On the agenda

1. 0.aRoll Call▶ 0:00
2. 0.b

   Pledge of Allegiance

   The board recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

   ▶ Jump to 0:37 in the video

   ▸Show transcriptHide transcript

   Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors

   [00:00:37] If we could rise for the Pledge of Allegiance, please. [00:00:38] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for [00:00:39] which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. [00:00:40] I

   This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.

3. 0.cApproval of Minutes: September 21, 2017▶ 1:05
4. 1

   Rezoning Application REZ2017-03 – 5718 Grand Boulevard – Esther's School

   approved

   The LDRB considered rezoning application REZ2017-03 for a 1.5-acre property at the SE corner of Grand Boulevard and Louisiana Avenue from R3 single-family residential to MF30 high-density residential, to allow Esther's School (a private Christian school for special needs students) to seek a special exception for an educational institution. After discussion of traffic, safety, river proximity, and concerns about potential future apartment development, the board voted unanimously to recommend approval to City Council.

   Ord. Ordinance #2018-2123

   • motion:Motion to recommend approval of the rezoning application REZ2017-03 as presented by staff. (passed)5–0

   📍2523 Permit Place, Newport Richey, Florida, 34655📍3121 Cable Drive, Holiday📍5534 Wyoming Avenue📍5718 Grand Boulevard🏢Cody River Park Homeowner's Association🏢Esther's School🏢Great Hearts 49ers🏢Gulf Middle School👤Barbara Wilhite👤Chris👤Dr. Cato👤Heather Fiorentino👤Mr. Maesanas👤Mr. Perlow👤Mr. Smalley👤Mr. Smith👤Terry Jones👤Wanda Duff#Development Review Committee site plan review#Gartner Scholarship#MF30 high-density residential#McKay Scholarship#R3 single-family residential#REZ2017-03#Special exception for educational institution#Step Up for Students

   ▶ Jump to 1:16 in the video

   ▸Show transcriptHide transcript

   Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors

   [00:01:16] Okay. [00:01:17] Our first case today is rezoning application, REZ 2017-03-1518. [00:01:18] I'm going to read the minutes. [00:01:19] Okay. [00:01:20] Okay. [00:01:21] Okay. [00:01:22] Okay. [00:01:23] Okay. [00:01:24] Okay. [00:01:25] Okay. [00:01:26] Okay. [00:01:27] Okay. [00:01:28] Okay. [00:01:29] Okay. [00:01:30] Okay. [00:01:31] Okay. [00:01:32] Okay. [00:01:33] This rezoning request was postponed from the September LDRB meeting at the request of [00:01:52] the applicants. [00:01:56] This is the subject property. [00:01:58] It's one and a half acres located at the southeast corner of Grand Boulevard and Louisiana [00:02:02] Avenue. [00:02:03] The request is for a rezoning from R3 single-family residential to MF30 high-density residential. [00:02:11] The applicant wishes to operate a school on the site, a private Christian school for special [00:02:15] needs students. [00:02:16] In order to do so, they need a special exception for an educational institution, and in order [00:02:21] to request the special exception, they need the zoning of MF30. [00:02:26] The request for the special exception would not be applicable for the current zoning, [00:02:30] which is R3 single-family residential. [00:02:35] This is the subject property, again one and a half acres. [00:02:38] There are three buildings on the property. [00:02:39] There's a church, and currently there are three different congregations that utilize [00:02:43] the church building. [00:02:45] There's the former parsonage, and the applicant proposes to use this building as administrative [00:02:50] offices for its multiple campuses. [00:02:54] It currently operates nine other campuses, and this will be the 10th campus for Esther's [00:02:59] School, and there will be six employees working in this building. [00:03:05] And then to the south is the fellowship hall. [00:03:08] The applicant is proposing to have a maximum of 60 students, somewhere between 45 and 60 [00:03:16] students. [00:03:17] This would be kindergarten through grade 12. [00:03:21] The site is currently under site plan review by the Development Review Committee. [00:03:26] When the site is finally approved, there will be conditions associated with the circulation [00:03:33] on the site, landscaping, parking, and also the applicant has proposed to extend the sidewalk [00:03:40] from the eastern half of the property on the south side of Louisiana over on the western [00:03:46] side to Grand. [00:03:48] So those multiple issues will be addressed with the site plan review. [00:03:55] On the future land use map and the comprehensive plan, the property and most of the block is [00:04:01] designated as high-density residential, and so this request to rezone from the current [00:04:06] R3 single-family residential would be consistent with the future land use map, which indicates [00:04:13] that it is designated high-density residential. [00:04:16] Here you see the R3 single-family residential on the block, and this is the proposal to [00:04:21] the MF30. [00:04:25] As I indicated, the site is currently under review by the Development Review Committee. [00:04:30] The request to MF30 zoning district is required in order to seek the special exception, and [00:04:36] the special exception for educational institution is required to operate the school on the site. [00:04:42] The request meets the concurrency requirements, and it's consistent with the comprehensive [00:04:47] plan. [00:04:48] As I said, the MF30 zoning district is consistent with the high-density residential future land [00:04:52] use category on the future land use map, and the special exception for the educational [00:04:56] institution is permitted in the MF30 zoning district, but not the existing R3 zoning district. [00:05:04] And we're going to ask you to recommend approval to the City Council. [00:05:07] And if you have any questions, please share them. [00:05:11] Any questions of staff? [00:05:12] Anybody have questions? [00:05:15] Chris, I just had one, and I was just looking at the MUNI code, just to look at MF30, just [00:05:22] to make sure. [00:05:23] And I see where it lists public schools, but it doesn't talk about private schools. [00:05:26] It also talks about an institution of an educational nature. [00:05:31] Well, if it does, it's not updated on the MUNI codes. [00:05:38] I guess that was my only concern or question was, it just didn't seem to be... [00:05:42] Public schools may seem to be covered, but private schools did not. [00:05:45] I apologize that I don't have the language in front of me, but there is a use designated [00:05:50] as a special exception for an educational institution, and that's the language that [00:05:54] we're following. [00:05:58] I have a question on traffic. [00:05:59] I see that we're not going to do a traffic study. [00:06:01] Are they going to be using school buses? [00:06:04] Yes, that's a good question. [00:06:06] The applicant has indicated that approximately half of the students, roughly 30 out of 60, [00:06:11] will arrive by way of shuttle bus, and they are proposing to have one or two shuttle buses [00:06:16] arrive on the site. [00:06:17] So, they'll be emptied out on site and not in the street, because we do have Gulf Middle [00:06:21] School just down the street running their buses also. [00:06:24] I hate to see a big traffic jam start at that intersection with buses from both schools [00:06:29] trying to get out at the same time. [00:06:30] The shuttle buses will deposit the students on the site, and the circulation on the site [00:06:36] for the shuttle buses and for the parents dropping off their children will be addressed [00:06:40] with a special exception and the site plan approval. [00:06:45] Any other questions of the staff? [00:06:47] I guess one more is, how long has this company been in business? [00:06:52] That I could not answer. [00:06:53] I'll defer to the applicant. [00:06:57] We'll have them up in a minute to give a presentation. [00:07:00] Any other questions of the staff? [00:07:03] Seeing none, does anybody here that is representing the applicant like to speak in favor? [00:07:09] Please come forward and state your name and address. [00:07:12] Yes, hi, Barbara Wilhite, I'm a land use attorney here in Pasco. [00:07:18] My address is 2523 Permit Place, New Port Richey, Florida, 34655. [00:07:23] I am pleased to represent this applicant today in such a worthy school, a school that will [00:07:28] add to serve our community for highly functional special needs children. [00:07:34] There's not a lot of options for parents a lot of times, so to have this school come [00:07:38] into our community, I couldn't think of a better location for the school. [00:07:42] Redeveloping a site that hasn't been used, and it's actually five blocks from where [00:07:49] I grew up. [00:07:50] I grew up on Wyoming Avenue, and so having the church and the school continue to integrate [00:07:55] with the community is an appropriate compatibility of uses, as well as it meeting the comprehensive [00:08:02] plan, high density residential, it is 1.5 acres, it's going to be used, it's got buildings [00:08:07] on it that are being redeveloped, so I think it's consistent with the comp plan. [00:08:11] My client is here, if you have any questions about the school. [00:08:14] The answer to your question was 14 years. [00:08:18] Thank you. [00:08:19] Thank you. [00:08:20] Anybody have questions? [00:08:24] Anybody else in the audience here to speak in favor? [00:08:27] May I speak? [00:08:31] Yes. [00:08:32] Come up, state your name, address please. [00:08:35] I'm Wanda Duff, and I'm president of the Cody River Park Homeowner's Association, which [00:08:40] is directly across from the church. [00:08:44] It's over 55 community, and the reason we're here, we were, you know, I don't have anything [00:08:52] against having the school, because it's for disability, but if it is rezoned to be, what [00:09:01] is it, MF30 or whatever, does that mean later that they could put residential apartments [00:09:12] in there? [00:09:16] I think that would be a question for staff to answer. [00:09:19] With that MF30 designation, the site could be developed with residential at 30 units [00:09:24] per acre. [00:09:25] That is correct. [00:09:26] That could be developed into residential apartments later, but as of right now, the only property [00:09:35] that's involved is just where the church property is, the one and a half acres. [00:09:41] The property that I showed on the screen, it's just that one and a half acres, which [00:09:47] includes the church to the west and the former parsonage and the fellowship hall to the east. [00:09:54] But if that is torn down, or the school doesn't make it, or whatever, then that one and a [00:10:03] half acres could possibly be turned into residential apartments. [00:10:08] Correct. [00:10:09] Per the future land use map, it can already be developed with 30 units per acre, and with [00:10:13] the zoning designation, that would be consistent with the future land use map. [00:10:19] Because we don't oppose having the school or anything there. [00:10:24] It's just that we don't really, would not really like to have residential apartments [00:10:32] built there in that area, but that's ... [00:10:35] I understand that. [00:10:36] I'm not sure we would have a control over that right now. [00:10:40] Okay. [00:10:41] Is there anybody else in the audience wish to speak in favor? [00:10:48] Anybody that would like to speak against? [00:10:50] Please come forward. [00:10:51] State your name and address, please. [00:10:56] Heather Fiorentino. [00:10:57] I'm neither. [00:10:58] I just want to bring out some facts. [00:11:00] Mr. Smith, your point about the traffic is absolutely on point, because today they may [00:11:05] have a lot of kids that will be taken there. [00:11:07] Those kids are going to grow up in the next six years. [00:11:11] They're going to have additional students. [00:11:12] Trust me, I know. [00:11:15] You need to be looking at that. [00:11:16] That traffic study is something that must be done. [00:11:19] The other thing is, and I know this is not done at this point, but would be the site [00:11:23] plan. [00:11:24] Your proximity to both roads, Grand and Louisiana, is a major issue, having children there and [00:11:30] a special, special needs. [00:11:31] We do need additional schools for special needs. [00:11:34] I don't have a problem with that. [00:11:36] I agree with the lady who just spoke about it being multifamily, and then we could turn [00:11:43] around and have low income when you're trying to build up your river, and the close proximity [00:11:48] to the river is also my other concern, which, again, would go to the site plan. [00:11:53] I just want to bring these points out, because these are very important issues that have [00:11:57] to be done. [00:11:58] We talked about the company having 14 years, but no one said what company is coming in. [00:12:03] That would be a concern to make sure that, even though we've discussed these things, [00:12:08] have they followed through in previous places before we give them over this type of land. [00:12:14] I do believe that has to be done. [00:12:16] I would put in some additional caveats to this, if you can, and it might have to be [00:12:24] done at site plan. [00:12:25] I look to the city attorney for that one. [00:12:28] The traffic study definitely needs to be done, how they're going to ensure the safety of [00:12:32] these children in this high area. [00:12:36] That road may say 30. [00:12:38] I live by that road. [00:12:40] No one drives grand at 30, and Louisiana is crazy. [00:12:46] With all your buses that do go back and forth to a golf middle school is a major issue. [00:12:52] You are very close to the river, so I have some concerns about that, and I also have [00:12:56] very strong concerns of the land, if the school falls, that they just made a good [00:13:01] profit by being able to move forward and selling it for multifamily use. [00:13:08] I don't know if that can be thrown into this by any means. [00:13:11] The other thing that I also would ask is, again, what's the name of the company that's [00:13:18] going in there, so that we have a better idea of the quality of the school. [00:13:21] I'm not saying it's not needed. [00:13:24] Will the church also continue to be a church there, or are they selling the property to [00:13:28] the school? [00:13:31] At that point, it really can be a fold. [00:13:33] I'm sorry, I'm trying to fill this out at the same time. [00:13:37] Those are my questions. [00:13:38] It's Heather Fiorentino, 5534 Wyoming Avenue. [00:13:42] Thank you. [00:13:43] Thank you. [00:13:44] To address some of the issues that were raised, the applicant did provide traffic impacts, [00:13:54] and the impacts for the administrative office, for the school, and for the church were all [00:13:59] less than 50 peak trips, therefore, a traffic study was not required per our regulations. [00:14:07] A site plan is currently under review by the Development Review Committee, and issues of [00:14:12] circulation and impacts to the surrounding property neighbors will be addressed, and [00:14:17] the approval will have certain conditions addressing these issues. [00:14:23] As for the speeds on grand and so forth, I'm not sure how to address that. [00:14:29] I will say that the applicant has indicated that they're going to expand the sidewalk [00:14:35] on the south side of Louisiana on their property to grand, to encourage pedestrian activity [00:14:41] in the area. [00:14:43] As for the name of the entity, the applicant is Great Hearts 49ers, that's the corporation, [00:14:49] and the name of the school is Esther's School, and they currently operate nine school locations [00:14:55] throughout the Tampa Bay and Central Florida area. [00:14:57] So this will be the tenth location of Esther's School. [00:15:00] Currently, they are allowing three congregations to operate out of the church building. [00:15:10] One has a congregation of about 30 to 40 congregants. [00:15:14] The other two have a maximum of about 15 congregants, and they operate during the week. [00:15:19] I have a question, staff. [00:15:23] It seems like a lot of times when we have had a rezoning request come before us, we [00:15:28] already had a site plan. [00:15:30] Is that not necessary, or could that be contingent, approving this upon approval of the site [00:15:38] plan? [00:15:39] They are not required to have a site plan approved prior to the rezoning. [00:15:44] You have seen this before, where applicants did have their site plan approved before going [00:15:49] through the rezoning. [00:15:50] That's not a requirement. [00:15:52] Thank you. [00:15:54] My question, follow-up. [00:15:55] Go ahead. [00:15:56] Briefly, I would say also that it's our understanding from the applicant that students will not [00:16:03] be driving to the site. [00:16:05] One more question, Chris, just to tag along with Dr. Cato. [00:16:10] If we as a group, having heard certain concerns, can we make it a condition that we would want [00:16:17] to have a site plan, even though it's not required? [00:16:22] Is that within our purview? [00:16:25] That would not be permissible for a rezoning request. [00:16:28] Okay. [00:16:30] Are there any regulations on special needs schools on safety? [00:16:33] Because as tragic as it is, we've had, I think, three special students drown in the last year [00:16:39] in Tampa Bay that got away, and we are talking about a river that's literally probably 100 [00:16:44] yards away from the school and a very busy street. [00:16:47] I mean, I'd like to know how that's going to be managed. [00:16:51] For the city regulations, I'm not aware of any regulations of special needs students. [00:16:56] I'm assuming there's certain requirements for the state that they have to follow, and [00:17:00] I don't know if the applicant would have anything else to add to that. [00:17:05] As applicant, would you have anything to add to that? [00:17:08] If you would please state your name and address. [00:17:16] My name is Terry Jones. [00:17:17] I am the district superintendent for Esther School. [00:17:20] I also reside at 3121 Cable Drive in Holiday. [00:17:25] To answer the question on safety, Esther School itself, our primary ratio of staff to student [00:17:33] is 10 students to one staff. [00:17:36] So we have a very good coverage of our children. [00:17:42] Children are never outside of the supervision of a supervisor or class monitor or administration [00:17:50] of the school. [00:17:51] I'll also add that on the east and the south perimeter, there is privacy fence going all [00:18:00] across from the street to the southeast corner, from the southeast corner to the west, to [00:18:06] Grand. [00:18:07] A privacy fence goes all the way through to the fellowship hall, to the west side. [00:18:18] And it is a chain link fence from there all the way to Grand. [00:18:23] So as far as being able to get to the river, they would literally have to go through the [00:18:33] educational area of the campus and then on to Grand and down. [00:18:39] So absolutely not impossible, but highly unlikely. [00:18:45] Also I will point out as well that in the northeast corner, it's the playground area [00:18:54] of the prior church, and we're also proposing that as a playground area for our students [00:19:00] that is completely gated and fenced as well. [00:19:06] And I believe also that the engineering consultant had mentioned at one point something about [00:19:09] the doors would be locked from the inside. [00:19:12] Is that something familiar? [00:19:13] The campus? [00:19:14] Yes. [00:19:15] Question? [00:19:16] I have a question follow up to the state's role. [00:19:24] In the business that you're in, do you have to be approved by a certain section of the [00:19:31] Department of Education in Florida, and are you required to report to them that you're [00:19:39] abiding by certain criteria? [00:19:42] We submit reports to the Department of Education on a yearly basis. [00:19:47] And do they have any jurisdiction over how many students per supervisory people there [00:19:56] are, and do they check your other aspects of your? [00:20:02] They don't. [00:20:03] In the 14 years of ESSER school existence, we have found that the lower ratio of student [00:20:09] to staff works much better for the population that we have. [00:20:13] The type of the curriculum that we use in a mainstream school, a supervisor, i.e. teacher, [00:20:22] could have upwards of 25 students. [00:20:24] We've drastically reduced that simply because of our population. [00:20:28] That's a choice that we made as a school. [00:20:35] Thank you for your answers. [00:20:39] Will you be deriving a portion of your income, or a significant portion of your income from [00:20:44] MedWaiver? [00:20:47] Not a significant, no. [00:20:49] Our main, our three primary sources are McKay Scholarship and Step Up for Students income-based [00:20:58] and Gartner Scholarship. [00:21:01] Very very few. [00:21:02] We probably count on one hand a private pay, and those are our only resource, funding resources. [00:21:14] Thank you. [00:21:15] Thank you. [00:21:16] Could I ask one more question of staff? [00:21:19] Is there a lesser density zoning that this special exception could fall under? [00:21:24] That's a good question. [00:21:25] The answer is no. [00:21:27] This special exception would not be allowed with MF14 or MF10. [00:21:31] They do need to seek the MF30 in order to seek the special exception. [00:21:36] Okay, what's your favor? [00:21:45] Your motion for anything? [00:21:47] Can I speak concerning the traffic down the Grand Bull Park? [00:21:54] We're already in our discussion right now. [00:21:56] You had a chance to do that. [00:22:00] Any discussion amongst the board? [00:22:02] I was feeling when I came in, having been in special education for quite a while in [00:22:09] my life working for both private and public sectors, that I was in favor. [00:22:17] I did wonder about the neighborhood because I could see the neighborhood was in transition. [00:22:23] I could see trucks, their sale signs, and I thought about, you know, how would the people [00:22:29] who live in just single family places feel? [00:22:33] I hadn't considered the water issue, and I do believe the ratio, having known how these [00:22:45] things work, I think the ratio is fine, but it is true. [00:22:49] Sometimes staff just don't do what they're supposed to. [00:22:54] On the other hand, when I looked at the property, I thought it looked good to me, and I do know [00:23:03] that having had to meet the needs of public schools, and particularly children with handicaps [00:23:12] and what the parents go through, I felt that it was something I could approve. [00:23:23] I think this facility would be an excellent asset to our community, and I'm strongly in [00:23:27] favor of it. [00:23:28] Do you want to make a motion? [00:23:29] Anybody making a motion? [00:23:30] I'll move that we accept the proposal as presented from the staff. [00:23:36] I can second it. [00:23:37] We have a motion and a second. [00:23:39] If we could have a roll call vote, please. [00:23:47] All right, yes to the motion. [00:23:54] Mr. Maesanas? [00:23:57] Yes. [00:23:58] Mr. Perlow? [00:24:00] Yes to the motion. [00:24:03] Dr. Cato? [00:24:04] Yes to the motion. [00:24:05] Mr. Smalley? [00:24:06] Yes to the motion. [00:24:07] Thank you. [00:24:08] I think this will come before this council, then, is that correct? [00:24:09] And you have the dates on that? [00:24:10] November 7 and 7. [00:24:11] 21st. [00:24:12] 21st. [00:24:13] We'll go to city council.

   This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.

5. 2

   ↳You arrived here from a search for “Mobile Vending Regulations” — transcript expanded below

   Code Amendment COD2017-07 – Repealing Mobile Vending Regulations

   approved

   The LDRB considered Code Amendment COD2017-07 to repeal mobile vending regulations from the Land Development Code, since mobile vending is a regulatory/police power matter rather than zoning. Staff explained replacement regulations are under development and will be presented to City Council simultaneously with the repeal. The board recommended approval.

   Ord. Ordinance #2017-2127

   • motion:Motion to recommend approval of repealing the mobile vending regulations from the Land Development Code. (passed)

   📍Sims Park👤Chris Barnett👤Erica Lindquist👤Lisa#COD2017-07#Land Development Code#Mobile Vending Regulations#sidewalk vendor ordinance

   ▶ Jump to 24:14 in the video

   ▸Show transcriptHide transcript

   Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors

   [00:24:14] Thank you. [00:24:15] You're welcome. [00:24:16] Our second case today is code amendment COD-2017-07, Repeal and Mobile Vending Regulations. [00:24:17] Applicant in the City of New Port Richey. [00:24:18] Chris Barnett, applicant in the City of New Port Richey. [00:24:19] We'll have the rest of the candidates in a minute. [00:24:20] Again, I'll make a motion. [00:24:21] I'll second the motion. [00:24:22] I'll second the motion. [00:24:23] I'll second the motion. [00:24:24] All right. [00:24:25] As I mentioned, we have a roll call vote. [00:24:26] We have a roll call vote. [00:24:27] We'll have the next case on November 7. [00:24:28] And we have a roll call vote. [00:24:29] We'll have the next case on November 7. [00:24:30] And we'll have the next case on November 7. [00:24:32] The first case on November 7 is 2017-07, Repeal and Mobile Vending Regulations. [00:24:37] Applicant in the City of New Port Richey. [00:24:40] If Chris or Lisa wants to present this. [00:24:43] Actually, you're going to hear from Erica Lindquist on this. [00:24:47] From Erica. [00:24:48] Okay. [00:24:49] So, this is actually just a housekeeping item, which only allowed for most parts, and those [00:25:03] regulations would be, like, recommend that the LBRB approve the repealing of those regulations. [00:25:14] But basically, this is to allow food trucks, then, that were not previously allowed, or [00:25:20] hot dog stands that are on a trailer that were not allowed, things like that. [00:25:24] Is that correct? [00:25:25] Yes. [00:25:26] Okay. [00:25:27] Any questions of staff? [00:25:29] You're just repealing. [00:25:30] There's no replacement document as of yet? [00:25:33] That is correct, I think. [00:25:36] Yes, and the reason for that is this is really not a land development issue, and that's why [00:25:41] we're taking it out of the Land Development Code. [00:25:43] It's really, these are mobile things, mobile vehicles, and so it's really a regulatory [00:25:52] police power type of issue, and it's not really a zoning matter, so that's what this is all [00:25:55] about. [00:25:57] Before this takes effect, we will have the new regulations at the same meeting, so that [00:26:02] when the City Council approves this repeal, they will simultaneously approve the regulations [00:26:06] in the new form and outside of the Land Development Code. [00:26:13] So our position would be just as a recommendation for approval, then? [00:26:17] Yes, just that you're recommending that it be removed from the Land Development Code, [00:26:21] basically. [00:26:22] Just out of curiosity, how's the current hot dog vendor, the vendor there in the parking [00:26:27] lot next to the park, are they governed by this, or I understand their whole relationship [00:26:33] as far as how they're permitted. [00:26:34] It's currently governed by the current ordinance, the sidewalk vendor ordinance, and the replacement [00:26:39] one will cover that type of activity in the future when it's crafted. [00:26:44] It's under development currently. [00:26:46] Any other questions? [00:26:50] Do we have a motion? [00:26:54] I guess I have one question. [00:26:58] Does that allow the food trucks to park close to the city park and run without having to [00:27:04] get a permit, or do they just pull up at lunchtime and be there, or do they have to get a permit [00:27:10] before they can park beside Sims Park or any of the other parks? [00:27:14] Again, it's under development, so we're working through all those issues, but most likely [00:27:18] they'll have to get some type of permit where we'll have some oversight as to where they're [00:27:23] being located, so they just can't go wherever they want, whenever they want. [00:27:26] There will be some stipulations about locations, about not being on certain rights-of-way, [00:27:33] about how they operate in and around our public parks and our public parking lots. [00:27:37] We're trying to cover all those aspects. [00:27:40] Does this also cover the ice cream trucks that go down the street? [00:27:44] It will. [00:27:45] Yes, it will. [00:27:46] That's correct. [00:27:47] I actually haven't heard those in a long time, that's why I was wondering. [00:27:52] I guess I'm still not sure. [00:27:53] Why are we repealing something without a document to look at replacement? [00:27:56] It's kind of like the health care with the country here. [00:27:59] I'm not sure if we want to repeal something before we replace it. [00:28:02] Yeah, the replacement won't be coming before you because, as I said, it's really not a [00:28:06] land development issue. [00:28:07] These are mobile. [00:28:10] Do we have a motion for approval of a recommendation? [00:28:18] I make a motion, we approve. [00:28:21] Thank you. [00:28:22] Do we have a second? [00:28:23] I'll second. [00:28:24] I have a motion and a second. [00:28:26] If we can have a roll call vote, please. [00:28:31] Yes to the motion. [00:28:42] Yes to the motion. [00:28:43] Yes to the motion. [00:28:47] Yes to the motion. [00:28:48] Okay. [00:28:49] Well, I think that's all the cases we have. [00:28:54] Lisa, do you have anything else for us? [00:28:56] I do. [00:28:57] Again, I always want to thank you for your time.

   This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.

6. 3

   Adjourn

   approved

   The board adjourned its meeting after acknowledging that this was Chris Mettler's last meeting with the city, with his final day being the following day. The next meeting was noted as November 16th.

   • motion:Motion to adjourn the meeting. (passed)

   👤Chris Mettler#November 16th meeting

   ▶ Jump to 28:58 in the video

   ▸Show transcriptHide transcript

   Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors

   [00:28:58] We know it's valuable and we appreciate you coming out. [00:29:01] It's always nice to have a quorum so we can actually conduct business. [00:29:05] We look forward to seeing you next at our November 16th meeting. [00:29:10] I also know that you'll join me in saying thank you and farewell to Chris Mettler. [00:29:18] This is his last meeting before you and his last day with the city is tomorrow. [00:29:24] We will desperately miss him and all the work he's provided to you. [00:29:28] Thank you, Chris. [00:29:35] Any other business? [00:29:36] That's it. [00:29:38] Call for an adjournment. [00:29:39] Motion to adjourn. [00:29:40] So moved. [00:29:41] Okay. [00:29:42] All in favor, aye. [00:29:43] Aye. [00:29:44] Thank you.

   This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.