Newly sworn councilmembers Peter Altman and Brian Jonas joined as Matt Murphy was named Deputy Mayor 5-0; a non-ad valorem revenue notes ordinance was held for a future meeting.
28 items on the agenda · 15 decisions recorded
On the agenda
- 1Call to Order – Roll Call▶ 0:00
- 2
Pledge of Allegiance
Pledge of Allegiance recited.
▶ Jump to 0:00 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:00] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for [00:00:29] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [00:00:36] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for [00:01:00] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [00:01:24] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for [00:01:51] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [00:02:18] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for [00:02:33] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [00:02:58] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for [00:03:13] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [00:03:40] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for [00:03:55] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [00:04:15] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for [00:04:40] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 4
Approval of April 1, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes
approvedApproval of the April 1, 2025 regular meeting minutes.
▶ Jump to 5:05 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:05:05] I further swear or affirm that I will in all respects observe the provisions of the charter and ordinances of the city of New Port Richey
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 6
Oath of Office for Newly Elected City Council Members - Peter Altman and Brian Jonas
Newly elected council members Peter Altman and Brian Jonas were sworn into office, taking the oath as council members for the City of New Port Richey.
▶ Jump to 5:15 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:05:21] and will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of council member of said city to the best of my ability. [00:05:34] Thank you. [00:05:55] I, Brian Jonas, a citizen of the state of Florida and of the United States of America, and a full-time resident of the city of New Port Richey, [00:06:10] and being an officer of the city of New Port Richey, and a recipient of public funds as such officer, do hereby solemnly swear or affirm [00:06:27] that I will support the Constitution and laws of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the state of Florida. [00:06:41] I further swear or affirm that I will in all respects observe the provisions of the charter and ordinances of the city of New Port Richey [00:06:57] and will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of council member of said city to the best of my ability. [00:07:10] Thank you. [00:07:21] Mr. Mayor, can we get a picture of Pete and Dixie and Brian and his family? [00:07:34] Jonas's. [00:08:04] Judy, maybe we could get you to join them in the picture. [00:08:34] Judy, maybe you could shake Pete's hand before Dixie leaves. [00:08:51] Yeah. [00:09:19] Appointment for the Deputy Mayor. Do I have any nominations?
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 7
Appointment of Deputy Mayor
approvedCouncil appointed the Deputy Mayor. An initial motion to nominate Bertell Butler died for lack of a second. A subsequent motion to appoint Matt Murphy as Deputy Mayor was seconded and passed 5-0.
- motion:Motion to appoint Bertell Butler as Deputy Mayor. (failed)
- motion:Motion to appoint Matt Murphy as Deputy Mayor. (passed)5–0
▶ Jump to 9:29 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:09:30] Appointment for the Deputy Mayor. Do I have any nominations? [00:09:36] Well, I've made the last nominations, all three of them, so the next one in line would be Bertell Butler, so I'll move for Bertell to be the Deputy Mayor. [00:09:47] Do we have a second? [00:09:53] What do we do now, just bring it back next to the meeting? [00:09:56] Trying to get another motion, you need a Deputy Mayor. [00:09:58] Need another motion then? [00:10:01] I'll move for Matt Murphy to be Deputy Mayor. [00:10:04] Do we have a second? [00:10:08] I'll second. [00:10:10] All those in favor, signify by aye. [00:10:12] Aye. [00:10:13] Those opposed? [00:10:16] Aye. [00:10:17] Okay, so we have five, four, I don't know, can you count, can he vote? [00:10:22] Yes, he can vote for this. [00:10:24] Okay. [00:10:26] So that was five in favor? [00:10:27] Yes. [00:10:28] For the record, okay.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9
Proclamation - Day Of Remembrance
approvedMayor Chopper Davis read a proclamation designating April 24, 2025 as Day of Remembrance in the City of New Port Richey, in memory of victims of the Holocaust and in honor of survivors, rescuers, and liberators. Mr. Becker accepted the proclamation and thanked the city for its annual support.
▶ Jump to 10:30 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:10:30] Second. [00:10:31] Okay, a proclamation for the Monarch. [00:10:36] I would like Sasha to be in attendance related to this matter, and I'm not certain that she's in the room yet, so we may need to defer that matter and take the [00:10:46] Day of Remembrance then? [00:10:48] Is Mr. Becker here? [00:10:49] Yeah, I saw him. [00:10:50] Okay, Mr. Becker in the back. [00:11:01] Oh. [00:11:22] Ready? [00:11:23] This is a proclamation of the Office of the Mayor of the City of New Port Richey, whereas the Holocaust was the state-sponsored systemic persecution and annihilation of [00:11:31] 6 million European Jews alongside more than 5 million other innocent victims by Nazi Germany and its collaborators between 1933 and 1945. [00:11:42] And whereas it is important that every resident honor those resilient enough to survive the terrible atrocities of the Holocaust that defy our imagination and to never forget [00:11:52] the precious lives that were so senselessly lost, and whereas the history of the Holocaust offers an opportunity to reflect on the moral responsibilities of [00:12:01] individuals, societies, and governments as evidenced by our efforts here in New Port Richey and Pasco County to bring people together of all faiths, beliefs, [00:12:10] backgrounds, and nationalities with love and respect to celebrate all that we have in common. [00:12:17] And whereas pursuant to an act of Congress in 1980, the United States Holocaust Memorial Council designates the Day of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust to be [00:12:26] Yom HaShoah, being Thursday, April 24, 2025, and whereas the Day of Remembrance has been set aside to remember the victims of the Holocaust and the innocent victims of all war, [00:12:39] violence, and strife here and abroad as we reflect on the need of respect for all peoples, and now, therefore, I, Chopper Davis, Mayor of the City of New Port Richey, [00:12:48] do hereby proclaim April 24, 2025, as Day of Remembrance in the City of New Port Richey in memory of the victims of the Holocaust and in honor of the survivors, [00:12:59] as well as the rescuers and liberators, and urge all residents to work to promote human dignity and confront hate whenever and wherever it occurs. [00:13:11] Thank you so much. Usually I'm here to try to solicit support for the library and all that, and we appreciate all that you do for really every aspect of our city, but especially this. [00:13:32] I think I'm so proud to be a citizen of this town, which we've had nothing but support, nothing but understanding, and we have to continue this. [00:13:44] We have to remember that it's a beautiful, beautiful day today. The sun is out. The sky is so blue, and yet, throughout the world, we have destruction, and we have hatred and bigotry, [00:13:57] and let's continue to be a beacon of light. Let's set that example that people can live together in a community and live peacefully and respect one another, a loved one's neighbor. [00:14:09] Thank you again so much for doing this every year. It means so much to our community, and I hope to the rest of the city as well. Thank you very much. [00:14:18] Thank you.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 10
Proclamation - Gulf High School 2025 Graduates
approvedMayor Chopper Davis read a proclamation recognizing Gulf High School's 2025 graduating class — the 101st class from the school, with 362 members — congratulating them on their achievements. A representative from Gulf High School accepted the proclamation and thanked the council.
▶ Jump to 14:32 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:14:32] Jeff? [00:14:38] This is a proclamation of the Office of the Mayor of the City of New Port Richey. Whereas, Gulf High School was founded in 1922 and held its first graduation ceremonies for seniors, [00:15:00] years on April 29, 1924, with a graduating class of 11 students, and whereas the year [00:15:07] 2025 marks the 101st graduating class from Gulf High School, and whereas graduation ceremonies [00:15:12] have been a rite of passage that dates back to the 12th century and culminates the 13-year [00:15:18] journey each student makes between kindergarten and high school, and whereas the City Council [00:15:22] for the City of New Port Richey deems it proper to recognize the 362 members of the class [00:15:27] of 2025 at Gulf High School for all their hard work and dedication which has gotten [00:15:32] them to this historic moment, now therefore I, Chopper Davis, Mayor of the City of New [00:15:37] New Port Richey, do hereby congratulate the Gulf High School class of 2025 and wish them all [00:15:42] well on their future endeavors. [00:15:55] It is wonderful to be here at the City Council Chamber. [00:15:59] Council members, Mayor, Deputy Mayor, we are so pleased to see all of this sea of green [00:16:06] honoring Gulf High School and what it means to the City of New Port Richey. [00:16:10] The citizens of New Port Richey mean a great deal to us at Gulf High. [00:16:13] Thank you. [00:16:14] Thank you. [00:16:15] Do we have Sasha in attendance?
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 11
Proclamation - Volunteer Recognition Day (By Title Only)
approvedThe Council read by title only a proclamation recognizing National Volunteer Week, April 20–26, as Volunteer Recognition Day.
▶ Jump to 16:25 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:16:28] No, but we have a volunteer proclamation by title only, Mr. Mayor. [00:16:32] Yes, we have a proclamation that's a volunteer recognition day, which is April 20th to April [00:16:40] 26th is Volunteer Week, National Volunteer Week, so we have a proclamation by name only. [00:16:45] All those in attendance must be respectful of others' opinions and refrain from making
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 12Vox Pop for Items Not Listed on the Agenda or Listed on Consent Agenda▶ 16:59
- 13.a
Cultural Affairs Committee Minutes - February 2025
on consentItem listed as Cultural Affairs Committee Minutes for February 2025, but the transcript excerpt instead references repeal of Section 6-31 of Article 2 of Chapter 6 of the Code of Ordinances regarding tool sheds and utility buildings. Insufficient transcript content to determine outcome.
Cultural Affairs Committee Minutes - February 2025Section 6-31, Article 2, Chapter 6 of the Code of Ordinances▶ Jump to 40:30 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:40:30] The repeals section 6-31 of Article 2 of Chapter 6 of the Code of Ordinances, having to do with tool sheds and utility buildings.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 13.c
Purchases/Payments for City Council Approval
withdrawnon consentItem was removed from the agenda before discussion.
- direction:Item removed from the agenda. (withdrawn)
▶ Jump to 40:40 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:40:40] Excuse me, excuse me, that's been taken off the agenda. That one before has been taken off the agenda.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 13.d
Budget Amendment
on consentBrief procedural request to the Mayor to reorder the agenda by moving business item E forward.
▶ Jump to 40:45 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:40:49] Mr. Mayor, I'm going to make a plea to the Mayor who sets the agenda. If you wouldn't mind moving item E of the business items up.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 14.a
Second Reading, Ordinance No. 2025-2325: Authorize Issuance of Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Notes
tabledThe Mayor noted that Ordinance No. 2025-2325, authorizing issuance of non-ad valorem revenue notes, was skipped on the agenda and staff plans to bring it back at a future meeting. No action was taken on the item at this meeting.
Ord. Ordinance No. 2025-2325
- direction:Staff will bring Ordinance No. 2025-2325 back at a future meeting after it was skipped on the agenda. (tabled)
▶ Jump to 40:50 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:01] We're going to do that right after this. We have to do the public reading of ordinances before we can do that. [00:41:07] In that case, I apologize. I had a death in the family last night, and I've overstayed by 10 minutes. [00:41:13] So I informed staff that I would stay for all the stuff that we need to get to. I don't want to be rude, but I do have to go. [00:41:19] So if we can't make that adjustment, thank you. I appreciate that. I did communicate with staff my information. [00:41:26] Okay, perfect. Thank you. I appreciate it. Thank you. [00:41:34] Mr. Mayor, there's another ordinance that you skipped over. We plan on bringing that back. [00:41:41] Yes. So I just want to make that announcement publicly. That's ordinance number 2025-2325.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 14.b
First Reading, Ordinance No. 2025-2322: Repeal Section 6-31 of Article II of Chapter 6 of the Code of Ordinances RE: Toolsheds and Utility Buildings
approvedFirst reading of Ordinance 2025-2322, a housekeeping measure to repeal Section 6-31 of the city code regarding toolsheds and utility buildings, which has been obsolete since 1991 when the Land Development Code was updated with Section 12.03 covering detached garages, storage buildings, and greenhouses. The ordinance was approved on first reading 4-0 with one absent, and will be heard again on May 6th.
Ord. Ordinance No. 2025-2322
- motion:Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance 2025-2322 repealing Section 6-31 regarding toolsheds and utility buildings. (passed)4–0
Mr. HallMs. MannsArticle II of Chapter 6Land Development Code Section 12.03Ordinance 2025-2322Section 6-31▶ Jump to 41:49 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:49] And that ordinance will be heard on May 6th at 6 p.m. [00:41:55] This is ordinance number 2025-2322, an ordinance of the city of New Port Richey, Florida, [00:42:00] providing for repeal of section 6-31 of article 2 of chapter 6 of the code of ordinances pertaining to tool sheds and utility buildings, [00:42:07] providing for conflicts, severability, and an effective date. [00:42:11] And Mr. Hall is prepared to present the agenda item. [00:42:15] Thank you, Ms. Manns. This is basically a housekeeping item. [00:42:19] In 1991, the LDC, the Land Development Code, was updated to add section 12.03, [00:42:28] which is detached garages, storage buildings, and greenhouses. [00:42:34] When that was adopted, it basically superseded the section that we're talking about tonight, [00:42:40] which is section 6.31, tool sheds and utility buildings. [00:42:44] It has been incorporated in this ordinance that was adopted in 1991. [00:42:49] So basically, it's obsolete. [00:42:53] And going through code and updating and revising some things, [00:42:56] this is information that is no longer needed in the code [00:43:00] because it's duplicated or superseded in the other section. [00:43:03] So we're asking for the city council to allow amendment to the city code [00:43:10] just to remove that old provisions in tool sheds and utility buildings that is basically obsolete. [00:43:15] Do we have any public comment? [00:43:18] I see no one come forward. We'll bring it back for discussion and vote. [00:43:24] Move for approval. [00:43:25] I'll second. [00:43:26] Maker? [00:43:27] Nothing. Just cleaning up the books. [00:43:29] Yep, second. [00:43:30] Saint? [00:43:31] Yep. [00:43:32] All those in favor, signify by aye. [00:43:34] Aye. [00:43:35] So that's a four zip, one absentee. [00:43:38] Okay, moving on to business items.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.a
Resolution No. 2025-14: Authorize Issuance of Tax-Exempt Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Note 2025A and Taxable Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Note 2025B and Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement
tabledConsideration of Resolution No. 2025-14 authorizing issuance of tax-exempt and taxable non-ad valorem revenue notes was postponed to the May 6th meeting at 6 p.m. due to an error in the legal notice that did not provide sufficient days, requiring re-advertising.
Ord. Resolution No. 2025-14
- direction:Resolution No. 2025-14 postponed to the May 6th meeting at 6 p.m. due to insufficient days in the legal notice; matter will be re-advertised. (tabled)
Amended and Restated Interlocal AgreementResolution No. 2025-14Tax-Exempt Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Note 2025ATaxable Non-Ad Valorem Revenue Note 2025B▶ Jump to 43:40 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:43:41] Just as a note, section A, that's been also put off until May 6th. [00:43:48] That will be on the resolution number 2025-14 will be moved to May 6th meeting at 6 p.m. [00:43:55] And I'd like to note that the reason that we are moving those two agenda items [00:44:00] is the result of an error that was made in the legal notice. [00:44:06] We did not provide enough days in our notice and we'll be re-advertising. [00:44:13] And as indicated by the city attorney, we will then consider the matter on May 6th. [00:44:21] Then we'll go to item 15B, which is the Kentucky Derby pub crawl alcohol special permit application and event wet zone request.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.b
Kentucky Derby Pub Crawl Alcohol Special Event Permit Application and Event Wet Zone Request
approvedCouncil approved the Rotary Club of West Pasco Sunset's application for the 2025 Kentucky Derby Pub Crawl special event permit and established a wet zone in the alleyway behind Infusion Brewing Company on Saturday, May 3rd from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. The event is a fundraiser featuring a walking pub crawl to downtown businesses with seating, entertainment, and derby-themed games.
- motion:Approve the 2025 Kentucky Derby Pub Crawl alcoholic beverage special event application and establish a wet zone in the alleyway behind Infusion Brewing Company from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Saturday, May 3rd. (passed)
Gloria Swanson parking lotalleyway behind Infusion Brewing CompanyInfusion Brewing CompanyRotary Club of West Pasco SunsetKevin TrappMs. MannsPatricia Klee2025 Kentucky Derby Pub Crawl▶ Jump to 44:33 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:44:33] Yes, we will. [00:44:35] And the applicant for this event is the Rotary Club of West Pasco Sunset. [00:44:44] The event is scheduled for Saturday, May 3rd. [00:44:48] And it is to be conducted between 11 a.m. and 7 p.m. [00:44:54] And Mr. Kevin Trapp will tell you a little bit about what is going on. [00:45:00] is planned that day so that you can determine whether or not it's appropriate to allow the [00:45:08] special event permit application and to establish a wet zone request to support the application. [00:45:16] Thank you, Ms. Manns. [00:45:17] Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Councilmembers. [00:45:20] Staff is requesting City Council's approval for the 2025 Kentucky Derby Pub Crawl event, [00:45:25] which includes reviewing and considering approval for the submitted alcohol beverage special [00:45:29] event application and wet zone requests. [00:45:31] The special events team met with the event organizer, Patricia Klee, at the regular set [00:45:36] meeting on Tuesday, March 25th. [00:45:39] This event is being held on Saturday, May 3rd, from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m., and it is a fundraiser [00:45:44] for the Rotary Club of West Pasco Sunset. [00:45:47] The event will kick off as a walking pub crawl to local participating downtown businesses, [00:45:52] and event participants will unpack at Infusion Brewing Company in the alleyway located behind [00:45:56] the brewery. [00:45:57] The alleyway will have seating spread out under 10 by 10 tents, a small stage for entertainment, [00:46:02] variety of derby-themed games, and a viewing area to watch the Kentucky Derby. [00:46:07] The requested wet zone is only for the alleyway behind Infusion Brewing Company for the consumption [00:46:13] of alcohol during the hours of 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. [00:46:17] Public parking in the Gloria Swanson parking lot will not be impacted by this event. [00:46:21] A safety plan has been discussed with the event organizers, which includes police presence [00:46:25] during the event, as well as barricades placed in the alleyway to ensure the event is safe [00:46:31] for all attendees. [00:46:32] The set group has no objections to the event application and requests to establish a wet [00:46:37] zone as noted in the attached wet zone map. [00:46:40] Staff is recommending approval of the 2025 Kentucky Derby pub crawl alcoholic beverage [00:46:45] special event application, as well as establishing a wet zone in the alleyway behind Infusion [00:46:51] Brewing Company between the hours of 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Saturday, May 3rd. [00:46:56] Myself and event organizers, which are in attendance tonight, are available to answer [00:47:00] any questions you may have. [00:47:01] Do we have any public comment? [00:47:02] I don't see Trish getting up. [00:47:03] Bring it back for discussion. [00:47:04] Move for approval? [00:47:05] I'll second. [00:47:06] To the maker? [00:47:07] It's a great event. [00:47:08] I used to go to it when it was in New Port Richey. [00:47:09] It's a great event. [00:47:10] I used to go to it when it was in New Port Richey. [00:47:11] It's a great event. [00:47:12] I used to go to it when it was in New Port Richey. [00:47:13] It's a great event. [00:47:14] I used to go to it when it was in New Port Richey. [00:47:15] It's a great event. [00:47:16] It's a great event. [00:47:18] I used to go to it when it was in New Port Richey, so we kind of swiped it from them over there. [00:47:22] I've got the mayor sitting here, so I'm just digging at him a little bit, but no, it's [00:47:27] a great event, and it's really fun. [00:47:30] And two council members. [00:47:31] No, from there. [00:47:32] From New Port Richey. [00:47:33] Oh, that's true. [00:47:34] We'll try to take it back. [00:47:35] That's why they're here tonight. [00:47:36] Second? [00:47:37] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:38] Let's keep up the community good work. [00:47:39] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:40] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:41] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:42] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:43] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:44] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:45] I think it's a great thing. [00:47:47] Anybody involved?
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.c
Request to Waive Permit Fees for Richard Miller, 6129 Lafayette St.
approvedRichard Miller requested a waiver of $1,109 in building permit fees for hurricane-related repairs to his home at 6129 Lafayette St., arguing extenuating circumstances delayed his ability to apply before the city's hurricane fee waiver program ended January 15, 2025. Staff recommended denial citing precedent concerns, FEMA penalties already incurred ($136,416 in lost reimbursements), and fairness to 57 other property owners who paid fees. Council passed a motion to reduce his fees by 50% rather than fully waive or deny.
- motion:Motion to reduce Richard Miller's permit fees by 50%. (passed)4–0
6129 Lafayette St.Aqua Harbor ProjectClendon Web InsuranceFEMAFountain Group AdjustersDaleDebbie ManzJim KarakibusJoe BirdMattPeteRichard MillerCRA permit fee waiver policyFEMA reimbursement penaltyHurricane HeleneHurricane permit fee waiver program (Sep 26, 2024 – Jan 15, 2025)▶ Jump to 47:48 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:47:48] Matt? [00:47:49] Pete? [00:47:50] Pete. [00:47:51] Pete. [00:47:52] Yeah. [00:47:53] It's a small area, and it's certainly not a big expenditure, and it's being suggested [00:47:58] for approval, so I'm in. [00:48:01] Yeah, and I thank the Rotary for bringing it here, and I know the Rotarian money will [00:48:06] go back into the community, so that's really great, too. [00:48:08] All those in favor, signify by aye. [00:48:11] Aye. [00:48:12] Those opposed, we have four to one. [00:48:14] Four to nothing. [00:48:15] Four to nothing, excuse me. [00:48:16] Four and one missing. [00:48:19] Okay, request for a waiver permit for the fees for the Richard Miller 6129 Lafayette [00:48:29] Drive. [00:48:30] Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, as you're aware, Mr. Miller has requested a fee waiver [00:48:39] related to damage sustained at his personal residence as a result of Hurricane Helene. [00:48:47] As you're also aware, the city did have in place a program which provided for a waiver [00:48:53] of building permit fees as a result of repairs that needed to be tended to that were caused [00:49:03] by hurricanes. [00:49:04] That program was in place for three and a half months, and it was initiated on September [00:49:11] 26th of 2024, and it spanned through January 15th of 2025. [00:49:19] The program, the impetus for the program was really to help struggling homeowners that [00:49:28] were trying to identify what funding sources were available and financing those necessary [00:49:38] home repairs. [00:49:40] It wasn't a program that we could sustain over a long period of time. [00:49:46] We found, in fact, that the city was penalized by FEMA for offering such a program. [00:49:53] The city did learn over the course of time that both FEMA and homeowners insurance do [00:50:02] pay the cost associated with obtaining permits. [00:50:08] The city currently is experiencing a good amount of overtime costs in keeping up with [00:50:14] the processing of permits, which makes it not a favorable time to be waiving permits [00:50:20] anymore. [00:50:23] The city has experienced a loss of revenue in the amount of $136,416 during the course [00:50:34] of time that we did waive permits, and you can times that by two because FEMA penalty [00:50:44] compensated us for having done so and reduced our reimbursable expenses by that amount because [00:50:56] of our practice of waiving the permit fees. [00:51:06] I think that it's such a bad precedent for you to waive permit fees at this time. [00:51:11] You have established perimeters for the administration by ending the program, and we have been enforcing [00:51:20] the standards equally since that time. [00:51:24] There have been 57 other property owners since the program ended that have paid the fees [00:51:32] associated with their permit fees. [00:51:37] Mr. Miller is reconstructing his home to the tune of $97,992. [00:51:47] His permit fees are $1,109. [00:51:55] It may not seem like a big number in terms of permit fees, but the precedent, I think, [00:52:02] is really bad to set, and I think it would be really unfair to the other property owners [00:52:07] that have paid their permit fees, and so I'm recommending that you don't waive the permit [00:52:14] fees submitted by Mr. Miller. [00:52:17] And if you have any questions about the program or related to this agenda item, I'm prepared [00:52:23] to respond to that. [00:52:24] Mr. Miller, come on down. [00:52:25] Can I speak now? [00:52:26] Yeah, exactly. [00:52:27] That's exactly what I want. [00:52:28] I introduced myself before, do you want me to do it again? [00:52:42] Richard Miller, 6129 Lafayette. [00:52:47] I'm sitting here, I'm frankly very stunned that Debbie just gave a report before I gave [00:52:54] my spiel and shot me down. [00:52:59] I have a correction to her, I spoke with my FEMA adjusters today, they do not reimburse [00:53:07] for fees, I was told, okay? [00:53:13] Now I passed out, bear with me here a minute. [00:53:21] I have a serious lung problem, so if you read through the letter that I put in here, [00:53:29] I was in Ohio when the storm hit, our neighbors called and said the house had 4 feet of water. [00:53:37] I immediately notified FEMA and filed a claim. [00:53:41] I called a friend to come to Ohio and drive me to Florida. [00:53:45] We were notified Joe Bird was assigned as my adjuster. [00:53:51] A meeting was set for October 4th, 2024. [00:53:56] The meeting on 10-4, viewing the damages, was difficult due to the extensive damage [00:54:04] and water doors were all broken, furniture upside down, when we opened the front door, [00:54:12] I had never seen anything like it, the mold was just unbelievable. [00:54:17] With my lungs, I got the hell out of there quick. [00:54:24] The adjuster would not even go into the garage as that was worse than the rest of the house [00:54:32] and all the doors were broken. [00:54:35] So he passed on that. [00:54:48] Mold was just solid coverage on each and every upside piece of furniture, it was all leather, [00:54:55] very expensive furniture and wood products. [00:55:02] The attached emails which are in your folder require some study because there is a timeline. [00:55:09] I lost contact with Joe Bird, my adjuster, and on occasions I had to go through the main [00:55:20] office to have him call me, he got to the point where he was getting a little snotty. [00:55:30] You can see on one, he's telling me how I should spend my Thanksgiving doing his project. [00:55:40] So anyway, out of frustration with him, I contacted the employer which is the Fountain [00:55:51] Group Adjusters and was referred to their senior field supervisor, Mr. Jim Karakibus. [00:56:02] He was an elderly gentleman and he immediately claimed my temporary residence to help us [00:56:09] assemble the necessary information. [00:56:14] As text messages show, there was lost control with Jim after December 1st. [00:56:26] We came to find out that he had had a health issue and was in a coma for a couple of weeks [00:56:32] here in Florida and he's out of Alabama, I think they eventually sent him back home. [00:56:37] But in that time frame, we had no correspondence going. [00:56:43] I finally contacted Clendon Web Insurance, my local company that wrote the policy, and [00:56:50] they were very helpful with my getting the check. [00:56:54] The check was issued after the first week of January. [00:57:01] Upon receiving this, I contacted my contractor and entered into a contract. [00:57:12] Due to my delays, I was unable to be signed in for immediate restoration and have had [00:57:19] to wait until they get their lines cleaned and their projects finished up. [00:57:27] Please note the text message from Jim Karakibus dated April 25th. [00:57:33] That was from December to April that I had no contact with him because he was in the [00:57:37] hospital and laid up. [00:57:39] I feel there are extenuating circumstances here. [00:57:43] I don't agree with Ms. Manz that it's a hardship on the city. [00:57:50] I've been here 32 years. [00:57:52] I've had a first-came policy the whole time I've been here. [00:57:57] Over three inspectors looked at my house when it hit December 31st, went through the house [00:58:08] at no time did anyone tell me that we had a race to get the permits filed. [00:58:15] I was not going to file a permit without getting my funds. [00:58:20] Nobody's going to do that. [00:58:21] I couldn't enter into a contract until I received my check. [00:58:25] And I'll close off with that. [00:58:26] I just hope that you folks, before you just arbitrarily vote on this, you look at this. [00:58:35] This city should not be charging fees when a disaster comes. [00:58:40] And I know there's federal and there's state funds available to cover that kind of crap. [00:58:45] So I'm just a little disappointed. [00:58:48] I've enjoyed this. [00:58:49] I love this place. [00:58:50] I've been here for 32 years, hope to go a couple more. [00:58:56] And with that I'll give a closing. [00:58:58] Thank you for hearing me. [00:59:00] on your new jobs, I guess, okay? [00:59:06] Thank you. [00:59:07] Anybody else would like to speak? [00:59:15] I'll bring it back for discussion and vote. [00:59:19] I'll give it a shot. [00:59:21] So what we heard in the explanation was that we were not receiving reimbursement for expenses [00:59:28] related to permits because we did not charge for permits, is that correct? [00:59:35] That we were penalized. [00:59:36] We were penalized for waiving permit fees, yes, that's correct. [00:59:40] Can you quantify that in terms of what that meant to us? [00:59:44] That means $136,416, which is the amount of money that we lost on permit fees, had to [00:59:51] be reported to FEMA and they reduced our reimbursable expenses like [01:00:00] picking up storm-related debris from that reimbursement form, they would reduce our [01:00:09] reimbursables by that amount as well. [01:00:14] So because we didn't charge, well thank you, that's good, that's a good explanation, [01:00:21] but because we didn't collect money, which we don't have, they are refusing to give us [01:00:30] other money that were related to cleanup. [01:00:34] That's the principle, yes. [01:00:37] And many other cities across the area were affected in the same way. [01:00:41] So we had a policy, we took our lickens, and the gentleman has a small $2,000 permit request, [01:00:51] and because we, are there further repercussions for us at this point? [01:01:00] No. [01:01:01] So I think the penalties we paid, we've paid. [01:01:05] The policy that we put in place, we did provide to a lot of people. [01:01:10] And so to the degree that this gentleman has come forward, I've got some empathy. [01:01:15] I appreciate your comment, but I don't know how many more permits are coming, but I know [01:01:20] we did terminate the program. [01:01:22] We had an action up here that we said, don't do it anymore. [01:01:29] He certainly makes his argument, and so he spent a good bit of effort, and I'm not sure [01:01:34] that it costs us any more than just to continue to lose permit fees. [01:01:38] As long as we're not penalized, I'm somewhat inclined. [01:01:43] Can I just interject? [01:01:45] You asked about repercussions. [01:01:46] One of the possible repercussions of something like this is that others may come forward [01:01:51] and request the same thing. [01:01:52] Yeah, I'm aware of that. [01:01:54] And you will have to treat everybody like him in the same way. [01:01:57] So that may open the door to other claims. [01:02:00] That's all. [01:02:01] That would be my caution. [01:02:02] Oh, so you're suggesting the legal interpretation is that once we do it, we do it for everybody? [01:02:07] No. [01:02:08] No, I mean, everyone has to make an appeal. [01:02:10] They have to come here and make an appeal. [01:02:11] So I appreciate it. [01:02:13] Thank you. [01:02:14] Thank you. [01:02:15] That's fine. [01:02:18] So let me change gears then. [01:02:23] We have a program that we've used in redevelopment efforts, which is to have the CRA pay, or [01:02:30] has been suggested, and I don't know that we've done it, but have the CRA pay permit [01:02:34] fees. [01:02:35] I know it was recommended that we do that for the Aqua Harbor Project in some degree. [01:02:41] So I think my question is, did the Aqua Harbor Project pay the city for the permit fees, [01:02:47] for the permits that they have taken for the construction of that facility? [01:02:51] The Aqua Harbor Project did not ask for waiver of permit fees as part of their economic development [01:03:03] incentive package, and nor have they been approved by the CRA to receive that. [01:03:09] Okay, so they're not asking for that. [01:03:12] They're not asking for permit fees to be waived? [01:03:14] No. [01:03:15] Okay. [01:03:16] Well, that's what I just wanted to make sure that, you know, when we're talking about whatever [01:03:19] angle there is for this gentleman to collect from. [01:03:25] So I'll leave it as one person. [01:03:27] I'll leave it to my colleagues to decide, because I'd be curious to see what anyone [01:03:32] else has to say about this. [01:03:34] I have a question for Dale. [01:03:36] Could he have started the permitting maybe without the whole package ready to go? [01:03:42] Like, you know, say, I've got this damage and I've gotten assessed. [01:03:46] Is there an entry level that he could have done before the 15th? [01:03:53] When the plans are sufficient, which are complete, they can be submitted at any time after the [01:04:00] hurricane or any time in development process. [01:04:03] But we, at this time, nor do I recommend that we take partial building plans in to [01:04:09] review for permitting. [01:04:11] So it's basically all or nothing. [01:04:12] You put your full package together and then you submit for a permit. [01:04:19] But if I may add, that has nothing to do with the hurricane. [01:04:21] That's basic practice in planning permitting and development. [01:04:27] All right, this is the tough one. [01:04:31] Welcome to City Council. [01:04:32] Yeah, thanks Peter. [01:04:33] Yeah. [01:04:34] So, I mean, I work in the construction industry, so I'm familiar with permitting and those [01:04:41] things. [01:04:43] And it's a tough call, because I understand the ramifications. [01:04:46] If we do it for one, then other people are going to ask for it. [01:04:49] So how do we make it fair for one person, but not for everybody? [01:04:53] And then, as Debbie said, the 57 people who have paid already, are they going to come [01:04:57] back to us and say, do I get a discount? [01:05:00] Do I get my money back? [01:05:02] I understand. [01:05:04] I used to do flood work. [01:05:06] I understand it takes time. [01:05:09] And when you're not involved in it every day, this is what happens. [01:05:14] They push you off. [01:05:16] And then now you're stuck in the position that you don't, you know, you've got to pay [01:05:20] this permit fee because the program is over. [01:05:23] And that's unfortunate. [01:05:25] But it's a tough call. [01:05:27] It really is. [01:05:29] Yeah. [01:05:30] Yeah, the 57 people who haven't, who did pay, I mean, it could turn into, you know, [01:05:37] if we gave them $1,000, that could be $57,000 for those people coming forward. [01:05:44] I'm going to suggest something, and maybe we'll see. [01:05:51] I don't think that 57 people are going to come forward, necessarily, but it could happen. [01:05:56] But I'm going to make a motion to cut his fees to 50%. [01:06:01] And then we'll see how that goes. [01:06:05] I'll second your motion. [01:06:06] All right. [01:06:10] Any comment on it? [01:06:11] No. [01:06:12] Do you want to comment on it? [01:06:13] No, I think it's a rightful attempt to try to provide a partial solution. [01:06:20] And so I'm in. [01:06:23] All those in favor signify by aye. [01:06:25] Aye. [01:06:26] Aye. [01:06:27] Those opposed, 4-0. [01:06:32] Yes. [01:06:33] Sure. [01:06:34] You have to come up to, because it's got to go on record. [01:06:39] Mr. Mayor, point of order. [01:06:42] Point of order. [01:06:43] We had someone else in the audience who asked to speak for a while with their hand up. [01:06:46] So if that's the case, we're opening it up again. [01:06:50] Well, it has to do with this particular thing. [01:06:52] I don't understand the fee process. [01:06:55] That you'll have to take up with the city manager, sir. [01:06:58] No, but the point I'm going to make is the whole project is basically putting it back together. [01:07:06] There's no new structural nothing other than the electrical wiring got salt water.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.d
Memorandum of Agreement w/IAFF, Local 1158 RE: Wage Increases for FY 2024-2025
approvedCity Council ratified a tentative agreement with IAFF Local 1158 providing a 5% wage increase for firefighters for FY 2024-2025, retroactive to October 1, 2024, as part of a wage re-opener in the current collective bargaining agreement. The financial impact was already accounted for in the FY 2024-2025 budget.
- motion:Motion to approve and ratify the negotiated wage agreement with IAFF Local 1158 providing a 5% wage increase for FY 2024-2025, retroactive to October 1, 2024. (passed)
International Association of Firefighters, Local 1158MattMr. WetzelMs. MannsAppendix A wage stepsFY 2024-2025 wage re-openerIAFF Local 1158 collective bargaining agreement▶ Jump to 1:07:09 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:07:13] So I understand that has to be replaced. [01:07:17] How about we just buy an electrical permit? [01:07:21] The rest of the house is as is. [01:07:24] Decision, sir. [01:07:25] Pardon me? [01:07:26] We've already made a decision, sir. [01:07:27] You have? [01:07:28] Yes. [01:07:29] Oh, I'm sorry. [01:07:30] I didn't hear you. [01:07:31] Yeah. [01:07:32] I heard one and one and one. [01:07:33] Is that it? [01:07:34] That's it. [01:07:35] Yeah. [01:07:36] Okay. [01:07:37] You got it for half price. [01:07:38] All right. [01:07:39] With LAFE Local 1158, the wage increases for the fire department. [01:07:51] There's a lady in the back that had a comment. [01:07:52] Yes. [01:07:53] Does that have to do with what's going on? [01:07:59] Yes. [01:08:00] That's done. [01:08:01] That's done. [01:08:02] That's done. [01:08:03] She had her hand up for 15 minutes. [01:08:07] I asked earlier if anybody else would like to speak and no one got up. [01:08:11] Sorry. [01:08:12] Memorandum of agreement with the IAFF Local 1158, wage increases of Florida 2024-2025. [01:08:26] All right. [01:08:27] The purpose of this agenda item is we're seeking ratification of a tentative agreement that [01:08:33] was reached with the International Association of Firefighters as part of a wage re-opener [01:08:40] for the contract year 2024-2025. [01:08:46] Mr. Wetzel will further present the agenda item. [01:08:50] Thank you, Ms. Manns. [01:08:52] The request before City Council is to vote affirmatively in favor of ratifying the proposed [01:08:58] agreement reached between the City of New Port Richey and the International Association of Firefighters, [01:09:03] IAFF Local 1158 for a wage increase covering fiscal year 2024-2025. [01:09:11] The proposed agreement was reached as part of a wage re-opener in the current collective [01:09:16] bargaining agreement with the IAFF Local 1158. [01:09:20] After several positive negotiation meetings with the firefighters, the staff is pleased [01:09:25] to present to you a proposed final agreement that has been reached between the City and [01:09:30] the IAFF regarding wages for fiscal year 2024-2025. [01:09:35] The following highlights the terms that have been agreed to upon by the union and the city [01:09:40] negotiating teams. [01:09:41] The term is as follows. [01:09:43] Wages for fiscal year 2024-2025. [01:09:47] The steps reflected in Appendix A of the current collective bargaining agreement shall be replaced [01:09:54] and increased by 5% from fiscal year 2023-2024. [01:10:02] The increase will be retroactive to October 1, 2024. [01:10:07] The recommendation from staff is for City Council to vote in favor of the wage increase [01:10:13] and ratify the proposed agreement as part of the current collective bargaining agreement [01:10:18] with the IAFF Local 1158. [01:10:21] With respect to the financial and fiscal impact, the financial impact associated with this [01:10:27] agenda item was anticipated and accounted for in the fiscal year 2024-2025 budget. [01:10:35] There are no additional funds or amendments necessary to the fiscal year 2024-2025 budget [01:10:42] to fund this item. [01:10:44] With that, if there's any questions, myself or Ms. Manns will be glad to answer them for you. [01:10:48] Do you have anything else you want to add? [01:10:50] No, not at this point, Mr. Mayor. [01:10:52] Do we have any public comment? [01:10:55] Seeing no one come forward, we'll bring it back for discussion and vote. [01:10:59] Mr. Mayor, I'll make a motion to approve the negotiated agreement as presented. [01:11:05] Do we have a second? [01:11:06] I'll second it. [01:11:07] To the maker? [01:11:08] No, sir. [01:11:09] We had a lot of work done and it's an agreement that will keep us intact and know what we're [01:11:19] doing for the next year and I think it's fair to the officers and fair to the city. [01:11:26] I agree. [01:11:27] Matt? [01:11:28] Yeah, we talked about it and it's something that both sides agree with and it's going [01:11:34] to keep our men and women in uniform here instead of maybe straying other places, too. [01:11:39] So we want to keep our good people here with us. [01:11:42] No addition to the budget. [01:11:44] All those in favor, signify by aye. [01:11:46] Aye. [01:11:47] Aye. [01:11:48] Opposed, nothing. [01:11:49] Consideration of appointments for interlocal committees.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.e
Consideration of Appointments to Intergovernmental Committees
approvedCouncil confirmed appointments to intergovernmental committees: Councilman Butler (absent) to continue on Suncoast League of Cities and as alternate on Pasco County MPO; another member to continue on Tampa Bay Water; the Resiliency steering committee chair to continue; and Councilman Jonas to take the open Tourist Development Council seat previously held by Kelly. Motion passed 4-0.
- motion:Appoint Councilman Jonas to the open Tourist Development Council seat and retain all other current councilmember committee assignments, including Butler on Suncoast League of Cities and as alternate on Pasco County MPO. (passed)4–0
ButlerJonasKellyPetePasco County Metropolitan Planning OrganizationResiliency steering committeeSuncoast League of CitiesTampa Bay WaterTourist Development Council▶ Jump to 1:11:50 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:11:51] How do we go about this? [01:11:53] If you'd allow me, Mr. Mayor, since Councilman Butler had to leave, I'd like to remind you [01:12:01] that he currently serves on the Suncoast League of Cities and is an alternate at the Pasco [01:12:07] County Metropolitan Planning Organization and he did indicate to me that he'd like [01:12:12] to continue to serve in that capacity if it meets with your collective approvals. [01:12:18] And I'll just add that I've been involved with the Tampa Bay Water and I went in knowing [01:12:24] a lot and found out that I didn't know a lot also. [01:12:27] So I've learned a lot and I think I'm an asset to the board there, so I'd like to [01:12:32] stay with the Tampa Bay Water. [01:12:34] What committee was Kelly on? [01:12:37] Was it Tourist Development Council? [01:12:39] Tourist Development. [01:12:40] Was that something you? [01:12:41] I was going to pick up where she left off. [01:12:43] Okay. [01:12:44] That makes it easy then. [01:12:45] Are you happy where you're at, Pete? [01:12:47] I'm Mr. Resiliency right now, so I'm chair of that organization's steering committee [01:12:54] so I would love to stay on it and finish off my position. [01:12:59] So are you satisfied? [01:13:03] I'll make a motion that based on the comments by our city manager as to the preference [01:13:12] of the individual who is not here, that the open spot goes to Councilman Jonas and that [01:13:20] the remainder of us keep our positions as we have them. [01:13:24] I'll second that. [01:13:25] All those in favor, signify by aye. [01:13:27] Aye. [01:13:28] So that's four nothing. [01:13:29] Everybody's happy. [01:13:30] Okay. [01:13:31] Approval of the Florida Humanities Summer Reading Grant Award Agreement. [01:13:40] The staff at our public library has been awarded a grant from the Florida Humanities in the
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.f
Approval of Florida Humanities Summer Reading Grant Award Agreement
approvedCouncil approved a $3,000 Florida Humanities Summer Reading Grant Award Agreement allowing the library to purchase children's books for the mobile library branch. No additional city budget is required, and tasks must be completed by September 15 with a final report to Florida Humanities.
- motion:Approve the Florida Humanities Summer Reading Grant Award Agreement allowing the library to enter into the grant agreement. (passed)4–0
Florida Humanities OrganizationFeigartManzFlorida Humanities Summer Reading GrantMobile Library Branch▶ Jump to 1:13:43 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:13:52] amount of $3,000 to purchase some children's books and I'll let Ms. Feigart tell you how [01:13:59] she'd like to use that $3,000. [01:14:02] Thank you, City Manager Manz. [01:14:04] Good evening, Mayor and City Council. [01:14:06] The request before you tonight is to approve the Summer Reading Grant Award in the amount [01:14:11] of $3,000 and allow the library to enter into a grant agreement with the Florida Humanities [01:14:19] Organization. [01:14:20] Every year, the Florida Humanities provides funding to public libraries in the form of [01:14:26] a Summer Reading Grant. [01:14:28] Through a competitive grant process, an award committee chooses several libraries throughout [01:14:35] the state and awards these funds and the funds are designated to support summer reading [01:14:42] initiatives that complement the collaborative summer reading theme and, of course, support [01:14:48] early literacy by providing children more access to books. [01:14:53] If approved, these books will be added to the mobile library branch. [01:15:00] and they will include titles of board books, picture books, beginning readers, [01:15:08] early chapter books, juvenile nonfiction, in a variety of titles. All tasks [01:15:16] must be performed by September 15th of this year, at which time a final report [01:15:22] will be given to the Florida Humanities Organization. It's recommended that City [01:15:27] Council allow the library to enter into this grant agreement, and no additional [01:15:34] budget is required. Any public comment? Seeing no one come forward, we'll bring it [01:15:42] back for discussion and vote. Move approval. See, we're going at it. Second? [01:15:54] I think it's great. Keep the youth in the library. Hey, education in all [01:16:00] directions. All those in favor signify by aye. Aye. It's 4-0. Request for [01:16:06] rezoning Edgewater Gardens subdivision M8. We have a few guests in attendance now for [01:16:14] Monarch City Day. If we could go back and do that proclamation now in advance of the rezoning [01:16:23] discussion, that would be greatly appreciated. I know we have one young [01:16:29] guest in attendance. Looks like she's getting a little weary.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 8
Proclamation - Monarch City Day
approvedMayor Chopper Davis read a proclamation designating May 3, 2025 as Monarch City Day in New Port Richey, recognizing the City's designation as a Monarch City by Monarch City USA and promoting native milkweed planting. A representative of the Environmental Committee accepted the proclamation and announced a Monarch Day celebration at the Public Library on May 3 from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.
- direction:Mayor proclaimed May 3, 2025 as Monarch City Day in the City of New Port Richey. (passed)
Monarch City USANew Port Richey Environmental CommitteeNew Port Richey Farmers MarketNew Port Richey Public LibraryServPro Team GeorgeAmandaChopper DavisLilyMargaretMonarch City DayMonarch City designationMonarch Day (May 3, 2025)▶ Jump to 1:16:49 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:16:53] This is a proclamation of the Office of the Mayor of the City of New Port Richey, [01:17:05] whereas the monarch butterfly is an iconic North American species whose [01:17:10] multi-generational migration and metamorphosis from caterpillar to [01:17:14] butterfly has captured the imagination of millions of Americans young and old, [01:17:18] and whereas over the past 20 years there has been a massive decline in insect [01:17:23] populations worldwide and a catastrophic decline in monarch [01:17:26] populations, leading to monarchs now being on the list of endangered species, [01:17:31] and whereas the monarch is also extremely beneficial, pollinating many [01:17:36] cultivated flowers and crops, and serves as an indicator species for the [01:17:40] ecological health of large geographic areas, and whereas cities, towns, and [01:17:45] counties have a critical role to play to help save the monarch butterfly, and the [01:17:50] City of New Port Richey has committed to the principles and ideals necessary to [01:17:54] be designated as a Monarch City by Monarch City USA, a nonprofit organization [01:18:00] dedicated to helping the monarch butterfly recover city by city, and [01:18:05] whereas every resident of New Port Richey can make a difference for the monarch by [01:18:09] planting native milkweed and nectar plants to provide habitat for the monarch [01:18:13] and pollinators in locations where people live, work, learn, play, and worship, and [01:18:19] whereas to celebrate the City's designation as a Monarch City and its [01:18:23] sustained commitment to ecological regeneration, the New Port Richey Farm Net, [01:18:28] the Environmental Committee, the Public Library, ServPro Team George, and [01:18:33] various local groups, businesses, and individuals will present the City's [01:18:37] annual Monarch Day on Saturday, May 3, at 11 a.m. at the library. Now therefore, I, [01:18:43] Chopper Davis, Mayor of the City of New Port Richey, do hereby proclaim May 3, 2025, [01:18:48] as Monarch City Day in the City of New Port Richey and encourage all [01:18:52] residents to plant and protect native milkweed and nectar sources so that [01:18:58] monarch butterflies have the resources necessary to produce successive [01:19:03] generations. [01:19:18] We're honored on behalf of the New Port Richey Environmental Committee of the City. We're [01:19:23] honored to receive this proclamation. We will be hosting a monarch butterfly [01:19:29] celebration at the library on May 3rd from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. so hopefully you [01:19:38] can spread the word about that just like butterflies spread their wings. The [01:19:43] beautiful City of New Port Richey is undergoing a wonderful metamorphosis. [01:19:48] We're undergoing a wonderful transformation just like the butterflies [01:19:53] go through from being a caterpillar they turn into beautiful butterflies and like [01:19:58] the mayor shared they endure and travel many many miles. So hopefully we can [01:20:05] also be like the monarch butterfly and you know be as resilient as they are and [01:20:12] as sustainable while undergoing beautiful changes to better our city. We [01:20:18] are honored to receive this. We have other members of the Environmental [01:20:23] Committee here that we have we have Margaret and Amanda and Lily and Lily [01:20:29] will be passing out cards about the monarch event after the City Council [01:20:35] meeting. Thank you all so much and we will have some also on the table outside. [01:20:43] Thank you. Any questions see us after the meeting. Thank you again. Thank you City [01:20:48] Council. We appreciate you appreciate this. Much respect. [01:20:54] Oh okay request for the rezoning of Edgewater Gardens subdivision from MHP [01:21:09] to R4. Members of Council, the staff wanted to hold a discussion with you [01:21:15] this evening about the possibility of rezoning the Edgewater Gardens
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.g
You arrived here from a search for “Pasco County Tax Assessor” — transcript expanded below
Request to Rezone Edgewater Gardens Subdivision - MHP to R-4
approvedStaff requested authorization to pursue rezoning of the Edgewater Gardens subdivision (97 city lots west of US 19 off Manor Beach Road) from Mobile Home Park (MHP) to R-4 Coastal Cottage. The change would allow single-family home redevelopment on the small lots without numerous variances and accommodate FEMA flood elevation requirements (AE 10/11) following Hurricanes Helene and Milton. Council authorized staff to proceed with preparing the rezoning ordinance.
- motion:Authorize the city manager to engage staff in preparation of the zoning modification (MHP to R-4) for the Edgewater Gardens subdivision as presented. (passed)
Edgewater Gardens Subdivision, off Manor Beach Road, west of US 19Leiser Lane (Town and Country Villas)Town and Country VillasMr. HallMs. MannsFEMA 50% substantial damage/improvement ruleFEMA AE-10/AE-11 flood zonesHurricane HeleneHurricane MiltonLand Development Review Board (LDRB)MDR-14 future land useMHP (Mobile Home Park) zoning districtPasco County Tax AssessorR-3 zoning standardsR-4 Coastal Cottage zoning▶ Jump to 1:21:18 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:21:20] subdivision in advance of preparing an ordinance or taking it to the Land [01:21:25] Development Review Board and in that respect Mr. Hall has prepared a [01:21:30] PowerPoint presentation. Mr. Hall. Thank you Ms. Manns. This this presentation is [01:21:38] a little longer than I typically have. There's going to be several maps and [01:21:42] data but by the end of the presentation I'll be tying them all together. It's [01:21:45] important to know background and data as I move through this. This is not a [01:21:49] rezoning hearing. This is a request for the City Council to allow for the [01:21:54] creation and future consideration of an ordinance to rezone Edgewater Gardens [01:21:59] from Mobile Home Park to Cottage Gardens which is R4 and we'll be pulling this up [01:22:06] in just a moment. [01:22:19] The property that we're speaking about is located west of US 19 off of Manor [01:22:26] Beach Road. It's surrounded on three sides by Oyster Creek or the bayou and [01:22:31] it's an isolated property that does not abut city boundaries and you'll see that [01:22:36] in further slides here. The Edgewater Gardens Unit 1 was platted in 1959 which [01:22:46] is prior to the adoption of the city code. There are 99 individual lots within [01:22:53] this subdivision. The majority, well the average of these are about 40 foot by [01:22:58] 80 foot which is about 3,200 square feet. There are multiple lots that are smaller [01:23:04] than that and some that are larger. The existing zoning, and you see this area [01:23:19] here is what we're speaking of, it is an island not in terms of land form but [01:23:27] it's an island in form in terms of connectivity to the city. It's more, it is [01:23:32] a peninsula somewhat, is actually zoned MHP which is which is mobile home [01:23:39] property. A mobile home park is actually defined within our code is a [01:23:49] mobile home park shall mean any plot or grant of ground upon which two or more [01:23:55] mobile homes occupied for dwelling or sleeping purposes are located. [01:24:01] That's from our code, our definitions. It also says the minimum lot sizes shall [01:24:07] not be less than 4,000 square feet. They shall be 40 foot minimum lot width. The [01:24:14] setback shall be 10 feet between the units because mobile home parks [01:24:19] technically are not individual lots. They're one giant lot with mobile homes [01:24:25] placed within that lot and there's specifically no [01:24:30] architectural elements that are required on mobile home parks. And I'll come back [01:24:36] to all this and pull it back together but I want to give you some data to [01:24:39] start with. The future land use is MDR 14 which will remain unchanged if we pursue [01:24:45] this request. This slide here, you see the area outline in red, shows the special [01:24:56] flood hazard area within that portion of the city and county area. It is AE 10 [01:25:04] which means that's the base flood elevation of that area out there and the [01:25:12] elevation of that property from the maps in the Pasco County Tax [01:25:19] Assessor are five foot or less. So any future development would be required if [01:25:27] it came through to be developed, and I'll explain in some more detail later, would [01:25:30] have to be built one foot above the base flood elevation of 10. So you're speaking [01:25:38] of any future development or any replacement homes and there would be six [01:25:42] feet in the air from where they're presently. Can you explain why that says [01:25:46] 11 when you say 10? Yes, because there's a little, takes a little bit of time for this, [01:25:52] this is AE 11 right here on this side. Between this line and this line is AE 10. [01:26:01] This little portion here is X zone which means it's not defined yet. They [01:26:06] don't have a, it hasn't been calculated out. And there's a little bitty right [01:26:09] there. This is AE 19. So all of this property has base flood elevation which [01:26:18] means if it's redeveloped as a residential property it has to be one [01:26:23] foot above base flood elevation per FEMA requirements and city requirements. [01:26:30] Commercial can be built with, you know, in different aspects that can be [01:26:35] flood-proofed and whatnot. So the present concerns of that property that was [01:26:43] outlined in red is, first of all, the existing zoning parcels do not [01:26:49] meet the definition currently in our code of mobile home park. The existing [01:26:54] lot sizes do not meet the minimum standards of our existing mobile home [01:26:59] parks and if an individual wanted to do construction in that area they would [01:27:08] need to come in and have multiple variances with that future construction. [01:27:13] There's also flood issues as all substantially improved or substantially [01:27:18] damaged homes would need to be elevated six feet or more from the existing [01:27:23] ground. But there is a path to encourage redevelopment and that's where the [01:27:32] recommendation to go to an R4 coastal cottage. This is an existing [01:27:38] section of our code, zoning of our code, that allows for single-family homes [01:27:45] to be built on smaller lots. The minimum lot sizes are 2850. The lot widths are [01:27:54] smaller. The setbacks are more defined and smaller. There are some requirements [01:28:00] for architectural elements and I will show that. One of the key points of [01:28:04] coastal colleges, it's requiring to put parking underneath of the structure. If [01:28:09] you're actually going to raise the structure a minimum of six feet, seven [01:28:14] feet in the air, it would behoove you to use that space to park. So it's [01:28:19] part of this actual code to require that. The big thing is there'd be no need [01:28:27] for multiple variances if an individual wanted to develop as an R4. These are [01:28:33] examples of what a coastal cottage style would be. Remember the blue map that [01:28:39] showed everything that was AE10? This would be a structure that could be built [01:28:44] in the AE10. It would meet FEMA flood requirements because the base floor [01:28:49] elevation would be set up one foot above that elevation AE10. So now I'm going to [01:28:59] go through a little bit development by the numbers, specifically for this, again, [01:29:05] Edgewood Gardens area. Since Hurricane Helene and Milton, of that there's 99 [01:29:11] lots in that existing subdivision. 97 of them are in the city jurisdiction. [01:29:16] There's two that are county. I'm just pointing that out. We have had 13 [01:29:22] building permits, which means individuals came in to redo their [01:29:28] existing home there and it didn't meet the threshold of substantial [01:29:35] improvements so they could improve on their homes. And we've had six demolition [01:29:39] permits, which individuals basically, their home was damaged to such a [01:29:44] point that they just decided it would be best to demo the house and start all [01:29:49] over. There are additional permits pending. Remember all the blue? How much [01:29:55] could, how many of those, I mean that's 19 lots. [01:30:00] So there's 97 of them out there. [01:30:01] How many of those are damaged? [01:30:04] I mean, just you could guess how many are out there. [01:30:06] So individuals still, [01:30:08] we have some permits that are pending on that. [01:30:15] Here's where I try to pull it all together. [01:30:18] The MHP, which is the Mobile Home Park Zoning District, [01:30:23] requires you to put a mobile home back on those lots. [01:30:28] On those lots, that's what a mobile home park is. [01:30:32] However, there is a caveat that says, [01:30:35] or you could develop a stick built single family home [01:30:40] on those lots if they met the R3 standards. [01:30:45] Now, if we were allowed to pursue the R4 zoning, [01:30:50] individuals could come in and pull a permit [01:30:54] to build a single family house on those lots [01:31:00] with the majority of them having no variances requests. [01:31:04] They would meet the requirements that we're proposing. [01:31:07] However, if they were going to come in without it, [01:31:11] with it being mobile home park zone presently, [01:31:14] they would have to build a home on R3 standards, [01:31:19] which none of those lots would meet. [01:31:22] The lots are too small, they don't meet the setbacks, [01:31:25] or they can come in and replace their mobile home [01:31:29] with a new mobile home that needs to meet FEMA standards, [01:31:33] which means mobile home six feet or more in the air. [01:31:45] So in summary, moving forward with an R3 [01:31:50] addresses zoning issues. [01:31:52] It allows property owners to build single family homes [01:31:56] on their lots without the need of obtaining variances. [01:32:02] This rezoning category has already been established. [01:32:05] It's already within our codes. [01:32:07] We actually used, the city used, [01:32:10] the Town and Country Villas, which is Leiser Lane. [01:32:14] That is an R4. [01:32:16] That was an MHP County multi-home mobile home park [01:32:22] that was rezoned upon annexation into an R4. [01:32:28] The R4 reduces our lot sizes and setbacks [01:32:31] so these single family homes can be built. [01:32:34] The key information that is italicized here [01:32:36] is very important to understand [01:32:38] that existing homes will be allowed to remain [01:32:43] in their location until such time [01:32:46] as there's substantial damage or substantial improvement. [01:32:50] So if you had a mobile home in that Edgewater subdivision, [01:32:55] that mobile home can remain, no problems, [01:32:57] until such time as that mobile home is destroyed [01:33:01] or that mobile home needs to be renovated [01:33:04] and upgraded due to damage [01:33:06] that's 50% the value of the mobile home. [01:33:09] So this would potentially increase the property values [01:33:14] of the Edgewater subdivision [01:33:18] and then it would provide [01:33:20] with a flood-resistant neighborhood in future development. [01:33:27] So in all, I respectfully request [01:33:31] that the City Council allow for staff [01:33:35] pursue rezoning of the Edgewater Garden subdivision area [01:33:40] to R4 per existing city ordinances [01:33:45] which would include consideration by the LDRB [01:33:48] and all required public hearings through the process. [01:33:52] I'd be more than happy to answer any questions you have [01:33:55] about this proposal. [01:33:58] Yeah, Mr. Mayor, I do. [01:34:00] First thing I would say is [01:34:02] who is the owner of the mobile home park? [01:34:05] The mobile home park is 99 units or 99 lots [01:34:09] that are individually owned by multiple people. [01:34:14] It is not a mobile home park owned [01:34:16] and managed by one individual. [01:34:18] So it's technically not a mobile home park. [01:34:20] That's what I'm saying. [01:34:22] So we're asking to let you proceed [01:34:25] to propose a zoning change [01:34:28] on privately owned community [01:34:33] for the benefit of those people [01:34:34] to be able to have additional option. [01:34:36] So in that case, I'm for it. [01:34:38] I'm ready to say yes, we're losing our audience [01:34:42] but it was very insightful [01:34:45] and I think I'd like to say yes. [01:34:50] I have a question. [01:34:51] I just can't believe [01:34:53] that every one of those mobile homes didn't flood [01:34:56] and all the electricity is in the floor [01:34:58] and it's not in the ceiling. [01:35:00] So why don't we know more [01:35:01] about the flooding situation there? [01:35:04] I mean, you talked about 13 and nine [01:35:07] or something out of 97. [01:35:09] We actually went out and did a damage assessment [01:35:12] after the hurricane [01:35:13] and we have contacted those individuals [01:35:17] and actually said in letters [01:35:19] that we believe your property was flood damaged [01:35:22] and we would like to come and assist in looking at that [01:35:24] and that's where we're at in the process. [01:35:26] Through those letters being sent out [01:35:28] and the process of discussion [01:35:29] with several of those homeowners, [01:35:32] we've had discussions as some of them said [01:35:36] they didn't get any water whatsoever [01:35:38] and some of them are in the process [01:35:41] of getting paperwork submitted. [01:35:43] We've actually had also two property owners [01:35:46] that wanted demo their mobile home [01:35:49] and actually put a single family home on it [01:35:53] but there's multiple variances. [01:35:54] So we talked with them and said, [01:35:56] you can go through with that process [01:35:58] and maybe get approved. [01:35:59] I understand that. [01:36:01] I just can't understand [01:36:02] how somebody didn't get flooded there. [01:36:06] Do we have any way that we're, [01:36:07] I mean, you probably looked at it and said, [01:36:08] yeah, this has been flooded. [01:36:09] They're saying, no, we didn't. [01:36:11] Right, the blue area on the map shows the extent [01:36:15] of what we're dealing with with individuals [01:36:18] that did get flooded and not get flooded. [01:36:20] So we understand what you're asking [01:36:22] and we're working on that. [01:36:25] To the point that's requested, [01:36:26] I'll move approval to- [01:36:29] Let us ask some more questions first. [01:36:31] And don't forget to open up for public discussion. [01:36:32] Yeah, okay. [01:36:34] I have one question. [01:36:35] On the variance, do we know how many of those lots [01:36:39] would require a variance to meet the R4? [01:36:44] I didn't run the numbers on R4 [01:36:46] but I can say to actually develop an R3, [01:36:48] probably 95% of those would require variances on R3. [01:36:53] It would be very minimal handful, less than 10%, [01:36:57] depending on what they're proposing [01:36:58] on the size of the house. [01:36:59] We won't know until they submit. [01:37:00] Okay. [01:37:04] I like that it gives them some options. [01:37:07] Now, all of the ones that haven't submitted [01:37:10] are going to submit. [01:37:11] I mean, obviously they're falling under the 50% rule [01:37:14] and if they can't rebuild, [01:37:17] then they'll have to demo or rebuild [01:37:20] at the correct level, a new home. [01:37:24] Okay. [01:37:26] No, I'm just, if you want to ask for public hearing, [01:37:28] I guess before I can make a public comment. [01:37:30] Okay, do we have any public comments? [01:37:36] Seeing no one come forward. [01:37:37] So I would move to authorize the city manager [01:37:41] to engage the staff in the preparation [01:37:45] of the zoning modification on the property as presented. [01:37:50] We have a second. [01:37:51] I'll second that. [01:37:54] Second. [01:37:57] All those in favor, signify by aye.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 15.h
Memorandum of Understanding w/Tampa Bay Multi-Agency Gang Task Force
approvedCouncil approved authorizing the Chief of Police to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Tampa Bay Multi-Agency Gang Task Force (MAGTF), which allows 41 participating law enforcement agencies to share intelligence, train, and conduct joint operations against illegal gang activity. The MOU runs through May 30, 2030 and has no budget impact.
- motion:Motion to approve allowing the Chief of Police to sign the MOU with the Tampa Bay Multi-Agency Gang Task Force. (passed)4–0
New Port Richey Police DepartmentTampa Bay Multi-Agency Gang Task ForceBakerChief CochinPeteForfeiture proceeds distributionMOU with Tampa Bay Multi-Agency Gang Task Force (MAGTF)▶ Jump to 1:37:58 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:37:59] Aye. [01:38:00] That's four nothing. [01:38:02] Okay, memorandum of understanding [01:38:04] with Tampa Bay Multi-Agent Gang Task Force. [01:38:10] The agenda item will be presented by Chief Cochin. [01:38:16] Ready Chief. [01:38:17] Honorable Mayor, Council Members, [01:38:18] the request before you is to allow the Chief of Police [01:38:21] to sign the MOU with the Tampa Bay Multi-Agency Gang [01:38:24] Task Force, also known as MAGTF. [01:38:27] Currently 41 law enforcement agencies, [01:38:29] including Newport Ridge Police Department [01:38:31] are members of MAGTF. [01:38:32] This task force allows police agencies [01:38:34] across the Tampa Bay area and beyond [01:38:37] to share intelligence, train, [01:38:39] conduct multi-agency operations [01:38:41] related to legal gang activity. [01:38:43] The MOU before you outlines how forfeiture proceedings [01:38:46] from illegal activity are distributed [01:38:48] among the participating law enforcement agencies. [01:38:51] This MOU will be in effect to May 30th of 2030, [01:38:54] unless terminated prior thereto [01:38:56] by the participating agencies. [01:38:58] Our city attorney has reviewed this MOU [01:39:00] and approved it as the form. [01:39:02] And the recommendation by staff [01:39:04] is to allow the Chief of Police [01:39:05] to sign the memorandum of understanding with MAGTF. [01:39:07] There is no budget impact, [01:39:09] and I'm here to answer any questions that you may have. [01:39:11] Anybody public comment? [01:39:14] Seeing no one come forward, [01:39:15] bring it back for discussion and vote. [01:39:19] We'll do approve. [01:39:20] Second. [01:39:21] For Baker. [01:39:23] I think it's a great thing to work with other agencies. [01:39:26] I'm good, thank you. [01:39:28] Pete, no sir? [01:39:29] Yeah, ditto, I'm working together. [01:39:31] All those in favor, signify by aye. [01:39:33] Aye. [01:39:34] Those opposed, four nothing. [01:39:36] Communications, you want to start, Pete? [01:39:38] One, two, three, four. [01:39:43] To address the folks that spoke on items [01:39:45] that were not on the agenda, but are top of mind, [01:39:50] I just want to start by saying that this past weekend, [01:39:53] I attended the 50th anniversary
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 16Communications▶ 1:39:56
- 17Adjournment▶ 2:00:23
- 3
Moment of Silence
Moment of Silence.
- 5
Presentation of Years of Service Award to Deputy Mayor Kelly Mothershead
Presentation of a Years of Service Award to Deputy Mayor Kelly Mothershead.
- 13.b
Library Advisory Board Minutes - February 2025
on consentAcceptance of Library Advisory Board minutes from February 2025.