CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) board reviewed Director Iazzoni's $2.6 million FY17 proposed budget, including $950,000 for Hacienda Hotel improvements and a new building renovation program.
4 items on the agenda · 1 decision recorded
On the agenda
- 1Call to Order - Roll Call▶ 0:00
- 2
Approval of the June 21, 2016 CRA Minutes
approvedThe CRA Board approved the minutes from the June 21, 2016 CRA meeting.
- motion:Approve the June 21, 2016 CRA meeting minutes. (passed)
▶ Jump to 0:15 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:15] Next item on the agenda is the approval of the June 21 [00:00:18] CRA meeting minutes. [00:00:20] Move for approval. [00:00:21] Move the motion. [00:00:22] Second. [00:00:22] Second. [00:00:24] Any discussion? [00:00:25] No. [00:00:26] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:00:28] Aye. [00:00:28] Aye. [00:00:29] Opposed, the like sign. [00:00:30] Motion passes.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 3
You arrived here from a search for “Atelier” — transcript expanded below
FY17 Proposed Budget
discussedCRA Director Iazzoni presented the FY17 proposed CRA budget totaling approximately $2.6 million in revenue, including continued Business Incentive Grant Program funding, a new Building Expansion/Renovation Program, $950,000 for Hacienda Hotel improvements, CRA plan update, and residential incentives. Council members discussed boosting residential incentive funding and shifting strategic priorities; the item appears to have been a presentation/discussion rather than a final vote in this excerpt.
Bank Street entranceCentral AvenueOrange Lake propertyRiver Road Church propertyApplicant InsightAtelierFriends of the HaciendaHCAPDCUF Bureau of Historic ResourcesVillage PubVolk-ZimmermanWest Pasco Chamber of CommerceBert BenderCarmenCroninDanny GatosElaineIazzoniKCLaura VolkMannsStephanie FarrellWells2012 Redevelopment PlanBuilding Expansion Renovation ProgramBusiness Incentive Grant ProgramCRA Plan UpdateFY17 Proposed CRA BudgetHacienda Hotel RFPHighway 19 business mix initiativeMain Street Landing Development AgreementMarine District / Employment DistrictResidential Incentive ProgramRivergate Land DevelopmentSmartSparkSpecial Category Grant ($750,000)▶ Jump to 0:31 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:31] Next is the fiscal year 17 proposed budget. [00:00:34] Ms. Manns? [00:00:36] Mr. Iazzoni, if you could present the budget. [00:00:39] Thank you very much, City Manager Mann, [00:00:41] and thank you very much, Councilor Mayer. [00:00:47] The objective of the Community Redevelopment Agency [00:00:49] is to implement the Community Redevelopment [00:00:51] Plan, which charts a course for community redevelopment [00:00:54] and is guided by community input and vision. [00:00:58] The accomplishments for fiscal year 2016 [00:01:02] were basically the following. [00:01:04] An improved communication between redevelopment [00:01:06] stakeholders has resulted in the forward progress [00:01:09] of several development projects. [00:01:12] I highlight the areas that in the 2012 redevelopment plan, [00:01:16] it was noted specifically that there [00:01:18] needed to be strong communication between the city [00:01:21] and various city stakeholders. [00:01:22] And we very much believe, a classic example [00:01:27] is three years ago, we were very unfamiliar with what [00:01:31] was happening down in the Marine District [00:01:33] in terms of HCA's intentions with what [00:01:36] to do with that property. [00:01:37] And on several occasions and at a moment's notice, [00:01:41] HCA entertains a discussion with us all the time. [00:01:43] We have a really strong relationship with them now. [00:01:46] And they're very much an open door policy with them. [00:01:49] And this is an example where the communication [00:01:51] has been exceptionally strong. [00:01:53] West Pasco Chamber of Commerce is another example. [00:01:55] Just simply look at their Chamber of Commerce brochure. [00:01:58] And so we've made great strides with this CRA [00:02:01] to really begin to engage basically the investment [00:02:05] capital that is in the community and other organizations. [00:02:08] Another good example is Friends of the Hacienda. [00:02:10] We have an active role with them also. [00:02:14] The other accomplishment is we've implemented [00:02:18] the Business Incentive Grant Program [00:02:20] that has yielded tangible economic development results. [00:02:23] Again, as stated before, the ratio is for every dollar [00:02:26] invested, we get three out of that. [00:02:29] We've secured the Main Street Landing Development Agreement [00:02:32] and we've completed the $1.1 million work [00:02:34] to the Hacienda Hotel. [00:02:36] What we're looking at in terms of fiscal year 2017 [00:02:39] initiatives, and I have about four bullet points, [00:02:44] but I want to kind of step ahead of that and say, [00:02:46] well, in terms of an overarching theme, [00:02:49] one of the things that you're going to be looking at [00:02:50] in the budget in a few moments here is that [00:02:55] we want to continue the Business Incentive Grant Program [00:02:58] that we currently have with a much more strongest focus [00:03:02] on business facade, and I think one of the things [00:03:06] that brings out quite a bit is shade structures. [00:03:09] So we want to continue that program [00:03:11] into the next fiscal year, and we want to expand [00:03:14] that program to do what's called [00:03:16] the Building Expansion Renovation Program, [00:03:19] and in conversation with development, [00:03:22] they have several challenges with larger buildings [00:03:25] in town that really need to come up to compliance [00:03:29] and may need significant work, and we're looking [00:03:32] specifically at the town of Davie, Florida, [00:03:35] in terms of their program, where they put a much larger [00:03:38] dollar amount into a specific commercial property, [00:03:42] and again, the focus, again, would be maybe [00:03:44] to take something that's been out of plan [00:03:47] for a very long time, but we're looking for that same ratio [00:03:50] for every dollar invested, the capital investment [00:03:53] would be about $3 on the developer's side, [00:03:58] and we might even possibly look at an RFP process [00:04:01] for those funds, but we're looking at a much larger bucket [00:04:05] to do a little bit more heavy lifting, [00:04:06] and again, we're only looking at the execution [00:04:09] of one or two of those projects throughout that year. [00:04:12] We're also going to be, as has been pointed out, [00:04:19] it's a residential development program, [00:04:20] I think Mr. Wells kind of stated it well today, [00:04:24] and the fact that we need to begin to invest [00:04:26] in the residential properties also, [00:04:28] to begin to build the base in the athelorum, [00:04:30] so that is duly noted, and we'll be moving forward [00:04:35] with that in the fiscal year. [00:04:37] Another major thing that's going to happen [00:04:39] is we'll be updating the CRA plan. [00:04:43] And that will involve the process with, again, [00:04:46] that should be updated every five years, [00:04:47] so this is the fifth year to do that. [00:04:51] Highway 19, we're going to be looking at, [00:04:53] and one of the things that the city manager [00:04:55] directed me to do for that year is to begin [00:04:57] to figure a way of improving the business mix [00:05:00] on Highway 19. [00:05:02] And then, again, we are going to be doing [00:05:04] economic development marketing, and specifically, [00:05:07] what seems to be coming out of strategic plan initiatives [00:05:09] is this marketing packet. [00:05:12] In terms of letting people know what we've done [00:05:16] over the past several years, [00:05:18] and the great opportunities that exist in this city. [00:05:21] Specific to the Marine District, [00:05:23] obviously we're going to be pursuing the SFO and the VA. [00:05:27] And we're also looking at supporting further expansion [00:05:31] of the HCA property. [00:05:33] The VA facility will only be taking up 12 acres [00:05:36] of HCA's 24 acres, and as we already know, [00:05:39] they've already announced expansion of the rehab center. [00:05:43] And this is my own professional opinion, [00:05:44] having been involved in healthcare for many years, [00:05:47] is I generally believe that, as you can see [00:05:50] what's happening in North Bay, [00:05:52] that that property, what I call is a capture zone, [00:05:57] is I feel fairly comfortable over a period [00:06:00] of several years, that will be further developed [00:06:02] because it prevents a great opportunity [00:06:05] for the healthcare sector, [00:06:06] because it is a large assembly of land, [00:06:09] approximately 28 acres with infrastructure. [00:06:13] And I think the city has demonstrated clearly [00:06:15] with its capacity to communicate with HCA [00:06:18] and the community that we provide a great opportunity [00:06:21] for anybody in the healthcare sector [00:06:23] that wants to come to this town. [00:06:25] I think we've demonstrated clearly the capacity [00:06:27] to welcome them and to welcome their capital investments. [00:06:30] And also the Marine District, [00:06:32] I actually call that the employment district. [00:06:35] I think last year I reported to you about a firm [00:06:37] that we worked with that had purchased [00:06:39] the old Applicant Insight building, [00:06:41] and they have purchased that, they have been improving it, [00:06:43] and they've hired over 100 new employees [00:06:46] and are consolidating five other locations to there. [00:06:51] And so that's two large employers that we have down there [00:06:53] if we include Applicant Insight. [00:06:57] The West Main, East Wayne, USI 19, [00:07:00] the goal is to look at that whole connectivity [00:07:02] as one street. [00:07:05] And one of the things that we have active discussion in on [00:07:07] is what we call the Rivergate Land Development. [00:07:12] And we'll continue to have those discussions. [00:07:14] We are having a discussion with the developer right now [00:07:16] in regard to that. [00:07:17] But again, I think there's a way to go on these projects. [00:07:20] There is some strong interest [00:07:21] in the River Road Church property, [00:07:22] and as indicated before, we're gonna be issuing an RFP [00:07:25] on that. [00:07:27] Main Street Programs. [00:07:29] One of the great things that happened last year [00:07:31] is that we've been actively engaging that organization [00:07:34] and evolving it with the direction of KC and the board. [00:07:39] And again, the goal with the Main Street Program [00:07:41] is to really make that connectivity to drive, [00:07:44] you know, I'm trying to figure a way of taking [00:07:46] the success of the park and driving all those wallets [00:07:49] into the local businesses. [00:07:54] And on the Hacienda, we're gonna be going out [00:07:57] an RFP prior to September 1st. [00:08:01] And one of the nice things about that is that, [00:08:05] you know, as opposed to the prior RFP [00:08:07] that occurred three years ago when I first came here, [00:08:10] quite a bit, we know a lot more about this building. [00:08:14] We know it's in much greater shape. [00:08:17] We have a really great architectural team. [00:08:19] And I think that the carrot we're dangling this time, [00:08:22] if we're successful on these two additional, [00:08:24] is a $2 million investment in this property. [00:08:26] So when we issue that RFP, [00:08:29] I think that, and we're gonna be marketing [00:08:31] that very aggressively because we have [00:08:33] very strong relationships with Stephanie Farrell, [00:08:37] Atelier, UF, Bureau of Historic Resources. [00:08:43] So I'm really excited about issuing this RFP [00:08:45] in the Hacienda because we just know a whole lot more [00:08:49] about this building that we've known before. [00:08:52] And I think that's a tremendous advantage to the city. [00:08:55] And I've always said in the Hacienda RFP originally [00:08:59] that the reason why we wanted to continue to pursue this, [00:09:01] unlike, you know, Elaine talks about the football star [00:09:04] that says, you know, you keep trying, you keep trying, [00:09:07] you keep trying until you win. [00:09:08] And this property is very much like that. [00:09:12] And you pick yourself up, you dust yourself off, [00:09:14] and you pursue forward. [00:09:15] But we now have templates from which to work with. [00:09:18] And I think the original Hacienda development agreement [00:09:20] was a really great opportunity for us to identify [00:09:24] what we want, what we don't want, [00:09:26] and what the language in the development agreement [00:09:28] should consist of. [00:09:29] And I've always felt that, you know, [00:09:31] if we weren't successful on that, [00:09:32] we have that to kind of fall back on. [00:09:34] I've always felt that was very important. [00:09:38] We're, in this budget, we're bringing $100,000 [00:09:41] to do the balcony, the two balconies are there. [00:09:45] We actually have bids on most of the stuff [00:09:46] and all the architectural engineering work is done. [00:09:50] And to do their French door on the Bank Street entrance [00:09:53] and the second floor. [00:09:55] The small matching granite will actually cover [00:09:57] the historic stairway, a structural beam in the dining room [00:10:00] and then exterior repairs such as a patio. [00:10:04] And then the $750,000 special category grant [00:10:08] will be specifically windows and doors. [00:10:10] And again, we have just about all the architectural work [00:10:13] and estimates done on that. [00:10:15] The windows actually came back at $350,000 as fixed windows. [00:10:19] The reason why you had such a high price last time [00:10:23] was because there were flexible windows. [00:10:25] And after talking to some developers, [00:10:27] they say you don't want to do flexible windows [00:10:29] near saltwater because apparently it erodes the windows. [00:10:33] And so that debate will continue. [00:10:38] But I'm real happy with the quotes. [00:10:39] And we've asked them to kind of look forward [00:10:41] in terms of what those prices would be. [00:10:44] Okay, let's kind of get into the numbers here. [00:10:49] On the revenue side, do you want me to take this? [00:10:53] On the revenue side, your county operating millage [00:10:58] will come in at $719,000. [00:11:04] And that's actually going to, inside the CRA, [00:11:06] that's going to represent approximately [00:11:08] about a 9.5% increase over the previous year. [00:11:13] Historic preservation grant revenues, $550,000. [00:11:18] Business incubator rent, $36,000. [00:11:21] And then a transfer from the city fund [00:11:25] estimating a millage rate of 9.15 would be $865,000. [00:11:31] Sale of Orange Lake property would be $300,000. [00:11:35] And we're going to bring over, [00:11:38] we had $450,000 in the grant program last year, [00:11:43] of which we've used $250,000. [00:11:45] But we have so many individuals that have property in town [00:11:49] that we're bringing that in to this year also, [00:11:53] that $200,000, so that we can continue [00:11:55] to work with those individuals. [00:11:58] Some have actually bought the property [00:12:01] and wanted to do a bigger project. [00:12:03] The Village Pub would be a classic example [00:12:05] where Carmen actually bought the building [00:12:06] and wants to do something up front [00:12:08] and is currently navigating the process [00:12:11] of getting that approved. [00:12:13] So total revenue would be $2.6 million. [00:12:17] I'm just going to run right down here [00:12:20] to what we have as the Main Street Director position [00:12:23] at $47,257,000, and that would be the wages [00:12:28] and all associated employee benefits associated with that. [00:12:32] Coming down to line item 31.81, [00:12:36] professional services and planning. [00:12:40] We're estimating approximately $60,000 of that [00:12:44] to be with the update of the CRA plan. [00:12:49] We're going to have to go on RFP [00:12:51] and find an organization that would help us, [00:12:53] obviously because you're going to have [00:12:55] to have a lot of community input. [00:12:57] It's going to be a really good time [00:12:58] to take a look at the CRA plan, [00:13:01] look at where we've been in terms of the evolution [00:13:04] of a demographics, the diversity of the city, [00:13:07] and really gather that input from the public [00:13:09] so we just know a whole lot more [00:13:12] in terms of where we're going. [00:13:15] Professional services, just bear with me [00:13:20] because I'd just like to give you a little bit more detail [00:13:21] in terms of what some of those are. [00:13:24] Those are what we call project-specific tasks. [00:13:28] The reason why I'm asking for that amount of money [00:13:30] is that throughout the course of the year, [00:13:33] here's a classic example where we've had [00:13:36] Danny Gatos kind of present on a concept, [00:13:38] and it might fall back, and I know that we were involved [00:13:43] in a restorative application originally, [00:13:46] and so we might be called upon to commit some funds [00:13:50] to maybe some plan that might be involved there. [00:13:52] So it's going to be a project-by-project basis. [00:13:56] Bert Bender, I want to take to Tallahassee with me [00:13:58] on the special category grants [00:14:00] so that I have some muscle there [00:14:01] when we're presenting before that board. [00:14:05] And I would really like to pursue [00:14:08] some more economic development grants. [00:14:09] I think that there's a lot more opportunity out there [00:14:13] to pursue those dollars, [00:14:15] and this city, after talking to some of the experts, [00:14:18] really kind of qualify for them, [00:14:20] given some of the census tracts we have. [00:14:21] It's been quite interesting and a really great conversation [00:14:24] with an expert that's not too long ago [00:14:26] that says since we have a citywide CRA, [00:14:28] there's some areas that we can explore. [00:14:29] So that's why I'm asking for funding for that. [00:14:32] And we don't know what the VA, [00:14:36] there's going to be an awful lot of work there [00:14:38] in terms of the detailed work, [00:14:40] in terms of submitting for the details. [00:14:43] So we're looking at specific projects [00:14:46] and we'll be assigning those dollars [00:14:47] to those specific projects [00:14:48] as they kind of come forward in time. [00:14:50] Advertising and marketing, account number 3422, [00:14:54] would be $10,000. [00:14:58] And then account number 3423. [00:15:00] 499 Contractual Services. We met with PDC about two months ago, Mr. Cronin, and what [00:15:11] they've done is they've kind of dropped that $10,000 program that we used to have with [00:15:15] them all the time, either get a project and you can sit on the advisory board, and they [00:15:20] informed us that they no longer have that program, that their focus pretty much is countywide. [00:15:26] And however, I do kind of have this so that we get involved with them on a specific project. [00:15:32] I do know that they're bringing their SmartSpark product back to this area, and that would [00:15:37] be an example as to where we would do that again. It provides the opportunity to engage [00:15:41] PDC should a project kind of come in this part of it or this specific area that we would [00:15:47] see beneficial to us. [00:15:49] $10,000 to the business incubator or post office for cleaning and repairs. We're just [00:15:58] always running the stuff into that building. And account number 4951, redevelopment incentives, [00:16:04] $375,000. About $175,000 will be focused on the current business incentive program. We're [00:16:16] looking at exteriors. That's pretty much a part of that carryover. And then about $200,000 [00:16:22] would be in what we call the building expansion and renovation or restoration. And again, [00:16:28] I look forward to working with development on that because I've talked to her about some [00:16:33] of these buildings that really need improvements, and we've engaged those business owners also. [00:16:39] And they have key properties in town. And I think by putting a bigger dollar number [00:16:44] on the plate would get them very interested in making major improvements specifically [00:16:49] to the exterior facade. So that's why we're going after that program. And there's some [00:16:57] other tools that we can use within the CRA statute that also sweeten that part for them [00:17:03] also. Residential incentives, again, this has to do with addressing the building stock. [00:17:11] A classic example is that, I think it was somewhere on Central Avenue, somebody bought [00:17:16] a building there, a duplex, and fixed it up and made it look very nice. And I think they're [00:17:21] planning on renting it out. But it was that upgrade that Mr. Wells was talking about. [00:17:25] And again, I'll be taking direction in terms of how we drive that forward. [00:17:28] Mr. Izzone, if I could just ask a question at this point. In terms of the residential [00:17:33] incentive program, did we have any money left over from last year that people didn't attack [00:17:39] or not attack? [00:17:40] No, we don't. [00:17:42] Okay. So my thought is, and I know that you said before in the dissertation part of your [00:17:49] presentation, that we need to pay attention to the residential. And so I'm thinking that [00:17:56] perhaps we need to boost that. And I'd be curious to know how many people were not able [00:18:05] to, you know, who may have been interested in that incentive that weren't able to because [00:18:10] the money was gone before the year came out, the year was up. [00:18:14] Well, I would agree with that. I think it's important to bring more dollars to the community, [00:18:20] specific economic development dollars. One of the things that I had a very extensive [00:18:25] conversation with Laura Volk on the Volk-Zimmerman study was that you strengthen your urban core, [00:18:31] but the goal is to then have that ripple effect where just outside the urban core, [00:18:35] there is that residential improvement. Yeah, we have rental, we're going to have Main Street [00:18:39] landings coming on board. We're going to have the residence of Orange Lace coming on board. [00:18:42] But it's just very much like me. You know, when I got out of college, I rented a place, [00:18:46] then I bought a place just outside of town or near town and built my, you know, and renovated [00:18:52] an older home because it was more affordable for me. And I think that we're very much like [00:18:56] that in a small town where you grew up there. You want to stay here, and I think we have [00:19:01] several residents that have already expressed that. And again, if we have people that want [00:19:06] to buy these older homes and renovate them significantly, I think that would be a great [00:19:11] program to do. I think one of the things that kind of came on the table last year was with [00:19:17] a well-known developer in the area. They had a whole city block that they were looking [00:19:21] to develop, but the market simply just wasn't there. And, you know, I got in a long conversation [00:19:28] as to how we can incentivize that market to build four or five new homes on a stretch [00:19:32] of a city block. I think it was in the south part of town. So again, that's what we're [00:19:37] pursuing in this program, is to be looking at a lot of this old building stock, and we [00:19:41] will begin reaching out to the people we've built relationships with, developers or, you [00:19:46] know, my door's always open, so I always engage in conversation with them. But I was [00:19:51] aware of one developer, I think, is able to build four or five houses, owns a property, [00:19:56] but the market wasn't there for that developer. And so this would be a great example of where [00:20:01] we can go back to that developer and say, if you put these five homes up, here's the [00:20:05] incentive we're going to offer to do that. [00:20:07] Well, I don't know what my colleagues think, but I think that we should increase that significantly, [00:20:13] and I'd be even inclined to triple it, and know that, you know, if it's used, it's, you [00:20:21] know, it's almost like seed money. It's going to go to a significant impact on the economic [00:20:27] development, so. [00:20:28] Just waiting for him to finish. [00:20:32] $49.99, the charge is $20,000, just a little bit reserved to deal with some things that [00:20:38] are going to crop up. $62.22 is the Hacienda Hotel. We'll be bringing $950,000 to the Hacienda [00:20:47] Hotel. I feel real comfortable about getting the $100,000 grant. Again, given the team [00:20:54] and talent we've assembled there with architects, we're certainly going to put on a hard push [00:20:58] with historic resources to make sure that we get the balance of that. [00:21:04] And then, $25,000 for a business incubator, primarily to upgrade the bathrooms. This actually [00:21:11] was in our rental agreement with the tenant. And again, I think that the front and the [00:21:17] side, a lot needs to happen there with the look and appeal of the incubator. It's evolving [00:21:22] into a really strong property. It's a great focal point. It's great to have the Main Street [00:21:26] office there. A lot of things happening in that facility, and hopefully a lot of good [00:21:32] things to come. So we want to keep some dollars allocated to that. We've kind of turned it [00:21:36] around where now it's beginning to pay for itself, which is kind of a good thing. [00:21:48] Any questions? [00:21:49] I do, Mr. Mayor, whenever you want to get to me. [00:21:52] Yeah, go right ahead. I'm probably going to back you up on the one that I'm guessing you're [00:21:56] Well, there's a few things. This is vanilla. This is very vanilla. This is like riding [00:22:07] in the same lane of traffic. I want to change lanes a little bit. That's the reason I let [00:22:15] you go all the way through your entire thing, so we didn't chop it up. I wanted to get your [00:22:21] whole thoughts out, the whole enchilada, whatever it is. This particular agency has been treated [00:22:34] like a stepchild. It's been used as a debt service tool. It's a whole series of things. [00:22:41] That's the reason that, and I'm sure we'll get the opportunity when you go out to get [00:22:50] that professional group that comes in that can redefine what the CRA is, because we've [00:22:57] spent the last two times redoing the CRA internally, because obviously when we were up to our eyeballs [00:23:07] in money and buying property and everything else, this agency had a lot more dynamics [00:23:14] to it. It goes a lot of different ways. First of all, you spend time on it. The manager [00:23:26] spends time on it as the executive director. They made the manager the executive director [00:23:33] years ago on a structural change. In some ways, some of the time that you're involved [00:23:39] with it and the manager needs to be compensated away from the ad valorem budget. I don't have [00:23:47] a magic number. It just needs, if it doesn't happen this year, it sure in the heck better [00:23:54] happen next year. I guess I'll get on a bigger soapbox and talk about more things, because [00:24:02] previously, as you can see back when it was being hammered, it was taking on about half [00:24:08] of different salaries in there, but the CM and the ED needs to be in there. [00:24:17] The advertising and marketing budget's a joke. It's an absolute joke. $10,000, you can spend [00:24:23] that in two weeks in four different platforms. Nowhere in here does it mention any elements [00:24:33] of the penny for Pasco or leveraging any of that penny for Pasco II that was specifically [00:24:41] designated for economic development. Whether it doesn't show up here or displaces dollars [00:24:47] in your ad valorem budget and puts the money back over here, I don't care how it happens, [00:24:55] but that money's being used by the county. They're actually borrowing against that money. [00:25:02] That's how they created the Melanie Kendrick division, because they didn't want to give [00:25:07] the money directly to PDEC, because over that 10-year time period, it's like $47 million. [00:25:14] We don't have a definition there. This residential incentive redevelopment, I don't mind if people [00:25:25] want to come and ask us for things, but these are developers, and they need to have their [00:25:32] own money into the pot before they're with us. I know there's income criteria and all [00:25:37] those. My thing is to create an additional, not a residential incentive, but I think we [00:25:45] ought to max out our clean up the neighborhood or find a program that allows us to recycle [00:25:55] or to do whatever. Over and above that, if not this year, next year, this budget needs [00:26:02] to include community policing elements. That's part of the reason the CRA was developed, [00:26:10] and that's the reason the city mackdaddied it to 99% of the city's area, so they could [00:26:19] not give all that money to the county and ask the county to give it back. Do I think [00:26:24] that that CRA hurts us on the county level sometimes? Sure, I do. Absolutely. This is [00:26:31] the only way we get these dollars back and we see the impact. I think that this budget [00:26:37] needs to, like I said, if not this year, at least next year, it needs to have some community [00:26:43] policing elements or some other dynamics to it. I would take that $75,000 from the $375,000 [00:26:51] for the redevelopment and disperse it through this budget now. I would like for the CRA, [00:27:03] since it is basically the entire city, and it's not even mentioned in your initiatives, [00:27:11] we talk about Marine District, Main Street, Main Street Programs, Hacienda. We're talking [00:27:17] about anything from a community, from a neighborhood. I've been on that for three or four years. [00:27:26] Then over and above that, this Community Development Authority needs to have some money to find [00:27:32] the right, it's not a program, but it needs to find the right mechanism and the right [00:27:40] funding elements to determine a downtown parking structure. If we don't, then all the stuff [00:27:53] we do here will come to a screeching halt in a short period of time. As I said, those [00:28:01] obviously are my thoughts. This agency needs to put on its big boy pants again, like I've [00:28:16] recommended to other people this year. It's a time to come start asking. We have to make [00:28:21] tough decisions. That's what we're here for, to give direction, not to be fully engaged [00:28:27] on a daily basis on incremental elements. We need to give direction. That's the direction. [00:28:33] We need to springboard this year and then pick up with it coming into the next one. [00:28:39] It's not directed at you, it's just the overall agency needs to have a better beeline focus [00:28:46] than what I see here. [00:28:48] Thank you. I was correct, I was going to wind up tag teaming on you. Parking Garage, we [00:28:55] had a million and a half dollars in the current fiscal year. This time last year, there was [00:29:01] another million and a half showing up. I don't know that it was in the CRA budget, but it [00:29:04] was somewhere in the capital improvement budget. That is going to be absolutely critical. Maybe [00:29:14] we just need to defer until we get to the capital improvement budget. I agree 100%. [00:29:19] We've got to do that, and definitely doing stuff to make the neighborhoods look a little [00:29:25] better would be good. I don't know that we need to arbitrarily pick dollar figures for [00:29:31] the residential grants, but we've got to start addressing that. So you're absolutely right. [00:29:39] Director Davis, anything? [00:29:40] I think you guys pretty much covered it. [00:29:44] Director Starkey? [00:29:45] I agree, we need a parking stretcher for sure. I think everyone's kind of on board with that. [00:29:51] And Councilman Phillips does have a good point. Everyone keeps talking about cleaning up our [00:29:56] neighborhoods, and that's part of this agency's job, right? [00:30:00] do incentives to to get that going and you know in its defense we've been off [00:30:05] off track I think for years and years and years due to you know the economy [00:30:11] and everything that the city's been through but things are looking better [00:30:14] now so let's get it back on track and I agree with what you said. So you've got [00:30:19] comments from all five of us at this point hope that helps. Thank you for your [00:30:28] your presentation your hard work on this. Yes. Anything else we need to come [00:30:32] before the CRA tonight? Hearing nothing I entertain a motion to adjourn.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 4Adjournment