00:24:00] The request is to approve a proposal from Mid-Florida Diesel [00:24:06] for the purchase of the stationary auxiliary power generator. [00:24:12] And Mr. Rivera will present the agenda item. [00:24:15] Thank you, Ms. Mance. [00:24:17] The proposal that is attached before you is in the amount not to exceed $49,995. [00:24:25] The pricing is in accordance with the current sheriff's contract that's associated with this type of equipment. [00:24:32] The city's 2011 utility system master plan, as well as its 2022, [00:24:39] indicated that the southeast corner or area of the city was in need of upgrades, [00:24:47] improvements to the sewer system in that area. [00:24:51] It had called out that the upgrades to two lift stations, [00:24:54] the master station on Nebraska Avenue downtown, [00:24:57] as well as the Francis Avenue lift station were part of those elements, [00:25:01] as well as the upsizing of the force main system that tied those two existing lift stations together. [00:25:09] It also called for the diversion of those flows to kind of help with the hydraulics of the system. [00:25:17] And so some of those flows we wanted to take away from the Nebraska Avenue lift station [00:25:22] and take and send them down Gulf Drive over to US-19, [00:25:27] where our wastewater treatment plant is located off of Main Street. [00:25:31] And so one of the elements that was included in this was looking at auxiliary power to where, [00:25:39] how could we take some of these large lift stations in our system, be able to keep those operational, [00:25:45] whether we had power outages for whatever reason, [00:25:49] or when we had storm events when Duke Energy would shut the power down, [00:25:54] we'd be able to maintain as long as our system could handle it. [00:25:57] The other benefit that it would afford the system is that once we ended up getting everything up and running [00:26:05] and all your stormwater had, tides had all gone down, [00:26:09] we'd be able to control our destiny as far as trying to get some of our systems up, [00:26:14] up and running to where we could keep some of those flows moving. [00:26:18] And so the level of service we would expect would be greatly improved. [00:26:22] This request that we've got before you is for us to go ahead and outright pay for the generator, [00:26:28] and we can go ahead and get that installed. [00:26:30] But we just also wanted to let you know that we also have applied for several grants [00:26:35] that we can put some of these stationary power generators at some of the other lift stations that we have [00:26:41] as we move forward that had gotten inundated as well. [00:26:44] So it's just those resiliency items that we're taking a look at that are out there [00:26:49] and that are available for us now. [00:26:53] The purchasing and the allocation of funds was identified in the sewer collections division, [00:26:59] and we would recommend that you do approve the purchase. [00:27:04] Any public comment? [00:27:07] Seeing no one come forward, bring it back for discussion and vote. [00:27:11] Move approval. [00:27:12] Second. [00:27:14] Increasing our resiliency, and it's an important purchase. [00:27:19] Second. [00:27:20] Just to say I know there's been a couple conversations from the public about resiliency around these lift stations, [00:27:28] and it's my understanding, based on what you described, that this will enhance the resiliency of the lift stations. [00:27:34] But then for the generator itself, can you just speak to, like, flood mitigation? [00:27:40] I know there are some questions about some of our infrastructure being low-lying. [00:27:45] Can you just speak to that? [00:27:46] Well, some of the projects that we've completed, especially with the Francis Avenue lift station, [00:27:53] in addition to upsizing and the components updating the SCADA system that we have there, [00:28:01] we're able to take a low-lying area and bring all of our equipment up to an acceptable level [00:28:07] to where we can meet some of these flooding events that are expected to happen quite consistently every season. [00:28:17] And so the generator itself, there is funds that will include elevating that generator as well, [00:28:24] so that while it may be surrounded by water, once that water recedes, [00:28:29] we'll be able to go ahead and get everything up and running. [00:28:32] And because it is what I would call a master station, then it helps with some of the flows [00:28:38] to where if we've got that running, now we can go downstream, so to speak, [00:28:42] start working on those other lift stations to get those in as part of the system to get it moving. [00:28:48] Good info. Thank you. [00:28:50] Matt? [00:28:51] No, I'm good. It looks good. [00:28:53] Brian? [00:28:54] No, I think it looks good. [00:28:56] All those in favor, signify by aye. [00:28:58] Aye. [00:29:00] I believe that you said yes, Pete. [00:29:03] Pardon me? I missed yours. Sorry. [00:29:05] Recommend for cultural affairs event, the Polar Express. [00:29:11] The recommendation before you this evening from the Cultural Affairs Committee is to approve funding in the amount of $700, [00:29:22] and Mrs. Feigart will present the recommendation to you.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.d
Recommendation of Cultural Event: The Polar Express Experience
approvedCouncil approved $700 in funding from the Cultural Affairs events budget line to support the Polar Express Experience, a free family-friendly holiday event hosted by the Richey Suncoast Theater on December 14th at 4 p.m. The event includes live storytelling, a film showing, music, refreshments, and free photos with Santa. The Cultural Affairs Committee unanimously recommended the funding.
- motion:Motion to approve the $700 funding request for the Polar Express Experience at the Richey Suncoast Theater. (passed)5–0
Richey Suncoast TheaterSusie SachsCultural Affairs CommitteeFY 25-26 budget line 44810 Cultural Affairs eventsPolar Express Experience▶ Jump to 29:23 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:29:32] Good evening, City Council. [00:29:34] Is the mic working? [00:29:41] Hello? [00:29:44] Much better. [00:29:47] Good evening again, City Council. [00:29:50] For your consideration tonight is a proposal for funding in the amount of $700 to support the Polar Express. [00:30:00] experience, a family-friendly holiday program proposed by the Ritchie Suncoast [00:30:06] Theater. This event was first introduced at the Cultural Affairs Committee's [00:30:10] October 14th meeting by member Susie Sachs. Following strong interest from the [00:30:18] committee, a full proposal was presented at the following meeting on November the [00:30:23] 6th. The event itself is designated to celebrate an intergenerational holiday [00:30:30] tradition through live storytelling from library staff, a showing of the film, and [00:30:37] seasonal music, cookies, hot chocolate, and culminating with a specialty [00:30:42] scheduled visit from the North Pole's top executive. The committee unanimously [00:30:49] recommended council consider funding this request in its entirety, recognizing [00:30:54] that the program promotes the arts through storytelling, film, and music. It [00:31:01] should be noted that Ms. Sachs did recuse herself from this vote as she is [00:31:06] also an employee of the Ritchie Suncoast Theater, and if approved, the Polar [00:31:12] Express experience will take place on December 14th starting at 4 p.m. at the [00:31:18] Ritchie Suncoast Theater. Funding in the amount of $700 is available in the [00:31:24] fiscal year 25-26 City Council budget under the line item ending in 44810 [00:31:31] Cultural Affairs events. Members of the committee are present tonight at this [00:31:37] meeting, and either I or they are available if you should have any [00:31:42] questions. Do we have any public comment from the committee? [00:31:54] Good evening everyone. My name is Susie Sachs. I am a member of the [00:32:08] Cultural Affairs Committee and also the executive director of the Ritchie [00:32:11] Suncoast Theater. As stated, I did recuse myself from the vote, so I am coming [00:32:16] here as a member of the community. I did bring for your viewing the flyer of [00:32:24] the Ritchie Suncoast Theater. Is the flyer available? Am I able to pass? [00:32:37] We at the theater as well as in the Cultural Affairs Committee feel that [00:32:41] this is a great experience for the members of New Port Richey and feel of [00:32:47] this being a family-friendly experience. It does help to promote the families to [00:32:52] come out at Christmas as well as bring a sense of unity for the families. Like [00:32:58] she said, it is multi-generational because we are going to be doing a [00:33:00] reading of a storybook and having the movie and of course, you know, the big man [00:33:07] himself will be coming for free photographs as well. So this allows for [00:33:12] people of all income ranges to come and enjoy the experience. The funding given [00:33:17] by the city would allow this to be a free event for all. So the cookies are [00:33:21] free, the hot choco is free, the pictures with Santa Claus are free, the movie is [00:33:26] free. So we wanted to bring that to your pleasure, please. I have one question. [00:33:32] You have a capacity of 300, right? 326. Fine-tune me on that. Do you think you're [00:33:39] going to have a problem with the amount of people that want to come to something [00:33:43] like this? That would be an amazing experience if we did. So we don't know [00:33:47] because it's the first time we've done it. But you know, if we did, we would do [00:33:51] our best within the rules that the fire company doesn't yell at us to make sure [00:33:56] that everyone is accommodated. I just didn't know if you might have a second [00:33:59] showing a movie at least. We won't know until we kind of get there because we [00:34:05] haven't done it before. But if we see a lot of interest this year, we'll [00:34:08] definitely consider that for next year. Do you have any other public comment? Thank [00:34:14] you. I'll move for approval of the request for $700. Second. Yeah, I mean, if [00:34:22] you take the $700 and divide it by 326, you've got just a few more than two [00:34:27] dollars apiece. So what a deal for the kids and what a deal for the city. And I [00:34:35] think that there certainly is a giving spirit from the Ritchie Suncoast [00:34:42] Theater because that's not going to make them money. And I'm glad to have them [00:34:47] participate and get the kids out. The second. Yeah, I mean, there's quite a [00:34:52] few reasons to take pride in this. One, I think it really shows a the strength of [00:34:58] the city's partnership with some of our downtown in terms of the library [00:35:04] partnering and the Ritchie Suncoast. Am I out of time? First it was the gavel. [00:35:12] Now you're putting the time on me? And the Ritchie Suncoast Theater. I know that [00:35:17] the Rec Center has some role to play in a couple of these events as well with [00:35:21] the Culture Affairs Committee. But I also wanted to speak more largely to the [00:35:26] Culture Affairs Committee and the diversity of present, you know, projects [00:35:30] they are presenting. I know City Council gave them a challenge during budget [00:35:35] season and increasing the budget trying to get it back to what it used to be [00:35:39] historically and saying if you know we're making this increase make sure [00:35:43] you're finding ways to spend it. And I think they have really did a I told you [00:35:48] so and it's only been a couple months in putting together a great list of [00:35:52] programs that are diverse that speak to some of the needs of our community and [00:35:57] providing an affordable experience for all. I will just also echo the [00:36:03] Mayor's question and turn it into a concern. I would hate to see you have to [00:36:07] turn people away and I know that's usually a point of a reason for someone [00:36:13] to get on social media and negatively paint the event because they were [00:36:16] turned away from the free experience. So just something to consider maybe having [00:36:20] a contingency plan because the Fire Department will have to do their part if [00:36:23] there is a capacity concern. So it looks like it's going to be a well-attended [00:36:28] event especially since it's free and I'm glad I'm glad it's happening. [00:36:34] I know I just I agree with you know what you guys have to say I think it's a [00:36:39] great event. Anytime we can you know provide a free experience to the [00:36:44] children and the adults and the community I think it's a great great [00:36:47] thing. You know unfortunately I'm not going to be able to attend so I'm a [00:36:51] little disappointed but hopefully next year. But I'm going to kind of be more [00:36:56] positive and say we're going to have just enough to fit and we'll make it [00:37:02] work and it'll be a success and we'll do it again next year. So thank you. [00:37:06] I really like these type of events. I think the more the more we have the [00:37:11] better. Draws more people downtown, helps all the businesses and it showcases our [00:37:17] Suncoast Theater. So I mean it's just a win-win all the way around. [00:37:21] A hundred percent. You can always give the passes to the parents to go out and [00:37:26] join downtown and come back and get their kids. All those in favor signify [00:37:31] by aye. Aye. Those opposed that's five nothing.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.e
Recommendation of Cultural Event: Strolling Carolers
approvedCouncil approved a Cultural Affairs Committee recommendation to fund a $700 professional Victorian-costumed Christmas caroling quartet to perform at the Light Up the Night event at Sims Park on Friday, December 5. The Mayor questioned whether local churches had been approached as alternatives.
- motion:Approve $700 funding for a professional Christmas caroling quartet to perform at the Light Up the Night event on December 5. (passed)
Sims ParkCultural Affairs CommitteeParks and Recreation DepartmentLarnell ScottMrs. FeigartCultural Affairs Committee November 6 meetingLight Up the Night holiday event▶ Jump to 37:37 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:37:37] Recommendation of cultural affairs strolling carolers. We have a second request this evening from the cultural affairs committee. This is [00:37:46] for an amount also in the for $700 for a musical performance from Christmas [00:37:57] carolers for our light of the night holiday event. And Mrs. Feigart will [00:38:05] present this agenda item as well to you more fully. Good evening again City [00:38:10] Council and Honorable Mayor. Tonight I bring forward a second recommendation [00:38:15] from the cultural affairs committee with regard to a proposal which would [00:38:19] enhance this year's light up the night event at Sims Park on Friday December [00:38:25] the 5th. At their November 6 cultural affairs committee meeting, Larnell Scott [00:38:31] proposed adding a professional Christmas caroling quartet to the light up the [00:38:38] night special community event orchestrated by the Parks and [00:38:42] Recreation Department. The committee unanimously voted to recommend this [00:38:46] proposal be afforded to City Council for your consideration and hopeful [00:38:51] approval. If approved, a quartet of Victorian costume-clad carolers will [00:38:57] perform traditional holiday songs following the tree lighting adding to a [00:39:02] genuine sense of community connection at one of the city's most most beloved [00:39:08] events. City Council is respectfully requested to consider the [00:39:13] cultural affairs committee recommendation to fully fund this [00:39:17] musical enhancement at the cost of $700. And I'm available or the cultural [00:39:23] affairs committee is available if you should have any questions. [00:39:29] Seeing no one come forward, bring it back for discussion. Move to approve. Second. To the maker. [00:39:35] My same comments from last time. Thank you. Yeah looking forward to having the [00:39:40] carolers out there. Go ahead. Could you remind me the date again? December the 5th. [00:39:50] I'm sorry, 5th. 5th, you're right. 5th. 5th, Friday. I just have one question. Did cultural affairs approach a [00:40:01] church to do this? Because I'd be interested in a local church [00:40:06] to possibly, you know, donate to them who is a local church. I think, Mayor, that [00:40:15] there were several committee members that had had researched this and tried [00:40:22] to find different community groups that might be available as well as these [00:40:28] professional singers. And the following business item, I think, also speaks to [00:40:34] that for your consideration. I'm sorry? No, they did. They did. And the next [00:40:44] business item for you to consider also, it's a community organization, a [00:40:54] non-profit. Well, no, so you didn't find any churches or you didn't talk to [00:40:59] churches, they didn't want to do it? I don't understand the answer. [00:41:04] Okay, that's what I'm asking. All right, we'll bring it back for discussion and vote. [00:41:15] I'll move approval. I'll second. Singing is good. Second. The more the merrier. [00:41:27] I'm good, looking forward to it. We have a motion on the floor. Okay, any comments? [00:41:36] Second. Do you have any comments? Any more comments? All those in favor, signify by [00:41:42] aye. Aye. Moving on to recommendation of cultural affairs, Thursday musical choral
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.f
Recommendation of Cultural Event: Thursday Musicale Choral Performance
approvedCouncil approved a $400 funding request from the Cultural Affairs Committee to support a holiday choral performance by Thursday Musicale, a local 25-member women's chorus, immediately preceding the Cotee River Christmas Boat Parade at Sims Park on December 6, 2025.
- vote:Approve $400 in funding for Thursday Musicale's holiday choral performance preceding the December 6, 2025 Cotee River Christmas Boat Parade. (passed)5–0
Indiana AvenueSims ParkCultural Affairs CommitteeMain Street OrganizationThursday MusicaleTimber PinesUnited Community Methodist ChurchBeth FragerMrs. FagerNancy CodyCotee River Christmas Boat ParadeCultural Initiatives and Event Form▶ Jump to 41:49 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:49] performance. The final recommendation this evening from the cultural affairs [00:41:54] committee for funding support in the amount of $400 for a holiday choral [00:42:02] performance. And Mrs. Fager, what's this one about? Thank you, Mrs. Mance. This is a [00:42:10] funding request to approve $400 for a holiday choral performance by Thursday [00:42:18] musical. That is a local nonprofit organization composed of approximately [00:42:25] 25 members that perform in various locations throughout the city and [00:42:31] elsewhere. If approved by City Council, this performance would take place [00:42:37] immediately preceding the boat parade that is scheduled for December the 6th, [00:42:44] 2025 at Sims Park. Cultural Affairs Committee member Beth Frager introduced [00:42:52] this proposal at the November 6th meeting. And if approved, this would [00:43:02] take place at the Cody River Christmas Boat Parade that's sponsored by the [00:43:07] Main Street Organization. The performance is intended to invite community [00:43:13] sing-alongs, foster shared holiday spirit, and enhance the atmosphere of the [00:43:18] evening's events. Cultural Affairs Committee members noted that the program [00:43:23] supports the city's cultural engagement goals by encouraging intergenerational [00:43:29] participation of singing and supporting local vocal performing artists, adding [00:43:35] warmth, authenticity, and depth to an already beloved community tradition. [00:43:41] Members of the Cultural Affairs Committee are present, and a cultural [00:43:49] initiatives and event form has been provided for Council review as well. [00:43:55] Any public comment? [00:44:05] My name is Nancy Cody. I've been part of Thursday Musical for the [00:44:11] last six years. We are a volunteer 25-member women's chorus. It's been [00:44:17] around in New Port Richey since 1928. We incorporated as a nonprofit in the 80s [00:44:27] and began giving scholarships to seniors in high school who are going to pursue [00:44:33] majors in music in college. Since then, we have donated over $70,000 [00:44:40] to these high school seniors, many of whom are still in our community [00:44:45] performing, either leading choirs or performing as professional musicians or [00:44:51] amateurs. That's one of the great things about living in New Port Richey is the [00:44:56] cultural opportunities that afford us. [00:45:00] So, I'd like to ask for a donation of $400. [00:45:06] We have 14 of our members that could be a part [00:45:10] of a caroling group on Saturday, the December the 6th, [00:45:16] and of our 25, it's a very busy time as you know. [00:45:20] So, I ask your questions if you have any, [00:45:24] I'll be happy to answer them. [00:45:26] Thank you. [00:45:28] Do you have any questions while she's here? [00:45:31] Just one, I'm guessing the $70,000 didn't come [00:45:33] from the $400 fee that you charged? [00:45:35] No. Well, it would go towards it, yes. [00:45:38] We pay our director and our company, as the rest [00:45:41] of us are amateur volunteers. [00:45:43] We rehearse at the United Community Methodist Church [00:45:47] on Indiana Avenue on Tuesdays from October through April. [00:45:51] We do six concerts. [00:45:53] We have one fundraiser, which is coming [00:45:55] up on February the 5th, by the way. [00:45:57] That's where we have tickets. [00:45:59] Everything else is donations. [00:46:01] We perform at the church, sometimes at Timber Pines, [00:46:06] et cetera. [00:46:09] Okay? Thank you. [00:46:11] Thank you for what you do. [00:46:13] Anybody else like to come up and speak? [00:46:17] Seeing no one else, bring it back for discussion and vote. [00:46:21] I'll second. [00:46:23] Yeah, we've heard some really great things. [00:46:25] It's getting us into the spirit of Christmas [00:46:28] and Thanksgiving hadn't even happened yet, so that's great. [00:46:31] Thank you. [00:46:32] No, I just think it's a great thing to donate back to these, [00:46:36] you know, kids that are interested in music, [00:46:39] which is a tough thing and expensive. [00:46:41] So any money that we can help contribute, [00:46:44] we gladly will do. [00:46:45] Thank you. [00:46:46] Looking forward to more singing. [00:46:48] Rital? [00:46:49] Yeah, just to say, I mean, [00:46:51] we could have just approved a choral performance tonight, [00:46:53] but in reality, we're, you know, [00:46:55] supporting a historic group [00:46:57] who has given back to the community. [00:46:58] So that's just another example of what our library [00:47:02] and our culture affairs group does in present [00:47:05] and making, excuse me, those that apply [00:47:07] through the culture affairs to make a presentation [00:47:12] that connects back to the vision [00:47:13] of giving back to this community. [00:47:15] So thank you for that. [00:47:17] Thank you for sharing your story. [00:47:19] I would revert back to what Andy said earlier. [00:47:22] She didn't want to let us know what was going on, [00:47:24] but it is a local group. [00:47:26] And so, and the money stays local and helps them. [00:47:29] And actually, it's really great that a lot of the people [00:47:32] that go off to college or go off to, you know, [00:47:35] music school come back and stay in this community. [00:47:38] So it's quite an honorable program you've got there. [00:47:41] Thank you. [00:47:41] You might hook up with those ladies [00:47:43] when they have the opening of the school in 1928, what, 22? [00:47:51] 22. [00:47:52] So all those in favor, signify by aye. [00:47:55] Aye. [00:47:56] That's five nothing. [00:47:58] Approval of the CDGB housing.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.g
Resolution No. 2026-03: Robert M. Rivera Fleet Maintenance Building
approvedCouncil unanimously approved Resolution 2026-03 naming the city's new fleet maintenance building the 'Robert M. Rivera Fleet Maintenance Building' in honor of Public Works Director Robert M. Rivera, who is retiring January 31, 2026 after 35 years of service. The naming was ratified retroactively to November 3, 2025.
Ord. Resolution No. 2026-03
- motion:Motion to approve Resolution 2026-03 naming the fleet maintenance building after Robert M. Rivera, ratified retroactively to November 3, 2025. (passed)5–0
MattNelson VogelRobert M. RiveraSherman ApplegateResolution No. 2026-03Robert M. Rivera Fleet Maintenance Building▶ Jump to 48:01 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:48:01] Resolution. [00:48:03] Resolution. [00:48:04] You skipped one. [00:48:05] Oh, resolution. [00:48:07] Oh, for that. [00:48:08] Resolution of 2026-03, Robert M. Rivera Fleet Maintenance [00:48:13] Building. [00:48:15] Mr. Mayor, it's my pleasure to read resolution number 2026-03, [00:48:19] a resolution of the city council of the city of New Port Richey, Florida, naming the city's fleet maintenance [00:48:24] building after public works director Robert M. Rivera, [00:48:29] ratifying the city manager's decision [00:48:31] to designate the building as provided herein, [00:48:34] authorizing the city manager to take [00:48:36] all actions consistent herewith, including placements of signs [00:48:40] as provided herein. [00:48:42] Mr. Mayor, members of council, as you're aware, [00:48:45] Mr. Robert Rivera will be retiring from the city [00:48:49] on January 31, 2026, after 35 years of service. [00:48:55] Mr. Rivera has provided exemplary leadership [00:48:59] during his tenure as a city employee. [00:49:05] After 37 years of public service, [00:49:07] I can tell you his style of leadership [00:49:10] has been unduplicated, in my opinion, in any place [00:49:16] that I have served. [00:49:19] And in that regard, Mr. Rivera has [00:49:24] left an indelible mark on this city [00:49:28] through innumerable projects and initiatives. [00:49:33] And more profoundly, though, he has left a mark on all of us [00:49:37] who have had the honor to serve along with him [00:49:42] during his tenure through his commitment [00:49:45] to public good, his trustworthiness, his fairness, [00:49:51] his caring nature, his respect for others. [00:49:56] And for this, I'm asking you to approve [00:50:01] that the new public service facility shall [00:50:03] bear the name of the Robert M. Rivera Fleet Maintenance [00:50:07] Building, and that it hereby be ratified retroactively [00:50:13] to November 3rd of 2025. [00:50:18] Any public comment? [00:50:20] See, Robert, you can't get up, nor can you vote. [00:50:25] We'll bring it back for discussion vote. [00:50:27] Approve that, Mr. Mayor. [00:50:28] I'll second. [00:50:29] To the maker. [00:50:30] Yeah, I just had the good pleasure [00:50:32] of knowing Robert from the first day [00:50:34] he came to work here in New Port Richey. [00:50:36] And certainly, he has worked up through the ranks [00:50:39] and shown great resolve. [00:50:43] And hanging in there, the facility [00:50:46] that we're naming him after is one [00:50:49] that he's waited patiently through many budgets that [00:50:51] did not get funded. [00:50:53] So I think it's an appropriate building to name him after. [00:50:59] And I'm happy to make that motion, Robert. [00:51:02] Right over the second. [00:51:04] Go ahead. [00:51:07] Mr. Rivera, he's just such a knowledgeable person, [00:51:10] and it's a great, great honor to name the building after him. [00:51:13] Very fitting. [00:51:15] He's just one of those guys you call him, [00:51:17] and he's just like the go-to for everything. [00:51:19] It won't even have something to do with public works. [00:51:21] I'll call him about something that's just off and left field, [00:51:26] and he'll at least know where to go to find the answer. [00:51:29] Call him. [00:51:30] May not answer right then, but calls you right back, texts. [00:51:33] So he's just been a pleasure to work with, [00:51:35] and we're really going to lose a valuable member when [00:51:41] he does retire. [00:51:42] And I'll definitely miss him. [00:51:44] And I don't know if anybody else bugs him [00:51:46] as much as I do about the lights on the bridge, [00:51:48] but I'm always bothering about that. [00:51:50] No. [00:51:56] Well, unfortunately, I've had the shortest tenure with you, [00:52:00] but I think it's been great. [00:52:03] I think it's a phenomenal honor, and it's well-deserved. [00:52:07] And I can utter everybody's sentiments up here [00:52:10] that just in my short time with you, [00:52:13] you've been phenomenal, very knowledgeable, [00:52:16] and like Matt said, going to be big shoes to fill. [00:52:20] So thank you. [00:52:23] So when I was in middle school, I [00:52:25] had the pleasure of meeting Robert [00:52:28] and shadowing the various departments. [00:52:31] And he was one of them that is able to explain [00:52:36] a complex topic, the infrastructure in our city, [00:52:40] to someone that's 12 years old or to one of his peers. [00:52:45] And I think that is a talent far and few. [00:52:49] And so given public works and the complexity [00:52:52] of the work you do, both above ground and underground, [00:52:55] it is a talent that we so need in this city [00:52:57] to be able to communicate those complex things to the public. [00:53:00] And you have done so for years. [00:53:03] In fact, one of my best friends who attended that same event, [00:53:06] he was the one who shadowed you and took [00:53:09] an interest in engineering because of the conversations [00:53:11] he had with you. [00:53:12] So you have had a tremendous impact on this community. [00:53:16] Thank you. [00:53:17] I have to ask, who had your job before you? [00:53:19] What was his name? [00:53:21] Nelson Vogel. [00:53:22] No. [00:53:22] No, there's another guy. [00:53:23] Oh, yeah. [00:53:25] Sherman? [00:53:26] Sherman Applegate. [00:53:27] Applegate. [00:53:28] Sherman Applegate and I, he was the director [00:53:30] of when I came aboard. [00:53:32] And he and I went out and painted the bridge on Madison. [00:53:36] And right after that, Sherman stepped down [00:53:40] and you took his spot. [00:53:42] And you put a tie on and said, I'm never taking this tie off [00:53:44] because you'll put me to work. [00:53:46] And he still hasn't taken the tie off [00:53:49] because he's not going to go paint the bridge with me. [00:53:54] Relationship, and it's just been a great time. [00:53:56] So we've had a lot of fun together. [00:53:59] And always, like you guys have said, he always has the answer, [00:54:01] or at least points you in the direction. [00:54:03] So all those in favor, signify by aye. [00:54:06] Aye. [00:54:06] That's 5-0. [00:54:08] OK, approval of the CDBG Housing Redevelopment Citizens
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9.h
Approval of CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Citizens Advisory Task Force Recommendations
approvedCouncil certified the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Citizens Advisory Task Force ranked list of eight applicants eligible for grant-funded home rehabilitation (up to $80,000 each), and discussed but had not yet finally voted on a waiver of the homeowner's insurance requirement for three applicants who cited financial hardship. All councilmembers declared no conflicts of interest. The list was certified; the insurance waiver motion was under debate with concerns about enforceability and risk to the city.
- consensus:Each councilmember individually declared no conflict of interest with any of the listed CDBG applicants. (passed)
- motion:Certify the ranked list of CDBG housing rehabilitation program applicants as eligible. (passed)
- motion:Approve waiver of homeowner's insurance requirement for Judith Allen, Ellen Krakiola, and Damian Wolfe with the provision that they obtain insurance after improvements are completed. (none)
5608 Wyoming Avenue5925 Montana Avenue5934 Pine Street5940 Grand Boulevard6015 Wyoming Avenue6349 Illinois Avenue6442 Adams Street6640 Dartmoor LaneGuardianBrittany HarmackCameron StubblefieldCatherine ClarkCouncilman ButlerDamian WolfeEllen KrakiolaGail SmithGary McClellanJudith AllenKent LipsingKyle HarmackCDBG Housing Rehabilitation ProgramCitizens Advisory Task ForceCommunity Development Block Grant (CDBG)FEMA housing assistance comparisonHUD rulesState Department of Economic Opportunity▶ Jump to 54:12 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:54:12] Advisory Task Force recommendations. [00:54:14] All right, the request before you this evening [00:54:17] is to consider the recommendation of the Citizens [00:54:21] Advisory Task Force related to the use of community [00:54:25] development block grant funds to support housing [00:54:28] rehabilitation activities. [00:54:31] The Citizens Advisory Task Force met on September 31st. [00:54:35] And they met to consider the ranking of applicants [00:54:40] as it relates to the administration of the program. [00:54:44] There are three things that I will be [00:54:46] asking you to do this evening. [00:54:49] The first thing is I will be asking [00:54:52] you to indicate that you have no conflict of interest [00:54:58] as it relates to the candidates that [00:55:02] appear on the ranking list, which means that you are not [00:55:07] related to any of them that are eligible for program [00:55:11] participation. [00:55:13] And I'll be indicating that they are not employees of the city. [00:55:17] The second thing is that you'll be certifying [00:55:20] the list that will be presented to you [00:55:25] as part of this agenda item. [00:55:28] And that means that they are eligible to be program [00:55:34] participants as far as you know. [00:55:39] The third thing that we will be asking of you related [00:55:43] to this agenda item is related to the fact [00:55:49] that three of the applicants for the program [00:55:54] do not currently maintain homeowner's insurance. [00:55:59] They do not maintain homeowner's insurance [00:56:01] because they have indicated that it [00:56:04] is a financial hardship in order for them to do so. [00:56:10] And therefore, they have asked for a waiver [00:56:16] from the program requirement that you [00:56:19] do have homeowner's insurance. [00:56:22] The caveat to that is they have indicated [00:56:28] that if they receive grant assistance through this program [00:56:35] that at the conclusion of having received improvements [00:56:40] through the program, they will purchase homeowner's insurance. [00:56:46] Now, I bring this matter to your attention [00:56:50] only because there is an inherent risk [00:56:53] that those receiving this grant assistance [00:56:56] may not financially be able to comply [00:57:01] with their commitment to you to obtain insurance [00:57:05] at the conclusion of having received this grant assistance. [00:57:08] So there is an opportunity that they [00:57:13] won't fulfill their plan to purchase insurance. [00:57:16] And that potentially, should the unthinkable occur, [00:57:23] the city could lose money if they [00:57:27] were to have some form of household difficulty [00:57:33] and there was a fire or other disaster which would [00:57:40] put the improvements at risk. [00:57:42] And so you need to consider that as part [00:57:46] of your approval of the program applicants who [00:57:50] are unable to provide insurance. [00:57:54] The program, again, is a grant program. [00:57:59] And it is a federal grant program. [00:58:02] It is administered through the State Department [00:58:07] of Economic Opportunity. [00:58:11] Program participants are eligible for up [00:58:16] to $80,000 worth of program improvements. [00:58:23] The candidate ranking is based on variables such as their age, [00:58:29] the number of inhabitants in their household, [00:58:33] and their income and preference is [00:58:35] given to those with the lowest household income. [00:58:40] The ranking is established, in our case, [00:58:43] by independent consultants who administer the program [00:58:47] on the city's behalf. [00:58:51] The applicant listing and order of approved ranking [00:58:56] is first, Ellen Krakiola of 5934 Pine Street. [00:59:03] Second, Judith Allen of 5940 Grand Boulevard. [00:59:10] Cameron Stubblefield of 6349 Illinois Avenue. [00:59:17] Gail Smith, 6015 Wyoming Avenue. [00:59:23] Catherine Clark of 5925 Montana Avenue. [00:59:29] Catherine Clark, I'm sorry, Gary McClellan, 6640 Dartmoor Lane. [00:59:35] Kyle and Brittany Harmack, 5608 Wyoming Avenue. [00:59:42] And Damian Wolfe of 6442 Adams Street. [00:59:46] And I need each of you individually [00:59:49] to indicate whether or not you have a conflict of interest [00:59:52] related to any of those indicated [00:59:57] as appearing on the app. [01:00:00] Kent Lipsing? [01:00:02] Yeah. [01:00:03] On my end, I have no conflict of interest with any of the names. [01:00:08] Does the conflict of interest clause differ here from, say, like [01:00:12] a quasi-judicial? Is it the same criteria? Are you related to any of them? [01:00:16] Just related? [01:00:21] Nope, neither am I. [01:00:25] Then the next [01:00:26] item [01:00:27] is, do you approve of the candidate listing [01:00:31] to go forward [01:00:33] with participation in the program? [01:00:36] Do we need public comment? [01:00:38] Yeah, do we have public comment? [01:00:41] Seeing no one come forward. [01:00:42] Bring it back. [01:00:45] This was put together by the CDGB group, not us. [01:00:49] It was put together by Guardian, who is our consultant on the program, yes. [01:00:55] I'll second. [01:00:57] Just to say this was a long time coming. If you pull up these applications and the [01:01:02] documents that were acquired, [01:01:03] I mean, they're like 23 pages long. It's a lot to put together. There's a lot that [01:01:06] needs to be notarized. [01:01:08] It's going towards [01:01:10] the rehabilitation of our neighborhoods, especially to those who fit a criteria [01:01:14] that need it the most. [01:01:15] I know that we had [01:01:18] one person speak tonight that's on the application. I'm going to save my comments [01:01:22] related to that [01:01:23] for communications. [01:01:26] On the theme there that was presented, [01:01:29] just to [01:01:31] give my appreciation to the [01:01:34] city manager [01:01:36] and to the Guardian consultant group and everyone on staff who has [01:01:40] worked diligently on this [01:01:42] for the reason that I know this was a primary concern, [01:01:45] making sure that we're investing into our neighborhoods and [01:01:49] into our residents. [01:01:51] The city manager made a commitment [01:01:53] some time ago to [01:01:56] resist some of the state audits and whatever was slowing down this [01:02:00] programming [01:02:01] and to make it happen. Tonight shows that we are [01:02:04] steps closer to making that happen. [01:02:08] No, I just have to agree with [01:02:10] what Councilman Butler had to say. [01:02:14] We're here to help. [01:02:15] Obviously, we need to make sure that [01:02:18] everybody's doing what they need to do. [01:02:20] Unfortunately, these processes take much longer than we would like, [01:02:24] but it's part of the process. [01:02:26] I'm just happy to get the ball rolling and moving forward. [01:02:29] I'm just glad we are moving this forward and [01:02:32] getting through the system. [01:02:35] There's no number values assigned [01:02:37] yet to these applicants. [01:02:39] There's no number values yet assigned to the [01:02:41] applicants. [01:02:44] There are number values and they are [01:02:45] as indicated to you in the list that I read. [01:02:50] It's based on the variables [01:02:53] as to their income [01:02:56] and household size. [01:03:01] I guess I'm talking about the amount of the grant. [01:03:04] The amount of the grant. [01:03:06] I do know some of them. [01:03:09] Yes, but I'm not aware of all of them. [01:03:12] But if you look at the backup materials, [01:03:15] it will [01:03:17] indicate [01:03:19] in the application package [01:03:23] the scope of work to be addressed in each of the properties. [01:03:29] All right, I'll look through it then. [01:03:32] I just didn't see it. [01:03:32] Yes. [01:03:37] That was part of my question, too. [01:03:38] Is everybody going to get funded or [01:03:41] you talk about ranking. Are we expecting that half of this list gets [01:03:45] ranked from the board? [01:03:47] All of those that are listed before you this evening [01:03:51] will be serviced through the program. We have enough funding available to tend to [01:03:55] all of the needs that have been identified. [01:03:58] That I think is the question. So whether you were the first ranked or the last [01:04:00] ranked, you're in if we approve this and then the follow-up is [01:04:04] I didn't hear in the motion, but I'm expecting that the intention was that we [01:04:08] would accept the waiver of insurance with the provision that's been made. [01:04:13] Is that correct? [01:04:15] We should make a separation. [01:04:17] Yes. [01:04:18] This is just to certify the list at this time. [01:04:21] All those in favor of certifying the list? [01:04:25] Aye. [01:04:26] Any applicants that are unable at this time [01:04:30] to provide homeowners insurance are Judith Allen, [01:04:35] Ellen Krakiola, and Damian Wolfe, [01:04:38] and are asking for an exemption [01:04:42] from that requirement. [01:04:44] Do we have any public comment on this section? [01:04:47] I'll move forward on the allowance of the [01:04:51] waivers with the provisions outlined that they maintain insurance. [01:04:56] Do we have a second? [01:05:00] You can't amend a motion, you need to second it. [01:05:04] You can deny that one and we'll bank another one. [01:05:09] And yours is that after they get the improvements done, they have to have [01:05:13] insurance? That's correct. [01:05:14] I'll just second the point of conversation. [01:05:18] Okay, so the point that I would like to make is [01:05:22] if someone has a mortgage, they have to have insurance. So if they don't have a [01:05:25] mortgage, then one would induce, and I don't know how many [01:05:30] liens or anything else would be on it, but those liens would probably be the [01:05:33] city's liens if they were anybody's. So if the amount of the money is $80,000, [01:05:38] I don't think that your comment that the city would lose [01:05:41] money would really be effective. If a house burns down, a new house gets built, [01:05:46] lots in town are pretty much already at that amount. So [01:05:49] I'm not suggesting that that would be a favorable outcome, [01:05:53] but I don't really think that there's a whole lot of risk for us. [01:05:56] If a house is highly mortgaged and we put money in it and it burns down and [01:06:00] it's not insured, the city loses value. But if someone doesn't have insurance, [01:06:06] it's probably an indication they don't have a [01:06:08] mortgage that would require it. And so I think that we're pretty safe in [01:06:12] terms of the value of the property not being lost to the city. [01:06:18] Anyway, once they got the work done, we can sit there and say they have to [01:06:22] get insurance. Yeah, and they may provide it. Yeah, but I'm just saying they [01:06:25] may not get it anyhow. Well, that's what I'm saying is I think it's a risk worth [01:06:30] taking. [01:06:33] Well, I'm on the opposite end of that where [01:06:36] you look at some of these FEMA assistants, [01:06:40] they provide insurance for three years after you've received housing [01:06:44] funding, housing repair funding, and then if you fall off [01:06:48] on your insurance, they just won't let you reapply. [01:06:51] And that kind of, to me, solves the problem of [01:06:55] yeah, if a house goes down, you can still earn taxable income on that in terms of a [01:06:59] rebuild and over time net whatever [01:07:03] went into the improvement. My question is, [01:07:07] would it be more, because I don't want [01:07:10] this application to turn into a hardship where some of these people are making [01:07:14] the commitment, these three people are making the [01:07:16] commitment to get insurance at the time of the work's [01:07:20] completion. And with the insurance market, [01:07:24] that's kind of handicapping them. They're making a commitment they may not [01:07:26] be able to keep. My mind goes to, and I don't know if this is within the [01:07:31] scope of the CDBG outline, is to [01:07:35] recommend they get insurance and if they don't, [01:07:39] make them ineligible for further CDBG in the future [01:07:45] to prevent repetitive loss. And the only reason I say that is because, I mean, what [01:07:51] is, let's say, and the mayor brought it up, what is [01:07:53] preventing someone from saying we will get insurance and not [01:07:56] getting it? Does that mean then they get a $78,000 [01:07:59] on their property for not complying with the requirements? [01:08:03] There is [01:08:09] no power available to us in [01:08:16] respect to the housing rehab program to compel [01:08:19] them to obtain insurance. In fact, under the HUD rules, [01:08:27] they would consider it an impediment [01:08:33] against a low-income person to force them [01:08:40] to purchase insurance over some of maybe their other needs if [01:08:47] they were very low income. So how can they, so you said at the, and [01:08:52] maybe I misunderstood, at the end of this they are being told [01:08:55] they need to get insurance. That's true. But they're not necessarily and [01:09:00] we cannot enforce that. Okay, understood. Okay. [01:09:04] Well, we just, I mean, with that said, I mean, I really don't think it matters if [01:09:07] they have it or not. If it's on them, you know, we'd say, hey, [01:09:10] we, you know, you should probably get [01:09:11] insurance. But if they don't, if something happens, it's on them. They can't [01:09:15] apply again and move on. I just think it's a lot of [01:09:19] a lot of paperwork and a lot of, you know, trying to ensure they have it [01:09:22] and time spent on something that is really not going to change anything. [01:09:29] Yeah, so what I would hope is that, you know, if [01:09:32] we're approving all these people to get funding, obviously they're low income, [01:09:36] they need the help. But I would think, without [01:09:41] understanding their situation, that if we're stepping out and, [01:09:45] you know, giving them $60,000 or whatever we're giving them, [01:09:49] I would seem to think that insurance on some of these smaller dwellings [01:09:54] that's just more catastrophic should be fairly reasonable. [01:09:58] Now, I can't say that because I'm not an insurance agent, but [01:10:01] I just feel if they at least make the attempt, [01:10:05] I think that would satisfy everybody here. You know, [01:10:08] the fact that if they go out, they get a quote, and if they can basically say, hey, [01:10:12] look, this is going to prove a hardship to me, [01:10:15] we really can't force it. But I think us asking for it just [01:10:19] makes us hold ourselves accountable for providing them funding. [01:10:24] You know, I think that's the best way to do it. [01:10:27] I mean, we can't make them, but we can ask. [01:10:31] Well, does the CDBG initially, right now, require that they have it [01:10:36] before they can apply for this? It is a program requirement that there [01:10:41] is homeowner's insurance, but they do provide [01:10:46] the opportunity for the waiver. [01:10:51] We voted on that. And you vote on the waiver. [01:10:57] Anybody else comment? Yeah, just to follow up to say [01:11:02] that, you know, let's just motion go. If it fails, you can make another motion, but [01:11:06] I really think that asking someone to be responsible when [01:11:09] they're given money they don't have to pay back [01:11:12] to protect their property and to protect the city's interest in that [01:11:16] is reasonable. If they don't, to your point, I don't think there's any [01:11:20] callback. They don't have to pay the money back.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 10Communications▶ 1:11:23
- 11Adjournment▶ 1:33:50
- 1Call to Order – Roll Call
- 2
Pledge of Allegiance
Pledge of Allegiance.
- 3
Moment of Silence
Moment of silence.
- 4.a
- 5.a
October 30, 2025 Work Session and November 4, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes
Approval of minutes from the October 30, 2025 Work Session and the November 4, 2025 Regular Meeting.