On the agenda

1. 0.aRoll Call▶ 0:00
2. 0.b

   Pledge of Allegiance

   Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

   ▶ Jump to 0:33 in the video

   ▸Show transcriptHide transcript

   Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors

   [00:00:34] pledge, please. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

   This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.

3. 0.cApproval of Minutes: October 20, 2016▶ 0:51
4. 1

   ↳You arrived here from a search for “REZ2016-04” — transcript expanded below

   Land Use Plan Amendment LUP2016-03 & Rezoning Application REZ2016-04 – Morton Plant Hospital Parking Area

   approved

   The Land Development Review Board reviewed Morton Plant Hospital's application to change the future land use designation from low-medium density residential to public/semi-public and rezone from R3 single family to planned development district at 6705 Jackson Street, to allow expansion of the hospital's employee parking lot (10 spaces). Both the land use plan amendment and rezoning were recommended for approval to City Council by unanimous 6-0 votes.

   Ord. Ordinance #2017-2099; Ordinance #2017-2100

   • motion:Recommend approval of Land Use Plan Amendment LUP2016-03 changing the future land use from low-medium density residential to public/semi-public. (passed)6–0
   • motion:Recommend approval of Rezoning Application REZ2016-04 changing zoning from R3 single family to planned development district. (passed)6–0
   • motion:Motion to adjourn. (passed)

   📍6705 Jackson Street📍7948 Floridora Drive, Newport-Ritchie🏢Morton Plant Hospital👤Deborah Bartley👤Dr. Cadle👤Gus👤Mr. Gray👤Mr. Smallwood👤Ms. McDonald👤Ms. Michael👤Ms. Moran#LUP2016-03#Phase 0B#REZ2016-04#Unity of title requirement

   ▶ Jump to 1:21 in the video

   ▸Show transcriptHide transcript

   Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors

   [00:01:21] Okay, what you have before you today is a land use plan amendment and a rezoning [00:01:25] application brought before you by Morton Plant Hospital. The property that we're [00:01:36] looking at is 6705 Jackson Street. [00:01:41] Okay, the property itself is right here, it's in black. And I'm showing you in relation to the red, which is the existing hospital campus here. The black is the subject property at 6705 Jackson Street. [00:02:06] The property, this is looking west to the front of the house, or the property in question. This is looking south from the subject property to the residential uses. This is looking at the property, which is currently a parking lot just north of the subject property. You can kind of see the corner of the house that's on the subject property right now. [00:02:35] Is that the property that goes over to Ohio Avenue? Yeah, this one, the one right here, yes. That one was approved recently. And then this is looking south from the existing property, which is the one that's on Ohio. You can see the subject property right there. [00:03:00] So the existing future land use is low, medium density residential. And what they're looking to change to is the public, semi-public future land use to match the existing hospital campus. [00:03:26] The existing zoning on the property is R3 single family. And they would like to change that, the proposed zoning, to planned development district. And that would also match the existing use of the campus of the hospital. [00:03:49] So the land use plan amendment and rezoning request, they both meet the concurrency requirements, and they're consistent with the comprehensive plan. And much like the Ohio Street property, we would require a unity of title to bring that property into the main campus of the hospital. [00:04:13] Oh, I'm sorry. This is a quasi-judicial hearing. That would be the end of the presentation, if there are any questions. I should say the proposed use would be an expansion of the parking lot. [00:04:39] If you go to the engineering drawings, please. [00:05:09] You got it there, Gus? We're talking about this being the property you're talking about right there. Is that right? It's not indicated. [00:05:25] Yeah, just south of the parking lot on the east side. [00:05:29] So everything else basically around it except the residence to the south is already in parking lot for this hospital. Is that right? [00:05:39] Correct. [00:05:41] If you go to page C3-1, it probably shows up better. The big picture view on the left shows the clouded areas being the subject site. And then on to the right, at the upper right-hand corner, shows how it's going to be laid out on that subject property. And everything to the north and to the west is already that parking lot. [00:06:06] If I go back to C1.2, is phase 0B, has that already been changed and improved? If I look back on C1.2, at the bottom, closer to Indiana, there's a phase that says labeled 0B. Has that already been changed? [00:06:28] No, that's a future phase. [00:06:30] So we'll be going through the same process for that person? [00:06:32] No, that already has zoning, but they just haven't actually done the improvement. [00:06:36] And they'll become a parking lot as well, too? [00:06:38] Correct. [00:06:39] Because of planes? [00:06:40] Mm-hmm. [00:06:48] Do you have anything else? Anybody have any questions of staff? [00:06:52] Has the neighborhood been surveyed? [00:06:56] They've all been notified. [00:06:59] Anybody concerned about it? [00:07:02] We've received no comments, and they will also be notified prior to the council hearing. [00:07:08] Is there anyone here to speak in favor of this? [00:07:12] Could you come forward, please, and state your name, address, and for the record for us, please? [00:07:22] Deborah Bartley, 7948 Floridora Drive, New Port Richey. [00:07:26] I'm the construction manager for the hospital, and I, of course, speak favorably to its approval. [00:07:34] Anyone have any questions? [00:07:36] I only have a question about it. [00:07:37] It says that you're not going to generate more than 50 trips per day, you know, the traffic. [00:07:49] So I'm not understanding why you really need a parking lot, then, if you're not going to have more traffic. [00:07:55] A parking lot is for employees, and we have a problem. [00:07:58] We meet the requirements by code of parking spaces, but if you've gone to our hospital, [00:08:04] you'll notice that it's difficult for the public to find parking, [00:08:09] and there is parking as part of our renovation plan that's already been approved that we're losing spaces. [00:08:16] So this parking is allowing us to shift our employees away to make parking available closer to the hospital for our patients. [00:08:23] If I could clarify that point, the traffic portion under concurrency speaks to whether [00:08:30] or not there's a need for a transportation study to be done in association with the land use and the zoning change. [00:08:36] And in this case, our threshold is whether the proposal creates more than 50 trips per day in the p.m. peak hour. [00:08:45] And in this case, this small lot, it does not create the need for a traffic study. [00:08:51] So that's really what that's speaking to. [00:08:53] Thank you. [00:08:54] It's just 10 parking spaces, it looks like. [00:08:56] That's right. [00:09:01] Okay. [00:09:02] The only other question I'll ask you, this is going to be paved and impervious surface, the majority of it, is that correct? [00:09:13] I'm sure the engineering has been done so there's proper retention. [00:09:17] The calculations and everything have all been done, yes. [00:09:21] Right. [00:09:25] Anybody else have any other questions? [00:09:27] The applicant or the staff? [00:09:29] I guess the change will be less tax revenue for the city, right? [00:09:35] So now it's zoned, there's a building, single family residence on the property, so. [00:09:41] Well, we've had this conversation before when the hospital's been before, [00:09:45] and probably if you looked at it specifically for tax revenue, it probably would be a reduction, [00:09:51] but we think that it's still a needed improvement for the community [00:09:55] and probably will create other tax revenue in the surrounding areas, maybe just on this parcel. [00:10:00] It wasn't part of the other conversation, so I apologize. [00:10:02] Sure. [00:10:07] Well, it definitely would be less because you're not going to tax it, [00:10:11] but I think that the improvements that they've made over there have been very nice [00:10:15] and I think it's suitable for everyone. [00:10:21] You've got to have room for people to park. [00:10:25] Anybody else have any questions of the applicant or the staff? [00:10:29] Okay, what's your pleasure? [00:10:31] I'll make a motion to approve. [00:10:33] Motion's made. [00:10:35] Land use plan and the rezoning application, do those need to be two separate things [00:10:40] or they can be combined? [00:10:43] It looks like it's combined in our package. [00:10:45] They probably should be separate because there's two separate ordinances, [00:10:48] so if you wouldn't mind making separate motions for those. [00:10:53] Land use plan. [00:10:55] I second. [00:10:56] Motion made and seconded to approve the recommendation. [00:11:02] And the roll call, Ms. Moran? [00:11:04] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:06] Ms. Michael? [00:11:07] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:08] Mr. Gray? [00:11:09] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:10] Mr. Smallwood? [00:11:11] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:12] Dr. Cadle? [00:11:13] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:14] And Ms. McDonald? [00:11:15] Yes. [00:11:18] Okay, and I'll make a motion then to approve rezoning application. [00:11:24] I'll second it. [00:11:26] Motion's made and seconded. [00:11:28] And the roll call, Ms. McDonald? [00:11:31] Yes. [00:11:32] Dr. Cadle? [00:11:33] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:34] Mr. Smallwood? [00:11:35] Yes. [00:11:36] Mr. Gray? [00:11:37] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:38] Ms. Michael? [00:11:39] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:40] And Ms. Moran? [00:11:41] Yes, to the motion. [00:11:43] Sounds like it's approved. [00:11:45] Our recommendation to council is to approve it. [00:11:47] Correct. [00:11:48] That's right. [00:11:49] Okay. [00:11:50] Any further business to bring before this all guests group? [00:11:53] There's no official business. [00:11:55] I want to thank you all for attending today. [00:11:57] Appreciate your time. [00:11:59] I wish you all a happy and safe [00:12:01] and hopefully not too much tryptophan in your diet Thanksgiving. [00:12:07] Not happening. [00:12:08] And I wanted to congratulate Ms. Moran [00:12:12] because she was reappointed to the board at the last city council meeting. [00:12:15] Thanks. [00:12:16] With that, we have our next meeting scheduled for Thursday, December 15th. [00:12:26] Thank you. [00:12:28] A long way away. [00:12:30] Thank you. [00:12:32] And have a great Thanksgiving, all you guys. [00:12:34] And thanks for your work. [00:12:37] And with that. [00:12:40] Motion to adjourn. [00:12:41] Second. [00:12:42] Action. [00:12:43] Bye.

   This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.

5. 2

   Adjourn

   Adjournment. Next 2016 meeting date noted as December 15, 2016.

   #Next meeting: December 15, 2016