First public hearing on the FY2016-2017 budget: a tentative 9.15 mill rate (down from 9.25), a $19.7M general fund, and $60.5M across all funds.
6 items on the agenda · 1 decision recorded
On the agenda
- 1Call to Order – Roll Call▶ 0:00
- 2
Pledge of Allegiance
Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of silence for servicemen and women.
▶ Jump to 0:15 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:16] I ask you to all stand [00:00:18] and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance, [00:00:20] followed by a moment of silence in honor of our [00:00:22] servicemen and women at home and abroad. [00:00:24] I pledge allegiance to the [00:00:26] flag of the United States [00:00:28] of America and to the [00:00:30] Republic for which it stands, [00:00:32] one nation, under God, [00:00:34] indivisible, with liberty [00:00:36] and justice for all.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 3
Moment of Silence
Brief moment of silence observed at the special meeting.
▶ Jump to 0:38 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:40] Thank you. You may be [00:00:42] seated.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 4.a
You arrived here from a search for “Debbie Manns” — transcript expanded below
First Public Hearing - FY2016-2017 Operating Budget
discussedStaff presented the proposed FY2016-2017 operating budget at the first public hearing. The tentative millage rate of 9.15 mills (down from 9.25) was discussed along with a balanced general fund of $19,708,885 and total budgeted expenditures across all funds of approximately $60.5 million. Two citizens (Mike Nirenbrock and Mr. Gallagher) commented, suggesting the city invest in a formal cost allocation plan.
- direction:Council held the first public hearing on the FY2016-2017 operating budget and tentative millage rate of 9.15 mills, taking public comment. (none)
6910 Grand BoulevardBurton and AssociatesPasco County Property Appraiser's OfficeTyler TechnologyCrystal PeaceMike NirenbrockMr. GallagherMr. RiveraMs. ManzCost Allocation PlanFRS (Florida Retirement System) ratesFY2016-2017 Operating BudgetFirefighter Pension FundFlorida Statute 200.065Neighborhood Improvement ProjectPolice Pension FundR&R (deferred to next year)Resolution 2016-31Truth in Millage (TRIM) NoticeTyler Technology Project▶ Jump to 0:48 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:48] Business items. We only [00:00:50] have one business item on the agenda. [00:00:52] That is the first public hearing. [00:00:54] Ms. Manz. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, [00:00:56] members of the Council. I'm pleased [00:00:58] to submit to you the 2016-17 [00:01:00] fiscal year budget. [00:01:02] The budget has been developed [00:01:04] to not only meet legal fiscal requirements, [00:01:06] but also to provide [00:01:08] detailed information to stakeholders [00:01:10] and other interested parties [00:01:12] for spending in the new fiscal year [00:01:14] and a five-year plan [00:01:16] for capital expenditures. [00:01:18] The budget is the result of many [00:01:20] months of effort from elected officials [00:01:22] and city staff and provides [00:01:24] a long-term perspective and [00:01:26] commitment to provide the best possible [00:01:28] services to residents [00:01:30] at the lowest cost. [00:01:32] City Council has convened [00:01:34] five public work sessions to [00:01:36] review the proposed budget. [00:01:38] The objectives of this budget [00:01:40] are to [00:01:42] preserve the current level of service [00:01:44] with little or no growth [00:01:46] in revenues while making [00:01:48] progress towards and implementing the city's [00:01:50] long-range plans. [00:01:52] Other significant [00:01:54] assumptions that were taken into consideration [00:01:56] in relationship to the [00:01:58] adoption of this budget is we wanted to be [00:02:00] conservative and realistic, [00:02:02] both in the projection of our revenues [00:02:04] and our expenditures. [00:02:06] We are [00:02:08] reflecting a modest increase [00:02:10] of 1.8 percent [00:02:12] in property tax revenues. [00:02:14] The property tax rate [00:02:16] upon which this budget [00:02:18] was structured is [00:02:20] 9.15 mills, which is [00:02:22] 0.10 [00:02:24] percent mills less than last [00:02:26] year. [00:02:28] We want to maintain a target fund balance [00:02:30] of 15 percent [00:02:32] to preserve our financial integrity. [00:02:34] Wage adjustments [00:02:36] have been budgeted at 1.5 [00:02:38] percent for all union and non-union [00:02:40] employees, and the [00:02:42] staffing levels have been recommended [00:02:44] to increase by five full-time [00:02:46] positions. [00:02:48] The fiscal year 2016-17 [00:02:50] general fund budget [00:02:52] is balanced without the use [00:02:54] of reserve funds. [00:02:56] The total general fund revenue budget [00:02:58] is $19,708,885. [00:03:06] The total budgeted [00:03:08] expenditure for all funds [00:03:10] for fiscal year [00:03:12] 16-17 is approximately [00:03:14] $60,573,000. [00:03:18] The total amount of [00:03:20] major capital expenditures [00:03:22] for fiscal year [00:03:24] 16-17 is [00:03:26] $16,691,040. [00:03:30] As part of our [00:03:32] statutory requirement to you, [00:03:34] I need to read the following [00:03:36] into the record. [00:03:38] Florida Statute [00:03:40] 200.065 [00:03:42] Part 2, Section C-1 [00:03:44] prescribes that City Council [00:03:46] adopt the millage [00:03:48] rate prior to adopting [00:03:50] the 2016-17 [00:03:52] budget. A notification [00:03:54] regarding the public hearing has been [00:03:56] provided to every property owner in the city [00:03:58] by the Pasco County [00:04:00] Appraiser's Office. [00:04:02] This notification [00:04:04] is in the form of [00:04:06] the Truth in Millage Notice [00:04:08] was mailed the week of August [00:04:10] 18, 2016. [00:04:12] Action requested is to [00:04:14] adopt Resolution [00:04:16] 2016-31. [00:04:20] The name of the taxing authority [00:04:22] is the City of New Port Richey. [00:04:24] The tentative millage rate of [00:04:26] 9.15 [00:04:28] mills is 0.37% [00:04:30] less [00:04:32] than the rollback rate [00:04:34] of [00:04:36] 9.18 [00:04:38] mills. Total ad valorem [00:04:40] revenues that will be generated are [00:04:42] estimated to be [00:04:44] $4,430,060 [00:04:46] that is [00:04:48] approximately [00:04:50] $145,895 [00:04:52] more [00:04:54] than what was [00:04:56] generated in ad valorem [00:04:58] fiscal year 2015-16 [00:05:00] due to the increase of property [00:05:02] values. The millage [00:05:04] rate is 9.15 [00:05:06] and is a decrease from the [00:05:08] prior year millage [00:05:10] of 9.25. [00:05:12] Although the statute requires [00:05:14] discussion regarding the [00:05:16] percent increase over the rollback [00:05:18] rate and the specific [00:05:20] purposes for which ad valorem [00:05:22] is being increased, for the [00:05:24] record, in [00:05:26] neither case does that apply [00:05:28] to the City. [00:05:30] At this time, the City's Finance [00:05:32] Director, Crystal Peace, [00:05:34] will make a presentation regarding the [00:05:36] proposed fiscal year [00:05:38] 2016-17 operating budget. [00:05:40] After the close of [00:05:42] the presentation, it is [00:05:44] requested that the Mayor invite public [00:05:46] comment on the millage. [00:05:48] Thank you all for your participation [00:05:50] in the development of this budget. [00:05:54] Good evening. [00:05:56] It is my pleasure to present [00:05:58] to you this evening the proposed budget for the [00:06:00] upcoming 2016-2017 [00:06:02] fiscal year. [00:06:04] As the City Manager has already [00:06:06] mentioned, it's [00:06:08] presented tonight, the presentation [00:06:10] tonight, as a result of the collective efforts [00:06:12] of the City Manager, the Department Heads [00:06:14] and their staff. [00:06:16] Before I get into the [00:06:18] details of the budget, I would like to [00:06:20] give an overview of some changes that have occurred [00:06:22] and will occur in the upcoming [00:06:24] fiscal year, and those changes are compared [00:06:26] to last fiscal year and previous [00:06:28] years. The first [00:06:30] item that I [00:06:32] would like to point out is the change in revenue [00:06:34] that we as a City can control [00:06:36] and how it has [00:06:38] increased gradually [00:06:40] over the fiscal years. [00:06:42] Because of staff's efforts, the [00:06:44] City has seen an increase in development [00:06:46] activity. This is evident by [00:06:48] the increase in building permits [00:06:50] issued in fiscal year 2016 [00:06:52] as opposed to fiscal year 2015. [00:06:54] You'll note that this year, [00:06:56] this fiscal year, we've issued [00:06:58] 1,603 permits. [00:07:00] Last year, it was [00:07:02] 1,515. [00:07:06] This increase [00:07:08] is a result [00:07:10] that is directly correlated [00:07:12] to an increase in building permit [00:07:14] revenue overall of about [00:07:16] $70,000. [00:07:18] The next item is [00:07:20] grant activity. In fiscal year [00:07:22] 2016, we have received [00:07:24] about $300,000 [00:07:26] in grant funding [00:07:28] and we're expecting to receive [00:07:30] $544,650 [00:07:34] in fiscal year 2017. [00:07:36] This amount has increased [00:07:38] from even three years ago, which [00:07:40] indicates that staff continues to [00:07:42] apply for various grants that would [00:07:44] essentially free up local dollars [00:07:46] to be used toward [00:07:48] other expenditures. [00:07:52] The City expects to also see [00:07:54] an increase in charges for services [00:07:56] as well, going from [00:07:58] approximately $743,000 [00:08:00] in fiscal year 2016 [00:08:02] to an expectation [00:08:04] of about [00:08:06] $950,000 in fiscal year [00:08:08] 2017. [00:08:10] In charges for services, [00:08:12] it includes off-duty pay, [00:08:14] street lighting, [00:08:16] services for areas outside of the [00:08:18] City limits, recreation and [00:08:20] aquatics, library, [00:08:22] magistrate, and public records request. [00:08:24] Mayor, may I ask a question [00:08:26] or are we going to wait until the whole? [00:08:28] I just have a quick question. [00:08:30] So on the first portion about the [00:08:32] development activity within the City increases, [00:08:34] are those building permits because [00:08:36] there are people that are doing [00:08:38] things or are we being more [00:08:40] efficient in [00:08:42] getting the permits [00:08:44] processed? [00:08:46] Thank you. [00:08:48] That would be [00:08:50] my response, but yeah, it's a collective effort. [00:08:52] I think a combination of [00:08:54] new business within the City [00:08:56] and the collection efforts and [00:08:58] inspection efforts going out there [00:09:00] and making sure that we're [00:09:02] getting those permits that [00:09:04] are needed to be issued. [00:09:06] From a national perspective, it's better times [00:09:08] so people are spending more money on [00:09:10] things like to improve their property. [00:09:12] Thank you. [00:09:18] Some other positives that I would like to point out [00:09:20] that are included in [00:09:22] the proposed budget. [00:09:24] Overall, the City contributions to [00:09:26] the pension plans will [00:09:28] decrease from prior year. [00:09:30] The percentage of payroll [00:09:32] that the City will have to contribute [00:09:34] has decreased [00:09:36] from 42.1% to 35.9% [00:09:38] for the Police [00:09:40] Pension Fund and [00:09:42] from 26% to 23.1% [00:09:44] for the Firefighter [00:09:46] Pension Fund. [00:09:48] And [00:09:50] finally, for health [00:09:52] insurance costs, as we mentioned [00:09:54] during the work session, [00:09:56] no increase. There will be [00:09:58] no increase in premiums, so that's [00:10:00] definitely [00:10:02] included. [00:10:04] You won't see an increase in next year's budget [00:10:06] related to that. [00:10:08] Some challenges. [00:10:10] FRS rates [00:10:12] have increased from [00:10:14] last year, so we can expect [00:10:16] a 3.58% increase [00:10:18] for regular employees and a 1.59% [00:10:20] increase for senior management. [00:10:22] That would be the City's contribution [00:10:24] toward their retirement plans. [00:10:26] And then finally, [00:10:28] we can expect a 10% increase [00:10:30] in our general liability, property [00:10:32] and flood insurance for next year. [00:10:36] Some additional items to note. [00:10:38] We've included [00:10:40] a contingency [00:10:42] of $200,000 [00:10:44] and that's just built in [00:10:46] to cover unforeseen costs for next [00:10:48] year. The general [00:10:50] fund is balanced without the use of [00:10:52] carryover of prior funds, [00:10:54] which the City Manager has [00:10:56] mentioned in her introduction. [00:10:58] And [00:11:00] finally, some changes from [00:11:02] when the budget was originally [00:11:04] presented during the work session. [00:11:06] Originally, we [00:11:08] reestablished or proposed the [00:11:10] reestablishment of R&R, [00:11:12] but we decided [00:11:14] to defer that until next year. [00:11:16] So we'll revisit that concept [00:11:18] and look into it for [00:11:20] next year's budget. Additionally, [00:11:22] we originally proposed [00:11:24] the purchase of police vehicles, [00:11:26] but we decided that we would [00:11:28] defer that cost as well. [00:11:30] And finally, [00:11:32] the Neighborhood Improvement Project. [00:11:34] We have [00:11:36] included expenditures related [00:11:38] to this project of $130,000 [00:11:40] approximately in [00:11:42] our next year's budget, [00:11:44] and we'll defer the remaining $450,000 [00:11:46] in fiscal year 2018. [00:11:52] So now, the fiscal [00:11:54] overview. [00:11:56] Overall, [00:11:58] the proposed [00:12:00] revenue for the general fund, [00:12:02] we're proposing $19,708,885,000 [00:12:08] compared to [00:12:10] the estimate of [00:12:12] fiscal year 2016, [00:12:14] which is $19,826,470. [00:12:18] So it's pretty [00:12:20] close to [00:12:22] what we're estimating for fiscal [00:12:24] year 2016. [00:12:26] I do want to point out for [00:12:28] property taxes, [00:12:30] that does [00:12:32] include property taxes, and [00:12:34] that comes with a proposed millage [00:12:36] of $9.15. [00:12:44] The next [00:12:46] is [00:12:48] the general fund expenditures, [00:12:50] and this slide provides a breakdown [00:12:52] by city, or excuse me, [00:12:54] by department. [00:12:56] And you'll note that each [00:12:58] department has proposed [00:13:00] a budget that is [00:13:02] less than what was proposed [00:13:04] for fiscal year 2016. [00:13:06] Other than, [00:13:08] with the exception of the technology solutions [00:13:10] department, that one is the only one [00:13:12] that had an increase, or a significant [00:13:14] increase, and that's due to [00:13:16] the Tyler Technology [00:13:18] Project. [00:13:20] Over the years, we've [00:13:22] rolled forward [00:13:24] the encumbered [00:13:26] amount of the contract, [00:13:28] so the amount that's [00:13:30] remaining in that contract is [00:13:34] $367,000, [00:13:36] so that is built [00:13:38] into the budget for next year. [00:13:40] That department [00:13:42] also has, is [00:13:44] proposing an additional employee, or [00:13:46] additional position. [00:13:48] Other than that, [00:13:50] I mean, the majority of the other departments [00:13:52] do propose [00:13:54] a reduction [00:13:56] in expenditures compared to last [00:13:58] year's budget. [00:14:01] So total [00:14:03] department expenditures [00:14:05] equals [00:14:07] $18,595,170, [00:14:13] which overall is a 5% [00:14:15] decrease from last year. [00:14:17] When we include [00:14:19] transfers and reserves, [00:14:21] there's a total [00:14:23] expenditures for the general fund. The total [00:14:25] expenditures are $19,708,885. [00:14:29] Which is a 5%, [00:14:31] overall 5% decrease from last year. [00:14:33] Last year's $20,668,124. [00:14:39] Strictly for the general fund, correct? [00:14:41] Yeah, this is just general fund. [00:14:43] Right. [00:14:45] Next is water [00:14:47] and sewer revenues. [00:14:49] We're proposing [00:14:51] a total of $14,555,730 [00:14:56] of revenue for water [00:14:58] and sewer. [00:15:00] And compared to the estimate for fiscal year 16 at $13,676,914. [00:15:10] So there is an increase built into that, which can be accounted for by the 4% increase in [00:15:25] our utility rates, annual increase. [00:15:31] Expenditures for the water and sewer, total division expenditures total $8,706,270, which [00:15:42] is a 3% decline from last year's amended budget. [00:15:46] When we factor in the transfers and reserves, total expenditures for the water and sewer [00:15:51] fund are $14,555,730, which is an overall 4% decrease from last year's budget. [00:16:07] So that is the city's operating budget, and it does cover the general fund in water and [00:16:16] sewer funds. [00:16:19] And as far as the capital improvement program, the only noted change from what has been presented [00:16:24] in previous work sessions before is the neighborhood improvement project, which was reduced and [00:16:32] staggered over the next two years instead of next fiscal year. [00:16:39] So I can filter questions, I mean, answer any questions you may have. [00:16:44] Any questions before we open the public hearing? [00:16:47] The way you came back from the original budget that was presented to us is basically once [00:16:52] the paving assessment program was not moved forward with those revenue dollars that were [00:16:58] initially factored into the original budget that we looked at, we went back and backed [00:17:03] away from R&R as one factor, the improvement program, and you had a third factor in there. [00:17:15] And then can you highlight for me where the savings are, how we've arrived at a lesser [00:17:26] pension fund payment amount from previous years? [00:17:32] Because in just my overview and looking at things, obviously that's an obligation we [00:17:40] have through our collective bargaining agreement, but you're saying it's gone from a 40 percent [00:17:46] number somewhere in that range down to 30, and then the fire department's down. [00:17:52] What were the factors? [00:17:53] Because I know that last year we had a make-up clause of about $100,000 in that fund. [00:18:01] Is it because it's having better experience or they're not projecting that they're going [00:18:06] to be that type of a shortfall this year? [00:18:10] What were the factors that came into play? [00:18:12] And then obviously with the health insurance not having a hit that we initially thought [00:18:16] was going to be there, those are my collective questions right out of the gate. [00:18:24] As far as the pension funds, every year evaluation is done on the pension plan and an actuary [00:18:33] does provide us with our annual required contribution to the plan. [00:18:37] Along with that, we're given a percentage of the current employees that are included [00:18:44] in that pension plan, a percentage of their payroll that we have to use to fund the pension. [00:18:55] What I presented to you is the decline in the percentage of that payroll each period. [00:19:02] I can get you the total dollar amount associated with that. [00:19:05] I don't have them in front of me, but we do get those figures from the pension plan's [00:19:11] actuary that performs evaluation each year. [00:19:15] That's not really guaranteed for the year. [00:19:18] I mean, you know, it's based on, you know, Wall Street, you know. [00:19:23] Well, we do receive an annual required contribution each year and they give us a percentage. [00:19:30] And we use that percentage of the current employees' payroll to reach that annual required [00:19:36] contribution amount at the end of the year. [00:19:39] If we haven't met it, then that's where a lump sum payment to meet our requirement is [00:19:47] given to the pension plan and that's where that unfunded portion is accounted for. [00:19:54] It's made up at the end of the year. [00:19:56] So in some years, we have had to give a lump sum payment to meet our annual requirement. [00:20:03] Very regularly the last few years because of the economy. [00:20:07] Because of the valuation? [00:20:08] Yeah. [00:20:09] You know, economy drops, stocks drop, bonds drop. [00:20:15] At some point, would you just clarify the balance that is in each one of those funds? [00:20:26] In the documentation I've been looking at, I can't seem to, I don't have the current [00:20:32] present value of the fire and the police and then you mentioned that there's obviously, [00:20:40] there must be a lot more people taking advantage of retiring from FRS and we're having to pay [00:20:45] more to keep up with all those people that are retired that are living longer than we [00:20:49] hope for them to live in their actuarial tables. [00:20:52] And with that, we're having to, you know, I don't mean to be crass, but we seem to be [00:21:00] living a whole lot longer. [00:21:01] We're having a whole lot more fun because I keep looking at Facebook more and more and [00:21:05] it seems like all those older people that got to retire that figured out what Facebook [00:21:08] is all about are giving me every avenue of what they're doing and they're having a heck [00:21:12] of a time. [00:21:13] Heck of a time. [00:21:14] So I just, just from the value perspective because obviously we've got contract negotiations [00:21:22] that are going to be starting up with both of our collective bargaining groups next year [00:21:28] and possibly both of them next year and the year after and all I remember is the last [00:21:34] time we went through that and it took us a while to get closed out on the contract was [00:21:42] how those, how those funds performed and obviously we've got obligations by those agreements. [00:21:52] So understanding what the impact is because those funds and hold come from the general [00:21:58] fund and that's usually dictated by ad valorem so, but that's, I'll, I have a few other comments [00:22:05] and questions and stuff but I'd rather wait until we get further into this. [00:22:09] Deputy Mayor, I'm relieved that you weren't suggesting that we needed to take action to [00:22:14] deal with those people living longer. [00:22:16] I'm getting older every day, Mayor, that's all I can tell you. [00:22:20] I have no questions at this time. [00:22:21] Anything else before we open for public hearing? [00:22:23] No, I'll wait for after public hearing. [00:22:24] Thank you, sir. [00:22:25] At this point it would be appropriate to open this up for public comment. [00:22:29] I am pleased we do have some people in the audience who kept their eyes open through [00:22:33] the whole discussion. [00:22:35] If you would come forward and give us your name and address for the record, please. [00:22:39] Mike Nirenbrock, 6910 Grand Boulevard. [00:22:43] First of all, Mr. Gallagher and I would like to thank the City Manager and the Finance [00:22:46] Director for meeting with us and providing us with some of the budget documents, the [00:22:50] draft budget documents. [00:22:53] I called poor Ms. Feast today to discuss a few things with her. [00:22:58] I know I was extremely nervous 33 out of 34 years on budget night. [00:23:04] First year I was too stupid to know I was supposed to be nervous but. [00:23:08] So you're giving us a hall pass? [00:23:09] Nope. [00:23:10] Did you get it from Gallagher so we could get a hall pass? [00:23:12] No. [00:23:13] And you're due back in ABC tomorrow morning. [00:23:20] First thing I'd like to suggest is that the City Council consider investing in a cost [00:23:29] allocation plan. [00:23:31] You are doing a lot of transfers from fund to fund, from water and sewer to general fund, [00:23:37] to a lot of the other funds. [00:23:40] And without a proper cost allocation plan, you don't know if you're transferring the [00:23:47] correct amounts. [00:23:50] And I can tell you from my own personal experience, it's a real eye opener when you find out what [00:23:54] it really costs for one particular department to provide service to another department. [00:24:03] And one of the points was increased grant opportunities. [00:24:09] Especially if you get involved with any federal grants, you're going to have to have that [00:24:13] cost allocation study done anyway or you'll never get your overhead approved. [00:24:19] So I don't think everything gets more expensive every year. [00:24:24] I don't think it would be that expensive for a city in the number of funds that you have. [00:24:30] And I think it would be a great investment. [00:24:32] It would shut up people like me and Mr. Gallagher as far as whether the allocations are being [00:24:38] done properly. [00:24:39] You have to realize, we really do appreciate the knowledge that you bring to the table. [00:24:47] And over the years, there has been some cost allocations done. [00:24:52] And Mr. Rivera, what's the name of the group that we worked with? [00:24:56] Burton and Associates. [00:24:57] For some reason, I keep wanting to call them Gilmore and Associates, but Burton and Associates. [00:25:01] So you're absolutely correct on the internal charges. [00:25:06] Especially when you consider you have two completely different customer groups between [00:25:10] your water and sewer and your general fund. [00:25:13] And it's very important that everything be above reproach on that. [00:25:19] Can you highlight, just since you're educating us with 30 plus years of experience and stuff, [00:25:27] and I hope you don't mind that I ask. [00:25:29] I just want to, with that, to just kind of educate us just a little bit. [00:25:37] I'm not sure where that came from, but I know you were nervous 33 out of 34, but I don't [00:25:44] know if that put you at 35 or not. [00:25:46] But if you could, because it's important not only for us and our overview, but how you [00:25:55] had to deal with that or what the nets are. [00:25:58] And I don't have you on the clock, too. [00:26:00] The whole idea of the cost allocation plan is to find out, especially for a lot of your [00:26:07] administrative services, how their costs should be allocated across all the duties, all the [00:26:15] different funding sources and all the different funds. [00:26:19] You have how many funds? [00:26:22] No, she doesn't have that many. [00:26:28] I think it's five or six. [00:26:30] Six. [00:26:31] Yeah, I think it's five or six. [00:26:32] Okay. [00:26:33] We used to have cost allocations through the CRA, too. [00:26:36] And the CRA, and that's another. [00:26:37] That was even crazier when that was going on. [00:26:40] We had over 70 funds. [00:26:42] So we had to allocate that out, and we had a lot of federal money, Community Development [00:26:46] Block Grant, and they watched it like a hawk, and they would disallow anything they could [00:26:51] possibly disallow. [00:26:52] So it just gives you, it gets very finite about what it costs for that person to do [00:27:00] their job. [00:27:01] It also gives you a great view of here's this department, and here are the revenues it generates. [00:27:09] And then here's what's left over that has to come from property taxes. [00:27:14] So as property taxes become more and more important, it's nice to know that, yes, this [00:27:21] department costs $6 million, but they generate $3 million in revenue. [00:27:25] So it's a net of $3 million that has to come from some other source. [00:27:30] Thank you. [00:27:32] The other thing is that currently the general fund as presented doesn't have a budgeted [00:27:39] fund balance for next year. [00:27:42] And I think I'm going to have a meeting with Ms. Feist next week, Tuesday, and we're going [00:27:51] to look at some of those things. [00:27:53] And I understand she's being very conservative, and I was always very conservative. [00:27:58] I did the same thing she did the first two years I was at the city as far as fund balance. [00:28:04] But in a budget, in a general fund budget where there's $4 million in property taxes, [00:28:11] if all of a sudden you have $2 million in fund balance carry forward, that makes a heck [00:28:16] of a difference to your budget. [00:28:18] And the reserve that she showed, $200,000, is ridiculously low. [00:28:26] We talked today about what we had to do at the county when we realized that in a hurricane [00:28:32] event, yes, the feds show up, but the fed money doesn't show up for quite some time. [00:28:40] And if you ever got into a really bad event, if we ever really got hit, all your emergency [00:28:46] services are going to be operating around the clock for weeks at a time, and the overtime [00:28:52] is going to skyrocket, and you're going to have all kinds of expenses you don't realize. [00:28:56] Your example would have been the no-name storm. [00:28:58] Well, no, I'm thinking more of a hurricane. [00:29:01] You're thinking about the whole event? [00:29:03] Yeah. [00:29:04] And that's some questions that we had asked during the budget process, because previously [00:29:08] we had statutory for our fund balance, and then there was always a carry forward that [00:29:14] allowed you to look at a host of other items, as well as ad valorem rollbacks and all that. [00:29:24] And I'm sure you're aware of our economics still working off of Excel spreadsheets in [00:29:28] some areas at the moment. [00:29:31] But I can tell you that at the county, when we set a goal as to how many weeks can we [00:29:38] survive with a reserve, and when it was presented to the county commission, they said, how long [00:29:45] can we survive right now? [00:29:46] I said, six days. [00:29:48] And they said, well, that's unacceptable. [00:29:50] So we started over several years to start building a fund balance. [00:29:53] So I think you need to have a much more significant storm reserve. [00:30:00] not just a reserve for contingencies. [00:30:02] We had one of those, and Board of County Commissioners [00:30:05] usually would spend that during the year. [00:30:08] But you need a storm reserve, [00:30:09] and you need to build it up over a few years. [00:30:14] Let me just throw this last thing out. [00:30:17] If it turns out that there's about $2 million [00:30:21] in fund balance, you could put $1 million in reserve, [00:30:27] and you could put $1 million towards property tax reduction. [00:30:32] Now, we used to have a saying, when you're at nine mils, [00:30:35] you're really at 10 mils, [00:30:36] because you really don't have anywhere to go. [00:30:40] And it's, when the budget gets squeezed [00:30:43] from all the different things, [00:30:45] property tax is the only place you have to go. [00:30:47] And if you're at 9.10, or 9.15, or 9.25, [00:30:52] you've got no place to go. [00:30:53] And if there is that possibility, [00:30:58] you still can amend the millage rate [00:31:02] at the second final public hearing, and do that. [00:31:07] So she and I are going to meet [00:31:08] for a couple hours next Tuesday, [00:31:10] and just kind of share some ideas. [00:31:14] And hopefully, they'll give you a chance [00:31:18] to do a little something with reserve, [00:31:19] and maybe with property taxes. [00:31:21] We've had those discussions in previous years. [00:31:26] And rightfully so, from being at nine, [00:31:32] or nine and a half, those didn't work, we tried to do it. [00:31:34] Chopper, you had a question? [00:31:36] No, you answered it, because I wanted to differentiate [00:31:40] between the reserves and the reserve fund. [00:31:45] Well, one is statutory, and that's assigned, [00:31:48] and the other's the unassigned, [00:31:49] which is really what you're talking about, [00:31:51] but what does it carry forward? [00:31:52] Well, I mean, it's just good fiscal policy [00:31:56] to have a reserve, it's your rainy day fund type of thing. [00:31:59] Well, when I came aboard, our required fund [00:32:04] was at 25%, and within a year, maybe a year and a half, [00:32:07] it was all gone, it was back down to 15%. [00:32:10] You know, they just hated to put it [00:32:12] in the general fund. [00:32:13] No, but I mean, you know, when you look back to 2008, [00:32:21] the advantage that the county had was, [00:32:24] in all those years, when the real estate market [00:32:27] was going crazy, the board was actually using that [00:32:30] to reduce the millage rate. [00:32:32] So when everything fell off the cliff, they had room. [00:32:39] Once you get up this high, you have a tough time recovering. [00:32:42] That was actually the same situation for the city, [00:32:45] and the millage rate was significantly lower [00:32:48] than it is today, in 2008. [00:32:52] And it went all the way up to nine and a half [00:32:55] as we struggled, just to make sure we could keep [00:32:57] the doors open and the lights on. [00:32:59] So, points well taken, I appreciate you having [00:33:02] the willingness to meet with Crystal [00:33:03] and share some of your decades of experience. [00:33:06] Hopefully she won't be nervous. [00:33:08] Hopefully, thank you very much. [00:33:10] I would be. [00:33:11] Thank you. [00:33:15] Oh, he just threw you under the Janslik bus, [00:33:21] because he, because John. [00:33:22] I remember that one from you last time. [00:33:24] Well, because, yeah, well, you know, in the 90s, [00:33:27] he was still alive, so we're good, thanks. [00:33:29] John Gallagher, 6712 River Road, New Port Richey, Florida. [00:33:33] Mr. Mayor, members of council, thanks for letting me speak. [00:33:37] You've heard what Mr. Nuremberg has to say, [00:33:43] and I guess he and I have always been the same mindset. [00:33:47] Try to build a good financial house [00:33:52] before you go off spending a lot of money. [00:33:56] I think you know what you need to do as far as reserves. [00:33:58] Mike talked about the hurricane fund. [00:34:01] Well, it wasn't something that we required, [00:34:03] but quite frankly, I named it the hurricane fund [00:34:05] so the Board of County Commissioners [00:34:06] wouldn't go hit it every week. [00:34:08] You know, you mean you're gonna hit the hurricane fund? [00:34:12] Well, what happens if we have a hurricane? [00:34:13] Because at that time, [00:34:14] they used to call it the Bank of Gallagher. [00:34:16] Where does, who gets all the money? [00:34:18] Who pays for the police department? [00:34:21] Who pays for the fire department? [00:34:22] Who pays for all those people that are working all along? [00:34:24] And they're gonna look to the city manager [00:34:27] and say, go find the money, [00:34:29] and she's gotta have a deep pocket there someplace. [00:34:34] I'm not sure any money has been put in this budget [00:34:38] for resurfacing roads. [00:34:40] I saw something in the budget [00:34:42] where there was like 2.2 million unrestricted or something. [00:34:46] That just may be prior year's money. [00:34:48] I'm not sure. [00:34:49] Is that what it is? [00:34:50] That's it, yeah. [00:34:50] Roll forward. [00:34:51] But in kind of, I had heard the city council say, [00:34:54] the system you have doesn't work. [00:34:58] Well, in kind of looking around a little bit, [00:35:00] I think if we all look at ourselves in the mirror, [00:35:02] the reason why it doesn't work is because of us. [00:35:06] Some people, you charge 100% paving assessment. [00:35:10] Some people, depends upon how many people show up, [00:35:13] it's 50%, it's 25%. [00:35:16] From what little I've seen, if I'm wrong, just whack me, [00:35:20] it's all over the lot. [00:35:22] And you need a consistent policy. [00:35:27] Here, I believe, and out in the county, [00:35:32] we had a policy that was pretty tough, [00:35:34] but everybody stuck to it. [00:35:36] Residential roads, 100%. [00:35:39] Collective roads, a third, a third, a third. [00:35:42] Main arteries, however you classify, [00:35:45] Gulf Drive, Main Street, those streets, [00:35:48] you pay that 100% out of your gas tax [00:35:50] or whatever funds that you have. [00:35:53] And you gotta stay together, united. [00:35:56] Nobody wants to go and foreclose on somebody [00:36:01] to collect the lien. [00:36:03] But I think, and all you gotta do is send one out, [00:36:07] and the word will spread throughout the city [00:36:09] that the county, I mean, the city is going to collect that. [00:36:13] Now, I noticed on a program you had before, [00:36:16] on program management, [00:36:20] you had the tax collector putting that on a tax bill. [00:36:25] Maybe you ought to explore, [00:36:27] can you put paving assessments on a tax bill? [00:36:31] I mean, you don't have to have one like 2,000 bucks, [00:36:34] you pay it next month, maybe you can structure something [00:36:36] where it goes on a tax bill over 10 years. [00:36:39] And that way, you're guaranteed your money [00:36:41] without having to use your police powers. [00:36:44] But I don't know if, you got a city attorney there [00:36:47] who looks pretty bright, so he may know the answer. [00:36:51] This'll be a subject that we get that workshop [00:36:54] after the 1st of October and try to hash out [00:36:57] something that's equitable and keeps the roads [00:36:59] in good shape, so. [00:37:02] Well, I mean, my two cents would be used to gas tax [00:37:05] and go out there and take care of the infrastructure. [00:37:09] I also, looking at the budget, had some concerns [00:37:11] about, I'm not sure of all the transfers, [00:37:14] Mike talked about a little bit, [00:37:15] going to the water and sewer fund, [00:37:18] taking money from the water and sewer fund [00:37:20] and put it in the general fund. [00:37:22] Old school, me, I always wrote the bond documents [00:37:25] that didn't allow elected officials to do that [00:37:27] because the utility customers, it's an enterprise fund, [00:37:30] the money's generated, it should stay there. [00:37:34] And I see some more of those transfers in this year's budget [00:37:36] and I see a big one back in 13 or 14. [00:37:40] And then I say, you're gonna do another rate increase. [00:37:42] And then you're increasing the utility rates 4%. [00:37:47] Do you have enough money there where you could say [00:37:49] the utility rates, we're not gonna do the 4% this year? [00:37:54] And the answer shouldn't be, well, if we hadn't transferred [00:37:57] 9 million, we'd have enough money. [00:38:00] But those are just some thoughts. [00:38:03] The city is a great city to live in. [00:38:07] I've lived here my whole life. [00:38:10] And sometimes I think we're reaching [00:38:13] a little too high for the moon [00:38:16] and we forget the infrastructure [00:38:18] and the financial infrastructure [00:38:19] that you need to keep viable. [00:38:22] Because as Mike said, when we'd get to 9 mils, [00:38:25] we'd just tell the board 10 mils. [00:38:27] Because the difference between 9 and 10 mils was peanuts. [00:38:31] I mean, I don't know what the difference is [00:38:32] between your millage you're setting tonight [00:38:35] compared to 10 mils, but I bet you it's not a lot of money. [00:38:38] It's peanuts. [00:38:39] And so, thank you. [00:38:42] Thank you. [00:38:46] I think everybody that's in the audience [00:38:48] has had an opportunity to address council [00:38:51] during the public hearing. [00:38:52] So, that being said, I will close the public hearing [00:38:56] and bring this back to council. [00:39:03] Discussion, comments, anyone? [00:39:06] I can kick off. [00:39:08] I appreciate what the two of you have brought forward. [00:39:12] There has been some of that cost accounting going on [00:39:15] and that's in fact when the water and sewer fund [00:39:20] started paying something into the city [00:39:23] was specifically because it had been under-accounted [00:39:28] in prior years. [00:39:29] And so, we tried to get some of that overhead cost [00:39:34] back to the city properly accounting for it. [00:39:39] We have something, and again, you've heard [00:39:41] in the previous meeting, there were references [00:39:43] and a reference tonight to something called Tyler, [00:39:47] which please tell me, Brian, is going to be [00:39:51] fully operational very early in the new fiscal year? [00:39:56] Yes, we're moving forward, as Crystal alluded to, [00:40:00] with all the different changes going on in finance, [00:40:03] we need to get the financial data in [00:40:06] in order to bring it into the database [00:40:08] to make that cutover. [00:40:09] But we're moving forward and we've moved forward [00:40:12] in the last six months more so than we've done [00:40:16] in quite some time. [00:40:17] That will also make cost allocation between departments [00:40:19] much, much easier because we'll have solid numbers [00:40:22] and not somebody sitting there [00:40:23] trying to play with spreadsheets. [00:40:26] So, it's a big jump. [00:40:30] I personally love the idea of the hurricane fund. [00:40:32] I think that's a great concept and I understand [00:40:34] why you called it what you did. [00:40:37] The storm that we had last year that resulted [00:40:40] in some significant expenditures that we had to do [00:40:44] on paving and the expenses that we encountered [00:40:49] just this past week when Hermaine came by, [00:40:52] I think speaks well to the reason we probably [00:40:55] ought to have something designated as a hurricane fund. [00:40:59] And personally, I'd love to see us do that. [00:41:04] I think that's probably more important [00:41:06] than aggressively dropping the millage [00:41:09] is to start looking at building that sort of reserve [00:41:12] because one of these days, we're going to take a hit. [00:41:15] It's not if, it's simply when. [00:41:18] Mr. Mayor? [00:41:19] Yes, sir. [00:41:19] On that note, Ms. Mance, could we get a tally [00:41:21] of what the incurred expenses were [00:41:24] just with overtime, police, and public works [00:41:27] from this most recent storm we've had? [00:41:30] Yes, sir, Mr. Connolly. [00:41:30] Just so we have something to base it on. [00:41:32] You know, we did have coastal flooding. [00:41:34] Police were out there. [00:41:35] Public works, I saw, working diligently overtime [00:41:38] all three, four days straight. [00:41:40] So, it'll be just a small, you know, [00:41:44] not nearly what we could expect with a direct hit [00:41:47] from a category one, two, or three hurricane, [00:41:49] but give us something to kind of base projections on [00:41:52] for overtime that we incurred, you know, per day. [00:41:56] I could be prepared to pass that along to you [00:41:58] tomorrow on my city manager's report. [00:41:59] Thank you. [00:42:00] That would be super, thank you. [00:42:02] Those were my comments. [00:42:04] Mr. Mayor, I'd be happy to start. [00:42:07] I obviously understand and really appreciate [00:42:12] Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Nuremberg coming to see us [00:42:14] because, obviously, you never know [00:42:17] what you're quite going to get. [00:42:20] But with their experience, and they obviously have looked [00:42:24] at key factors in this budget. [00:42:26] The inter-transfers have always been a source [00:42:31] of multiple conversations. [00:42:34] Part of some of that previous years [00:42:36] was accounting for the Tampa Bay water funds [00:42:42] and also utilizing some of those funds [00:42:47] to pay down existing debt that we had [00:42:50] so that we could free up other revenue lines [00:42:53] because the majority of the general fund [00:42:57] along with the CRA had been turned [00:42:59] into a debt service fund. [00:43:02] I hate to take us through some of these, [00:43:04] but I need to ask about some of these [00:43:06] because, obviously, it refers me back [00:43:11] to the movie, Dave, where he sits there [00:43:13] and he kind of accounts through and gets back. [00:43:15] But the answer to the first question [00:43:17] and one that Mr. Gallagher had brought up [00:43:21] is, obviously, taking a stand [00:43:23] on our pavement program moving forward. [00:43:26] I had an opportunity to speak with the manager yesterday [00:43:29] and, obviously, what happens in Mr. Gallagher [00:43:32] and Mr. Nuremberg knows when you fill the house, [00:43:36] everybody up here gets really antsy [00:43:39] because, for you to get from here to your car, [00:43:42] you have to walk through them [00:43:44] and, if you walk around them, they know where you live, [00:43:48] especially if you don't have the meeting in Dade City [00:43:50] and you live on the west side. [00:43:52] That's what's generated some of that back and forth [00:43:55] and the changes of what the policy were and all that. [00:43:59] Rightfully so, he brings up the point [00:44:01] that you need to identify what is a collector, [00:44:04] what's an arterial, [00:44:05] and then what is actually a residential road. [00:44:08] And either that or what's an alleyway [00:44:12] that, if I put it into a big fund, [00:44:15] I'm paying for somebody else's thing [00:44:16] that I'll never go down the alleyway, [00:44:18] but it's part of the city's spine, let's put it that way. [00:44:25] Over and above that is there are specific changes [00:44:29] that you've made throughout the budget [00:44:32] and, obviously, getting a chance to see it [00:44:35] in its completion here over the last few days, [00:44:38] even though we tried to follow a lot of the process [00:44:42] and looking at trying to establish [00:44:44] an unassigned or undesignated fund. [00:44:48] That's usually what we tried to look at [00:44:50] from rollovers in prior years, so that'll be important. [00:44:55] But there are specific things in different departments [00:44:58] that I have questions about. [00:45:00] about, and if that frees up money to be put to the side to have a philosophical discussion [00:45:08] about and or how we're going to allocate it, this is the only, either here at our work [00:45:15] session or the only two times we get to do it. And I think we've all looked at our meeting [00:45:20] schedule between now and the 29th when we have to make this go real without having a [00:45:27] multitude of budget changes next year, which looks like bait and switch to the public, [00:45:34] which I don't want to go through, and I don't want to go through that exercise in explaining [00:45:39] mid-year on certain items. So if you'll indulge me for a few minutes, there are obviously [00:45:47] specific areas within the budget that I had questions, concerns, and obviously just wanted [00:45:55] to highlight some of our previous conversations. If that's okay, Mr. Mayor, I just, I mean, [00:46:02] we have to get this as correct as we can, and then we get one more chance to put it [00:46:07] for real on the 29th. But obviously on the revenue sides... [00:46:13] Can you tell us the page number as you go through here? [00:46:15] I will absolutely do that, thank you. And that's what I was going to ask from staff [00:46:19] as we go through some things. Obviously as we look in anything that I start with, I start [00:46:24] with the general fund because that's where the revenue comes from. That dictates everything [00:46:30] else. Either you're going to do it or you're not because you don't have the money to do [00:46:33] it. And obviously there was the blighted removal program, which was a program where we were [00:46:41] receiving money back from the county, and I call that the Roman Goli Fund because he [00:46:48] was a gentleman at the county that we always worked with to get those blighted dollars [00:46:53] for homes that we tore down. Is that correct, Mr. Rivera? You're the keeper of the... [00:47:01] Yes. [00:47:01] Can I just go ahead and call on staff? Is that okay? [00:47:04] So basically that revenue stream, or what used to be out there for us to do blighted, [00:47:10] it doesn't end in play. At this point, in this budget setting, it's not in play. [00:47:18] And then obviously I see where our fund allocations are coming back for the police and fire back [00:47:23] from the state. And those are statutorily set, and those are numbers that we've gotten [00:47:28] from state, at least they met earlier this year because it's an election year. Otherwise [00:47:34] they'd still be up there and we'd still be digging through some things. [00:47:39] The other is on the second page, on page nine, where it talks about off-duty pay, which is [00:47:46] also going to be something that's going to play back in when we get into a couple other [00:47:50] departments as well as in the police department. But this off-duty pay, I'm just trying to [00:47:56] make sure that I totally understand it because you can see where the numbers were and what [00:48:00] we're projecting for next year. I mean, we go from an amended budget of 82 to 203,000. [00:48:10] And if we miss that, that's a mid-late year makeup. And that's a big swing with the bat [00:48:15] you're trying to find those. But it's on page nine. Page nine about, it's line item 342-10. [00:48:23] You have different page numbers. Page nine for us is the city manager's. [00:48:29] But if you go by the rev code. Give us the rev code and we're okay. [00:48:33] Bill, that'll be fine. 342-10. [00:48:36] Yeah, so, and obviously I was working off of, I didn't have the yellow book. I'm sorry. [00:48:43] Okay, I just want to make sure. Okay, so I'm just trying to make sure I understand that [00:48:51] line is that the revenue is charged to an outside group, whether it be a fundraiser [00:48:59] or whether it be school overtime or directing traffic or whatever entity. But we built that [00:49:06] from not only historical, but from where we see some of our fundraising events and some [00:49:15] of the off-duty hours. Is that right, Mr. [00:49:17] You're right on target, Councilman. But the reason you're seeing that significant change [00:49:23] in that one is we have a different contract with the hospital now. They are the largest [00:49:31] off-duty employer that we have. [00:49:33] Oh yeah, they have one or two officers. I'm sorry. [00:49:36] Well, it's one officer, but what they've done is they've extended those hours significantly. [00:49:41] They came to us asking us if we could do that. And along with that, and this is what [00:49:47] Crystal has done and we have done, is projected out those revenues based on that contract [00:49:53] and then the other special events that you just alluded to. [00:49:56] Okay. Did you have some dental work or something? [00:50:01] So funny, I've had more people say that. [00:50:03] I'm so sorry. I didn't know if I caused that pain in your mouth already or not, because [00:50:07] I'm only on the one or two, but no. I'm just trying to make sure, because if we don't hit [00:50:14] the revenue projections right, it becomes very tedious. Also, down below on line item [00:50:23] 351-12, which is the red light fines, since we've redone that contract and this is where [00:50:31] we're going to be, and we only extended that for one year. So in essence, I think it would [00:50:39] behoove us to make sure that we're okay in looking at that program early on next year, [00:50:46] because we all have our own places with that particular revenue fund, and all of us have [00:50:54] made our positions well known. But obviously, it is a dollar amount that, if it's not in [00:51:02] this budget, you're going to have to go further than R&R and some of those other things. [00:51:10] If I may, just to let you know, the amount that's budgeted is just for the 10 months [00:51:17] of the fiscal year, so through June 30th, the contract, and it's the expected amount [00:51:22] to receive just through the contract, so it's not the whole fiscal year. [00:51:26] Thank you. I appreciate the clarification, because I was thinking it was going to go [00:51:29] out. We do have a deadline, and then looking at it early on in the year to figure out if [00:51:35] that's a revenue fund, and where the program is just overall, depending on what the impact [00:51:42] was. [00:51:42] And then the last one is on my page 10. It's on the very last page, and I believe it's [00:51:47] the line item that Mr. Nuremberg was talking about, which is 389-90, which shows no balance [00:51:55] for the prior year balance unassigned. Is that what you... Because that's the carryover [00:52:03] money, or money that wasn't spent in this year's budget that we move forward into next. [00:52:10] Is that correct? Is that my understanding? [00:52:12] So this is actually a revenue source account, so we would only have money in there if we [00:52:21] planned on using any prior year fund balance, or fund balance. So because we haven't budgeted [00:52:28] to use any, it's zero there. It doesn't mean that there's no reserve or fund balance to [00:52:34] be rolled forward. It's just that we haven't planned on using any of it. [00:52:38] But you're going to identify... In some way, you're going to identify what that... [00:52:43] What the balance is, so that it could be... That we could talk about, or at least know [00:52:48] about it when we make our final budget approval on the 29th. Is that correct? [00:52:53] Yes, I can have that. [00:52:57] You know, and just... Every year, we move some things in the budget, or we consolidate [00:53:03] some things, and it goes from one to the other. Obviously, we do some... We take two or three [00:53:10] places in the budget to kind of restate what we have in our capital plan, and how it flows [00:53:15] back and forth. As I said, just... And then again, we talked about some of these internal [00:53:25] transfers, and some of the transfers that are coming from the CRA, and we've had those [00:53:30] conversations too. So, I tried to look in this budget, and now I'm going over to the [00:53:39] expenditure side, and I'm starting on the city council side. And I'm trying to make [00:53:44] sure that I can account for the new city attorney's contract throughout the account, because a [00:53:51] majority of their monthly retainer is in the city council budget. Because I think last [00:53:59] week, when we approved it, I thought it was like $15,000 a month. Is that correct? As [00:54:05] their monthly retainer? [00:54:07] Sorry, I don't recall specifically the amount. [00:54:11] But that being the case, we've got costs here, and then previously, we did have cost allocations [00:54:18] to other departments that show up in other places in the budget. I'm just trying to make [00:54:22] sure that my expense side does that. I didn't have any issues with the city manager side. [00:54:30] On the administrative side, with the assistant to the manager coming up, if that's going [00:54:39] to be a full year funding, and if there was any dollars that would be in your carry forward [00:54:47] fund for what that position wasn't filled for this year. So in my mind, there's been [00:54:52] like four or five months that that position was not that, as well as the city clerk and [00:54:59] the city administrative assistant, there's some dollar cost savings that should be in [00:55:07] a fund that kind of looks forward. [00:55:11] Because that's an operating expense, in essence, it's in the general fund balance at year end. [00:55:17] So it didn't roll forward, or it hasn't been budgeted to roll forward to next year, but [00:55:23] it is in its fund balance. [00:55:30] Mike, on technology, which was my page 23, but it comes right after the city clerk. [00:55:43] I just want to be clear that line item 6418, which is software, is the Tyler Technologies. [00:55:51] And that amount that's out there, that $367,200, is the phase three, and there's only three [00:56:03] phases of Tyler, correct? So that software cost, which we've allocated over the last [00:56:10] three years, something will show up, but it won't be to this extreme with a comma and [00:56:18] zeros on both sides going into 1718, is that correct? [00:56:25] That is correct, sir. [00:56:25] This concludes what we've been trying to do over the last three years to update our internal [00:56:32] computer processes throughout the entire city, correct? [00:56:36] Yes, sir. [00:56:36] Every department's been, will be affected by Tyler. I'm just making a general statement. [00:56:42] Yes, sir. [00:56:43] All right. [00:56:43] So long as we're on that page, Mr. Lewis, we can jump in. [00:56:47] The special purpose equipment, the 5600, what specifically is that item 6431? [00:56:56] The special purpose equipment encompasses two different items. There's a voiceover IP system [00:57:00] like the one we just approved for the police department a month ago, and a round of microphones [00:57:07] for this council chamber. [00:57:09] I know they want to hear us better at home. I understand that. [00:57:19] Then obviously on the next one, on the accounting and budgeting, I see a car allowance in there. [00:57:27] I thought my understanding was that fringe wasn't going to carry forward, but maybe I [00:57:32] misunderstood that, that line item. [00:57:37] You're correct about that. [00:57:39] So I just found $3,300. I want that to be noted because I have to be in class tomorrow. [00:57:46] I've already been told by Mr. Nirenbrock I've got AVC tomorrow. [00:57:54] I don't like to pick on anybody, but everybody's going to get in the pool sometime today. [00:57:59] Also, I noticed that in that department, 4011 for traveling in and out, [00:58:06] on training, that we are increasing that for next year to basically doubling it. [00:58:16] Does that include any ... I probably wouldn't be here. It might be somewhere else. [00:58:19] Is there anything in there for ... Mr. Nirenbrock talked about a cost allocation. [00:58:26] I also had a thought that, and I used an analogy with the city manager yesterday in my meeting, [00:58:34] but trying to close out our old books with SkyGuard or whatever it was. [00:58:41] SunGuard. [00:58:42] SunGuard. It wasn't Guard or anything, but with the technology. [00:58:48] To figure out a way to close out those books and not totally rely on that data to populate [00:58:55] our new ... I know we do our best to clean it and to accommodate it. [00:59:04] Account for it and everything else, but I didn't know if there'd be parallel to close [00:59:07] out. [00:59:09] What I'm concerned about is things that may have slipped from year to year to year that [00:59:15] when we go to close to go, that we're going to have an unexpected surprise or a large [00:59:20] balance somewhere. [00:59:22] I didn't know what our internal philosophy was going to be about closing out those books [00:59:28] so that we can assess and attest to everything that was there, and then roll the biggest [00:59:35] best that we can into Tyler without rolling the dice and saying maybe 20% of this information [00:59:42] may be not that good, and then we have to go back and clean. [00:59:46] I'm just trying to understand that because we really have made a huge financial investment [00:59:52] in that to get up to speed because everybody thinks our technology is there because they [00:59:58] can pick up their phone and go through everything. [01:00:00] And we're like, sorry, I have to go back. [01:00:02] So can you kind of walk me a little bit [01:00:05] so that I can understand? [01:00:05] I know that there's been plenty of discussion [01:00:08] on how much information we do want to input into Tyler. [01:00:14] I think at one point we were considering all of it, [01:00:18] then only a couple of years. [01:00:21] In discussion with Tyler Technologies, [01:00:24] what we've decided on as far as the financial information, [01:00:27] we've gone back to fiscal year 13 or 14? [01:00:30] 14. [01:00:30] 14. [01:00:31] So it will provide enough information [01:00:36] in order for us to do our historical analysis [01:00:39] and have that historical data that's still relevant [01:00:41] and important without transferring over [01:00:45] a lot of information that's, for lack of better words, [01:00:49] not good information. [01:00:52] I know that, do you want to speak on anything? [01:00:55] Well, just to follow that, Bill, [01:00:58] that's one of the key elements [01:00:59] that we're currently working on [01:01:00] that needs the due diligence as we transfer [01:01:05] and we move this data into the Tyler Technology software [01:01:08] is that those funds have to be closed out [01:01:11] in a fiscal year order in order for them [01:01:13] to be balanced in the new software before we move forward. [01:01:16] I'm just looking for peace of mind. [01:01:19] I use an old analogy like musical chairs [01:01:21] and all of a sudden the music stops [01:01:23] and there's no place to sit, [01:01:25] but there might be money that needs to be paid [01:01:28] or it hasn't flowed through. [01:01:30] I don't know that that's true. [01:01:32] I'm just concerned about that. [01:01:34] The other is obviously in billing and collection, [01:01:37] which is the next department we show up in this, [01:01:40] I believe, probably has to go into point of sale elements [01:01:45] or whatever, but it's line item 4031 [01:01:49] with the credit card charges. [01:01:52] In previous years it's been around there, [01:01:54] but last year for some reason it was like 15 grand [01:01:56] and now it's going back to 60. [01:01:59] So is that point of sale or is that a charge [01:02:03] because they're using a credit card or what's that? [01:02:06] Is that what that is? [01:02:07] Yes, it is. [01:02:08] And I'm sorry, could you repeat that number? [01:02:09] I'm sorry. [01:02:10] It's 49. [01:02:10] It's in 4931. [01:02:11] 4931, it's for billing and collections. [01:02:14] Gotcha, thank you. [01:02:15] The amount that we have budgeted this fiscal year [01:02:18] or for next fiscal year, I'm sorry, [01:02:20] is consistent with the actual figures in 14, 15, and 16. [01:02:24] So it is more in line with what's actually occurring [01:02:29] instead of what was budgeted last year. [01:02:31] All right, I just, like I said, I just. [01:02:34] I thought, Tyler, that that number would go down. [01:02:37] Yes, and it will. [01:02:39] Once we implement, Tyler, they do have a, [01:02:42] I'm sorry, Brian, I'm speaking for you, [01:02:43] but there is a function in there that will allow us [01:02:47] to work with a merchant service provider [01:02:50] to get that cost down. [01:02:54] And I'm moving to library now [01:02:56] because that's the next one I had in my order. [01:03:06] I'm okay with 99% of this. [01:03:08] My one is on the back, the last page. [01:03:11] It's line item 6612. [01:03:17] When we talk about library materials, [01:03:20] and everything I keep hearing is that we're, [01:03:24] we don't need as much storage, [01:03:27] and we're also looking at game planning [01:03:30] once we find a new home for the fire department, [01:03:35] and then how we might retrofit their old building [01:03:39] or whatever happens. [01:03:41] And there's a lot of things to talk about that [01:03:43] down the road, but the warehousing and the size [01:03:47] and not having enough room and all that, [01:03:49] but that particular line item, [01:03:51] and when I took over the years, [01:03:54] it looks like we've invested close to $260,000, [01:03:59] including this upcoming year, the 82. [01:04:01] So I'm just trying to make sure that, [01:04:06] I know you probably, I know your audience [01:04:10] or your customer base is probably threefold. [01:04:14] It's the ones you want to get in the door, [01:04:15] like when we used to have the library on the hill over here [01:04:18] when I was growing up, and then the ability [01:04:22] to get the millennials in there and stuff, [01:04:27] and then some of us old timers that really need [01:04:29] to have something in our hand that we can flip a page with. [01:04:32] So if you could just give me an idea, [01:04:34] because that's what I'm doing. [01:04:35] Sure, I'd be happy to. [01:04:37] Part of this is when something is missing or not returned, [01:04:43] even though they pay for it, [01:04:45] that money goes back into the general fund [01:04:47] and we don't replace it. [01:04:49] And so some things we need to replace. [01:04:54] Your materials, whether they're books, videos, [01:04:59] CDs, even eBooks, all that has a cost to it. [01:05:04] Your e-materials, you really are only like leasing, [01:05:09] and you have to renew those every year. [01:05:11] So part of that is that cost, [01:05:14] and we're trying to bring the collection back up. [01:05:17] We had taken a hit back in 2008, [01:05:23] when the budget started being cut, [01:05:25] and we haven't been able to even keep up [01:05:27] with keeping our collection up to date. [01:05:30] And we only have a four-year, [01:05:33] we don't have the whole 20-year. [01:05:35] So we're trying to update some of the collection, [01:05:37] weed, or deselect is probably a nice word. [01:05:41] Is it also being driven by part of the additional services [01:05:45] that we're providing over and above [01:05:46] what people would think is a standard [01:05:49] or traditional library, is that part of? [01:05:53] Well, part of it, [01:05:54] but even your regular book materials are costing much more. [01:06:00] And we're checking out over 700,000 items a year, [01:06:05] so that also adds to it. [01:06:07] So there are things that are getting a lot of use, [01:06:09] and you need to replace them. [01:06:10] Okay, well, that was my biggest. [01:06:12] Are you keeping that, [01:06:15] I don't know what the program was, [01:06:17] pick up somebody's tab, we'll call that, [01:06:19] in a bar-related comment. [01:06:22] We'll probably do that again in February. [01:06:25] I mean, I wouldn't, why don't we do that year-round? [01:06:29] Well, we could if you all would like us to do that. [01:06:32] I mean, you know, we've got some nice people out there. [01:06:34] Yeah, yeah. [01:06:36] Yeah, we could do that. [01:06:38] Can you, a librarian, [01:06:38] I'm not sure I'm following what you're talking about. [01:06:40] Well, for Valentine's. [01:06:41] You're picking up a tab, [01:06:42] and all of a sudden we went from a bar tab to kids, [01:06:45] and I was trying to figure out what. [01:06:45] Well, they have an outstanding bill at the library, [01:06:49] and they can't check anything more out. [01:06:50] So they have these tickets that are on a board, [01:06:53] and if you pick up a ticket and pay somebody's tab, [01:06:57] then they can check out books again. [01:06:58] For Valentine's, we made little hearts, [01:07:01] and there was no recognizable name or anything on it. [01:07:06] We used a number, [01:07:08] and if somebody wanted to pay the tab of that child [01:07:10] so they could check out again, [01:07:12] they picked up a heart, and they paid for it. [01:07:16] I just, I think that, you know, with, you know, [01:07:19] you know, I constantly bring. [01:07:21] Why do they have a tab? [01:07:22] I mean, the kid's not returning books in time, [01:07:24] they're losing the books. [01:07:24] Where are these tabs coming from that people are picking up? [01:07:28] Both, they don't return them, [01:07:29] or else they're overly overdue. [01:07:32] Sounds like a sweet program, [01:07:34] but I mean, what are we teaching the kids, you know? [01:07:36] You don't return the books and don't pick up your tab, [01:07:37] you can go back and get another one? [01:07:38] I mean. [01:07:40] Well, they can't, if they've got a tab, [01:07:42] they can't, they can't get any more books. [01:07:44] You have to be a good Samaritan to pick up their tab, [01:07:46] or somebody has to buy it. [01:07:48] I don't mean, there was, [01:07:49] I don't think there was a dozen on the sheet, [01:07:50] on the board when I saw it. [01:07:54] We have quite, you know, we have a few, [01:07:57] but their poverty may be homes. [01:08:00] Their parents really don't care. [01:08:04] Sometimes they've been run from house to house [01:08:07] because of divorce, [01:08:09] and a parent holds materials at the one house hostage. [01:08:14] I mean, we have all sorts of things. [01:08:16] You probably see a lot of different scenarios. [01:08:18] And I thought, because we have eight, [01:08:20] you know, I keep bringing up Alice, [01:08:22] that asset limited income restraint, but employed, [01:08:24] we have a 65% in town. [01:08:26] So, you know, some of these are on that low end [01:08:28] of that Alice report, so. [01:08:31] I've moved to the police department, [01:08:33] because they're next on the, next on Bill's top, [01:08:37] top, top ten or top hit list. [01:08:39] And it just goes back to just some overview items. [01:08:42] Obviously, I recognize that you took the automobiles out. [01:08:45] That was, that jumped out. [01:08:47] But the other is, and it goes back [01:08:49] to the other conversation, Chief, [01:08:51] where we talked about the overtime. [01:08:53] Because, obviously, the line items in previous years, [01:08:59] you know, prior to your oversight of that department, [01:09:04] you know, one year was, and I, [01:09:07] I can only imagine it was probably [01:09:08] because of staffing levels. [01:09:13] But I'm looking at, on police support services, [01:09:18] which I believe would be the second, [01:09:20] the second subcategory in that department. [01:09:27] And it's line item 1411. [01:09:31] Basically, the overtime projected [01:09:34] for next year's about 40, about $40,000. [01:09:38] Plus, in a couple of these, we see [01:09:42] where this employee health insurance stipend [01:09:45] has been relieved, or has gone away. [01:09:50] I see it here, but I also see it on the fire side [01:09:53] where it isn't. [01:09:53] I didn't know if that was a collective bargaining thing [01:09:55] that we still have to pay people [01:09:58] for not being part of our health plan. [01:10:02] It should be eliminated in every department. [01:10:04] We'll be there in a minute. [01:10:05] Okay. [01:10:06] Okay? [01:10:08] But, Chief, so what I'm understanding is, [01:10:11] is that the revenue that's coming in on my revenue side, [01:10:14] a good portion of that, is what's gonna be paying [01:10:16] for this overtime, because that's where it's, [01:10:19] or this, this is strictly for officers on the road? [01:10:21] Yes. [01:10:22] That's for patrol officers, detectives. [01:10:26] It's that kind of overtime. [01:10:28] We have an incident happen at the end of shift, [01:10:31] and people stay over, you know, the case carries them over. [01:10:37] Oh, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. [01:10:39] I was thinking we were in a different category. [01:10:41] This is dispatch. [01:10:42] It's overtime and dispatch. [01:10:44] And that's because of staffing levels? [01:10:46] Yes, I have mandatory staffing levels at two. [01:10:48] Right. [01:10:50] Okay, all right, I just wanted to, okay. [01:10:52] And again, when you go over to community services, [01:10:55] police community services, which is the next department, [01:10:58] again, fairly sizable overtime platform there. [01:11:05] And then, as you mentioned, Crystal, [01:11:09] and I had it highlighted or asterisked, [01:11:13] again, the reduction in the pension plan [01:11:17] from what was in that sub-department last year [01:11:21] of about 290 is down to 202. [01:11:24] So, like I said, I'm just wanting to make sure [01:11:28] that we've got good information on the front end. [01:11:32] And what we, because if we have to make up something [01:11:36] come towards the end of the year, [01:11:39] that's hard to come ask for. [01:11:40] It looks like the estimate for 15-16 is 209.03, [01:11:44] so that 202.650 is right in line. [01:11:47] And the next one has to do with the police patrol, [01:11:51] your next department. [01:11:56] And can you tell me what the employee incentive is again? [01:12:02] I'm missing out on what that is. [01:12:05] It's basically a... [01:12:06] The police incentive 15-21? [01:12:08] Yes, sir. [01:12:09] Is that what you're talking about? [01:12:10] Sorry, no. [01:12:11] Yeah, yeah, 15-11, sorry. [01:12:16] It's basically the Christmas bonus program renamed. [01:12:22] And then in this department is the one [01:12:24] that you're looking to add staff, [01:12:29] the two officers. [01:12:30] Yes. [01:12:31] And you don't have them teed up on day one [01:12:37] to start collecting. [01:12:39] So, and maybe I'm digging too deep in the weeds, [01:12:44] but the other is if I'm looking to free up dollars [01:12:49] across the board for things, [01:12:51] I'm looking at staffing that not full for the entire year [01:12:56] because then that money is gonna get shifted [01:13:00] or maybe it's gonna be around. [01:13:02] I'm looking at what would be amicable to that [01:13:05] is you're gonna have to go through the training program, [01:13:08] all those things, [01:13:09] but that money still sits in that budget. [01:13:11] I don't know if there's a better way to identify it. [01:13:13] But in essence, to me, [01:13:15] if I look at a regular line officer, [01:13:17] it's like 40 grand probation. [01:13:22] That's pay, that's not full bennies and everything. [01:13:27] And in response, Mr. Deputy Mayor, [01:13:30] to the point that you're trying to make, [01:13:32] we do not plan to hire both of those positions [01:13:35] effective October 1st. [01:13:37] They'll both be hired on a delayed basis this year. [01:13:42] If you see fit to approve the expenditure. [01:13:46] I see fit to want to make sure [01:13:48] that we've got the right staffing levels, [01:13:50] especially with what's going on out there. [01:13:55] I'd like that money on my side of the ledger [01:13:57] until it actually becomes, until you fill the spots. [01:14:03] Because I'd like to have, [01:14:05] if that's 60 or 70 or $80,000, [01:14:08] and it goes back into that fund that they're talking about, [01:14:11] or that I can use it to either do a cost allocation study, [01:14:17] or I can do it to use for paving until it's needed. [01:14:21] I'm okay with the staffing elements. [01:14:23] I just don't want the money sitting in that fund. [01:14:26] Do you understand my? [01:14:27] I do. [01:14:28] I think what she's saying is this figure, [01:14:30] the way it's written, [01:14:31] anticipates that these people are being hired [01:14:34] at some point during the year, [01:14:35] not necessarily on October 1st. [01:14:37] Not the way that it's described in the overview. [01:14:43] The overview says two positions, [01:14:45] and if I'm looking at literally, [01:14:47] and I'm not an attorney, [01:14:49] but I might have slept at Holiday Inn last night, [01:14:53] I want to make sure that those dollars, [01:14:56] if I get half of that money early on in the year, [01:14:59] I can use it. [01:15:00] but for other things. [01:15:01] So, I will look into this number, but the intention, [01:15:05] it is only to fund those positions for half a year. [01:15:08] So I'll look into it, but that is definitely the intent. [01:15:11] Since we're on this point, not only the two positions here, [01:15:15] we totally know what they're going to do [01:15:16] if they're a patrolman, that's already been written. [01:15:19] And I think the third person's the records person, [01:15:21] we already know what that's going to be. [01:15:22] But there's two other positions, [01:15:24] and one of them is with IT, [01:15:27] and the other's with the rec center. [01:15:28] And I was talking to Ms. Mance today, [01:15:31] and they don't have drawn up any kind of job description [01:15:35] or anything, but the money's being allotted [01:15:37] to do those positions. [01:15:38] So I'm kind of on your spot here. [01:15:42] I'd like to take that money out of the budget [01:15:44] at this point until we've decided that we've been able [01:15:47] to identify what that person's going to do. [01:15:51] I'm totally for, I talked to Brian back in January, [01:15:55] and cities the size of Dunedin, [01:15:58] cities the size of Safety Harbor, [01:16:00] and we're in the middle between, [01:16:01] both of them have five IT positions. [01:16:05] You know, we have three at this point. [01:16:06] I think it's a dereliction of duty for us [01:16:08] not to put money that we expect to spend in the budget now, [01:16:13] even if it's for a position that doesn't get filled [01:16:15] until later in the year. [01:16:17] It makes no sense to take it out of the budget now [01:16:19] if we know we're going to hire them, [01:16:20] because if we do that now, [01:16:22] we're going to have to do a budget amendment [01:16:23] before we can hire them. [01:16:26] These two positions... [01:16:27] Can Mr. Mayor... [01:16:29] Can I finish? [01:16:30] You sure can, Mr. Councilman. [01:16:31] I just think that, you know, [01:16:33] putting a position in the budget [01:16:36] when we don't even have a description of the job [01:16:38] is neglected on our part. [01:16:42] I don't have any problem with the police [01:16:43] and the records position. [01:16:45] The other two positions, we don't have it even written up. [01:16:47] We don't even know. [01:16:48] Actually, in the rec center, [01:16:50] this man said we're not even sure [01:16:51] what we're going to pay him. [01:16:53] So I would rather them come back to us at that point. [01:16:56] I don't mind, if you're going to hire them later in the year, [01:17:00] putting the closest correct amount. [01:17:04] I just don't want it at 100% from day one, [01:17:08] because to me, that's discretionary dollars down the road. [01:17:12] I think that's a compromise between not at all and total. [01:17:16] Is that correct? [01:17:17] Yeah, we need to have a number in the budget. [01:17:22] This is the whole point of doing a budget. [01:17:25] To ignore the fact that we're planning to hire somebody [01:17:27] partway through the year and just say, [01:17:29] well, we'll run it on the wing is ridiculous. [01:17:33] It needs to be in the budget, [01:17:35] even if we don't have the position completely formalized. [01:17:40] Mr. Mayor, if you'll allow me, [01:17:42] it's not unusual at all [01:17:48] in municipal local government management [01:17:51] to not have a job description [01:17:53] until a position's been created. [01:17:55] But if it's helpful to this group, [01:17:57] we could have job descriptions prepared for you [01:18:00] before your second budget discussion on this matter. [01:18:04] That's fine. [01:18:05] To me, the other thing is that if you're going to have them, [01:18:12] you don't know if we're going to pull them out anyway. [01:18:14] So it's a, and we spend a lot of time [01:18:17] taking things in and out too. [01:18:19] So, Chief, I just want to make sure I understand that, [01:18:23] and I've gone to code enforcement, okay? [01:18:27] We have three code enforcement officers now. [01:18:31] The third one was created with grant funding, [01:18:35] and now the grant funding's gone, [01:18:37] and it's a full-time position [01:18:40] within that department, correct? [01:18:42] Yes. [01:18:43] Which is very similar to when, [01:18:46] in the Bush administration, [01:18:47] where they gave money to local police departments [01:18:51] around the country to hire new officers, [01:18:54] but once the funding went away, [01:18:55] the officers were still there, so. [01:18:58] And I know you continually do your staffing charts [01:19:01] and all that. [01:19:02] I just wanted to make sure that, [01:19:03] in my overview of how this position was created, [01:19:06] and obviously, we've tasked our, [01:19:09] and taken a stronger position when it has come to codes, [01:19:13] and enforcing the codes, [01:19:16] because of people not responding, [01:19:19] and we've actually, with some of the other programs [01:19:21] that we've put in by ordinance, [01:19:25] inspection, rental inspections, [01:19:27] all those that generate funds, [01:19:29] that's another cost allocation issue. [01:19:31] But again, I just wanted to make sure [01:19:33] that I wasn't missing anything in the budget, [01:19:35] that there was still some grant funding out there or not. [01:19:38] That funding for that position has been, [01:19:40] is no longer there. [01:19:42] I think that fully went away. [01:19:44] We actually added a position last year or the year before. [01:19:48] You can tell how far behind the curve I am, sir. [01:19:51] Absolutely. [01:19:52] And then, of course, we have the red light camera [01:19:56] revenue part. [01:20:01] Now I'm headed over to the fire department, [01:20:04] and I really apologize, [01:20:05] but I just think that we need to make sure [01:20:07] that we've got all these things, [01:20:08] and I appreciate you not humoring me, [01:20:13] but part of my role here is to ask these, [01:20:15] and unfortunately, some of them have shifted [01:20:18] during our work sessions. [01:20:21] It's not more like work study, but it was that, so. [01:20:25] On the firefighter side, [01:20:26] I've seen where you've moved management around, [01:20:29] where you've taken your second [01:20:33] and moved him into the supervision side [01:20:35] and all those kind of things. [01:20:37] That's where, over the years, [01:20:40] since my second time up here, [01:20:41] we've continually moved things around, [01:20:43] but I just want to make sure I understand that, [01:20:45] in this case, I'm going to use the gentleman's name, [01:20:49] Mr. Exline's, now in the administrative supervision side, [01:20:53] and that's where a lot of the changes [01:20:54] came on your other departments, correct? [01:20:56] Yes, that's correct. [01:20:58] Made more sense to us, since he is management, [01:21:01] to have him in the fire supervision schedule [01:21:04] as opposed to the firefighting schedule. [01:21:06] Okay, and again, under the supervision, [01:21:10] which is line number 1516, [01:21:16] and it's the same line item number under firefighting, [01:21:23] that's that stipend program, [01:21:25] so in essence, that's $1,850 to go with the $33,000, [01:21:30] along with $54,000, so I've reached the $10,000 mark. [01:21:35] Look at that. [01:21:37] And I can still count, too, so I'm good. [01:21:40] The other, obviously, comes back, [01:21:44] and your overtime wages, does that come back [01:21:48] with having to fill vacations or out sick [01:21:51] and all that on the firefighter side? [01:21:54] It's 40 grand, and we all think that when they're [01:21:57] fully employed, that there wouldn't be a lot of that, [01:22:00] but is that what is driving that? [01:22:04] If we fall below minimum manning of five, [01:22:07] and there are no part-time firefighters [01:22:11] to draw from the pool, then yes, [01:22:12] we have to fill that vacancy with overtime. [01:22:16] And five is a standard. [01:22:17] That's minimum. [01:22:18] Right, I understand. [01:22:19] The standard's seven, but if we fall below five, [01:22:21] Well, that's okay. [01:22:22] You know, I'm okay with minimum. [01:22:25] If somebody gets a 70 on their doctor's exam, [01:22:28] what do they call them? [01:22:29] They call them a doctor, so to me, [01:22:31] that's minimum, but you passed, [01:22:33] so I don't need the extra, [01:22:36] I don't need to be, [01:22:38] unless we have a higher incident rate [01:22:40] and we see in the future that we would need that, [01:22:43] if we, luckily enough, down the road, [01:22:45] can expand the city with annexation and some other things, [01:22:49] that's always a pie-in-the-sky look, [01:22:50] but might drive that, so. [01:22:55] Now I've moved on to the economic development department. [01:22:59] There was a comment made, and in the manager's overview, [01:23:04] about a 1.5% pay increase in this budget [01:23:10] for, I think it was union and non-union, [01:23:14] is that correct, Ms. Manns? [01:23:15] Yeah, with the exception of department heads. [01:23:17] With the exception of department heads, [01:23:19] because I noticed that, in some cases in the budget, [01:23:22] there is increases with department heads and there isn't, [01:23:25] so I'm just wanting to make sure that there's, [01:23:28] you know, because that 2% on those numbers [01:23:30] might take my $10,000 away, [01:23:32] and I want to keep that as long as I, [01:23:34] I want to keep that until I get any further down, so. [01:23:42] So I'm okay with that. [01:23:47] I've moved to the development department, [01:23:50] and my, I just want to reiterate, [01:23:53] I'm looking at line 6,299, [01:23:57] and I see the 250 from last year, [01:24:00] and I see 250 in this year's budget, [01:24:03] and these are basically for, not enhancements, [01:24:06] but I guess functional obsolescence and items, [01:24:14] and we spent the 250 last year, correct? [01:24:16] No, this is for, [01:24:17] this is actually kind of like carryover money, [01:24:19] we didn't spend any money, [01:24:20] this is for city hall renovations. [01:24:22] So that goes to what we talked about with the glass wall [01:24:25] and some of the other things. [01:24:27] Didn't come anywhere with the new roof and the CIP [01:24:31] and some of the things we did on the roofing project [01:24:34] and all that, so that 250 is really a carry forward. [01:24:37] Is that correct? [01:24:39] Because if I look at this outright, [01:24:41] I'm saying they just invested $500,000 [01:24:46] in their physical plant somewhere in this department, [01:24:49] so I'm just, so really it's that 250. [01:24:53] You're adding them together, [01:24:54] we didn't spend the 250 this year. [01:24:56] That's the question. [01:24:57] If I looked at this and didn't have that information, [01:25:00] that's exactly what I would see. [01:25:03] You did spend some of it. [01:25:04] So the third column is the estimate [01:25:07] of what was actually spent in 16, [01:25:10] which would be the 21,482, [01:25:12] and that was mainly for the painting [01:25:14] that's being done currently within the city hall. [01:25:18] The rest of it was carried over to next year, [01:25:20] to fiscal year 17, and then we added 21,000 to it [01:25:27] to for some upgrades on [01:25:33] restrooms at restrooms. [01:25:36] So in essence, only 21,482 of the original 250 [01:25:42] that was budgeted was spent. [01:25:44] So under the amended budget, that ought to be 21,482. [01:25:50] Yes. [01:25:51] Okay. [01:25:52] Yes. [01:25:53] I can just tell you that if I didn't have that, [01:25:56] if I didn't have that information, so, okay. [01:25:59] We stay right on that page? [01:26:00] Sure, yeah. [01:26:01] Okay, so item number 4951, where it says housing incentives. [01:26:06] So is that correlation the same, [01:26:08] that we spent 63,318 out of the 150,000 last year, [01:26:12] but we're just keeping it at 150 this year coming in? [01:26:16] We've actually spent close to 190,000, [01:26:18] but it's over different revenue accounts. [01:26:22] We've had some CDBG, some general fund, and some CRA, [01:26:26] and I don't know that I can tell you [01:26:27] the distinctions between them. [01:26:29] I don't know if you can, Crystal. [01:26:32] So this amount is the portion [01:26:38] that's funded by the general fund. [01:26:42] So when we were talking a few weeks back [01:26:44] about bumping up the housing, [01:26:47] we hadn't really landed on a dollar amount. [01:26:49] We didn't want to get into the weeds at that point. [01:26:51] That is not the total on that. [01:26:52] There's other places in the budget [01:26:54] that are addressing potentially incentives. [01:26:58] So for fiscal year 17, [01:27:00] we have budgeted the 150,000 you see [01:27:03] before you here in this fund, [01:27:05] and then in the CRA fund, or the redevelopment fund, [01:27:09] there are other dollars dedicated to this program. [01:27:14] Mr. Phillips. [01:27:15] No, no, no, please, please jump in. [01:27:18] I just, like I said, I just. [01:27:19] Okay. [01:27:24] Under recreation, I'm hearing one person, [01:27:32] I'm hearing two, I'm hearing one in IT. [01:27:35] The way the verbiage was given to us in our, [01:27:38] it said five employees in the manager's [01:27:41] letter of introduction, but in the different departments [01:27:45] that had the descriptions, so it's one new full-time [01:27:50] employee in the recreation department, is that correct? [01:27:56] Go ahead. [01:27:57] Actually, it's, we had originally put it in [01:27:59] for one full-time employee, and now it's been [01:28:02] converted into two part-time positions. [01:28:05] So it's one FTE. [01:28:06] Which equals one. [01:28:07] One FTE, yes. [01:28:09] Without benefits, though, correct? [01:28:12] So that's really, that's. [01:28:14] A savings. [01:28:16] So there's the benefit side of the equation, okay. [01:28:19] All right, and then I go to the second page [01:28:24] when it talks about building improvements, [01:28:26] and all, I see we have 73,000 for other [01:28:31] than building miscellaneous. [01:28:34] It's line item 6399. [01:28:39] Crystal, you may have to chime in on some of this, [01:28:42] because I didn't get the latest revisions on that, [01:28:44] but part of that would be to put in, [01:28:47] to upgrade the sound system we have at Sims Park [01:28:50] for the movie nights and the other productions [01:28:52] that we do there. [01:28:54] Go ahead. [01:28:55] And I believe the rest of it are, [01:28:57] the majority of it is the fitness equipment [01:28:59] that wasn't purchased. [01:29:02] Right, carried forward. [01:29:02] Carried forward to next year. [01:29:04] All right, because the other things that were [01:29:06] in the amended budget this year, [01:29:09] some were building improvements that weren't CIP, [01:29:14] and then just, obviously, that 24,000, [01:29:18] is that the software, the program we just approved [01:29:22] for your? [01:29:24] Yes. [01:29:25] Yes, it is. [01:29:26] And that's being purchased in this fiscal year. [01:29:28] Correct. [01:29:29] Okay, correct. [01:29:30] Yeah, and you can ask when that's gonna be in place. [01:29:34] No, it wasn't. [01:29:36] Good. [01:29:37] No, you're good. [01:29:39] If we go to the second screen in the park, [01:29:40] that's where the CIP is not in here, right? [01:29:42] Yeah, it's in the CAP program. [01:29:43] Okay. [01:29:44] It's in the CAP program. [01:29:44] CIP. [01:29:47] So long as we're in the creation. [01:29:49] So on number 4961, special event from the 1250 to 10,000, [01:29:56] and then on the second page, 5246, [01:30:00] advertising marketing went from 19 to 30. [01:30:03] So is there a tie-in with those two? [01:30:06] No. [01:30:06] Actually, 4961 Special Events City [01:30:09] hosted that those are events such as Codyman. [01:30:13] And the expense last year for Codyman alone was $7,200. [01:30:17] And what was the other account number? [01:30:19] I'm sorry. [01:30:19] The back side is 5246 Advertising and Marketing [01:30:23] Supplies, 19 to 30. [01:30:29] Yes, 5246. [01:30:34] We did ask for a slight increase in our marketing materials [01:30:37] to look at some other alternatives. [01:30:39] One of the studies that was done was [01:30:41] suggested a billboard on 19. [01:30:43] I don't know if council's interested in doing that. [01:30:45] But there was some different things [01:30:47] like that that we asked for a slight increase in our budget [01:30:50] to be able to do more aggressive marketing. [01:30:53] Right. [01:31:00] My overview, and obviously with public works and water [01:31:04] and sewer and all those kind of things, [01:31:06] obviously quite a bit of the R&R, [01:31:11] because obviously it's an enterprise fund, [01:31:14] not totally determined by ad valorem dollars. [01:31:18] So you could obviously keep in there [01:31:21] your R&R expectations. [01:31:25] We're just going to face a situation [01:31:28] if we don't have a bigger rainy day fund [01:31:30] and have it allocated. [01:31:32] I mean, I know a couple years ago we [01:31:34] had to buy a fire truck on the fly for like $400,000 [01:31:38] with Penny for Pasco money that year, [01:31:41] because the other one was out of service [01:31:43] for so long down in Bradenton. [01:31:46] And we had to pull some of that out of undesignated reserves [01:31:49] and all that. [01:31:50] So some of those dollars have gone away. [01:31:53] In my overview of the water and it ties back [01:31:57] and the public service, I didn't have a lot of items [01:32:01] that I identified in there. [01:32:03] Because at the end of the day, these [01:32:06] are folks that are out in front. [01:32:10] They're obligations that we've made. [01:32:13] I'm sure there's some, again, you've [01:32:17] got the waiver stipend lines in the street way. [01:32:21] So you've got those. [01:32:22] You just need to go in there and clean up, [01:32:24] because you've got that stipend for the health insurance. [01:32:29] If I look, I just flipped in. [01:32:32] It's the street and right-of-way. [01:32:34] Streets and right-of-way. [01:32:37] My page was 88. [01:32:40] But again, there's $1,800 in there for the stipend. [01:32:44] That all was supposed to be taken out. [01:32:50] Not appropriate. [01:32:51] So I didn't find a lot in the water and sewer. [01:32:54] And the other thing is, we've spent money [01:32:59] from our storm water, our street lights, [01:33:03] and all that which we'll talk about. [01:33:05] But on a majority of these, I'm willing to roll the dice [01:33:12] a little bit with you, because you can't tell me [01:33:15] when you're doing your smoke test that [01:33:17] might have an impact that we don't see in this budget now. [01:33:21] And at the end of the day, I've noted [01:33:27] that that department, when we've done capital programs [01:33:30] and done some other things, we've [01:33:32] had money that's been returned back to the city, [01:33:34] because we invested in these departments consistently. [01:33:39] Even in the downturn, we invested [01:33:41] into this department and the water sewer department, [01:33:44] because it was generated. [01:33:47] And really, and anybody can correct me, [01:33:51] but that's really the only way we made it out of 11, 12, [01:33:54] and 13, was because we have an enterprise fund. [01:33:57] Otherwise, we'd be severely upside down because [01:34:01] of our debt at that point. [01:34:04] We've had some turns. [01:34:05] But by investing into those departments [01:34:08] consistently, as well as those things, [01:34:11] I didn't find a lot of things that I could hone in on [01:34:14] or didn't have a better understanding on. [01:34:17] So Mr. Mayor, I think in this part of the budget, I'm good. [01:34:24] You know, you got CIP, and then we got CRE. [01:34:27] So I'm good. [01:34:28] And I appreciate, again, allowing me the opportunity [01:34:31] to do my Bill Phillips for the last hour. [01:34:34] Well, I would. [01:34:35] But at the end of the day, that's what I'm here for. [01:34:38] I appreciate that. [01:34:39] Would like to point out, since you touched on it, [01:34:42] that it was the investment that we've [01:34:45] made in the street right-of-way, and the stormwater [01:34:48] in particular, is the reason that the city of New Port Richey [01:34:51] came out of this last storm event in as good a shape [01:34:55] as it did. [01:34:56] And that, I think, speaks very well of previous city councils [01:35:00] that did the bulletin investment. [01:35:03] They didn't like us. [01:35:03] They didn't like us in 12 when we [01:35:05] had to double the size of it because it hadn't [01:35:07] been increased in 10 years. [01:35:09] But important. [01:35:09] Just the history. [01:35:10] Important that it was done. [01:35:13] I do appreciate it. [01:35:13] Any other comments on this section? [01:35:16] Yeah, I just have a couple. [01:35:17] And thank you, Mr. Phillips, because I [01:35:19] think that you probably spoke for all of us, [01:35:22] ticking one item off at a time. [01:35:24] But I just want to go back to our own city council [01:35:26] budget for a moment. [01:35:28] And just to clarify, I just want to touch base. [01:35:36] So we've got special events in a couple of different places [01:35:40] in the budget. [01:35:42] And in our budget, we have cultural affairs events [01:35:47] at $25,000. [01:35:48] And then we have, let's see. [01:35:55] Special events at $50,000. [01:35:57] And what is it? [01:35:58] Special events right below it. [01:35:59] $30,000? [01:36:01] $50,000. [01:36:01] $50,000, right. [01:36:03] So I understand the cultural affairs events. [01:36:09] That's the cultural affairs department. [01:36:11] And then the special events. [01:36:14] So is this the funds that we disperse [01:36:17] to nonprofits that have come to us that are looking for? [01:36:22] That's correct. [01:36:25] My understanding of that is that we [01:36:28] had that money for the Chascos, and for the Bike Fests, [01:36:34] and some of the others. [01:36:35] And part of that, correct me if I'm wrong, [01:36:38] part of it was to pay for in-kind [01:36:41] that we gave in most cases. [01:36:44] Because we don't usually give outright cash. [01:36:48] That's correct, Mr. Deputy Mayor. [01:36:50] And also, this was in some of the previous years. [01:36:53] It was buried in individual department budgets, [01:36:56] as opposed to being in one place where you could actually [01:36:59] see what it was we were doing. [01:37:01] So do we still have the process in place [01:37:03] where they're coming to us and we're discerning how much? [01:37:08] I mean, in years past, I know that we had a specific dollar [01:37:11] amount, whatever that dollar amount was for Chasco Fiesta, [01:37:15] Bike Fest, Kia Fest, I believe, and Cody River Seafood [01:37:20] Festival. [01:37:21] Is there a process in place? [01:37:22] And if so, is it going through the recreation department, [01:37:26] or is it coming out of the cultural affairs [01:37:28] committee for that? [01:37:31] In respect to line item 4810, which [01:37:36] is the cultural affair events budget, [01:37:40] those events are considered by the cultural affairs [01:37:44] commission. [01:37:45] And the cultural affairs commission in turn [01:37:47] makes a recommendation to you to fund new events. [01:37:52] As it relates to the special events fund, which is 4961, [01:37:59] we have been very inconsistent in recent years in the way [01:38:04] that process and distribution occurs. [01:38:09] Our recommendation to you this year [01:38:13] is that we will bring you one recommendation [01:38:16] for the use of the $50,000 and that you [01:38:19] need to approve its use. [01:38:23] So that will be something that's done. [01:38:24] That's something that we'll be bringing to you in the future. [01:38:27] OK, thank you. [01:38:27] And then again, I don't know. [01:38:30] I want to just throw this out at this time, [01:38:32] because we're talking about the dollar amounts. [01:38:34] But we have events that come out of the cultural affairs. [01:38:38] We have events that come out of nonprofits. [01:38:41] We have events that come out of the library. [01:38:42] We have events that come out of the recreation department. [01:38:45] And they're all quality events. [01:38:46] But we really don't have anything in our budget [01:38:49] for the arts, per se. [01:38:51] And I don't know if changing the title of cultural affairs [01:38:57] to arts and culture would help us generate some [01:39:00] of what we used to do years ago, where we were enabling them [01:39:06] to go in and do purchase awards, where they were actually [01:39:09] purchasing art and that art was being distributed [01:39:12] in the community, as well as just nurturing the arts, [01:39:17] so that we have some street art. [01:39:19] I know there's a lot of cities that do that [01:39:22] and that have that classification that [01:39:27] really defines the arts. [01:39:28] So again, maybe that's a good discussion for a work session. [01:39:32] But I just would like to explore some of that. [01:39:35] Mr. Mayor, in response to Councilwoman Davila-Thomas's [01:39:38] question, she's actually asking two different things, [01:39:43] in my opinion. [01:39:44] The cultural affairs events budget [01:39:48] can be used to support events that are art-related. [01:39:54] The second part of what you're suggesting [01:39:56] is the art fund, which is something [01:39:58] that we learned over the course of the last couple of months [01:40:02] that we need to have an appropriation for based [01:40:06] on public improvement projects that have been implemented. [01:40:11] And Mrs. Feast and I will make sure, [01:40:14] before this budget is presented to you for a second reading, [01:40:19] that we have an account for that, [01:40:22] specifically relating to the Sims Park Improvement Project. [01:40:29] With that being said, obviously it [01:40:34] was brought to us that a previous council, which [01:40:37] we don't spend a lot of time digging [01:40:40] deep about what other councils have done, [01:40:43] because it's the past and it's history, [01:40:45] but there's an ordinance in place of having [01:40:47] to fund that particular account. [01:40:51] On the flip side, with our new attorney, [01:40:54] I think we need to re-look at that. [01:40:56] Because once again, when that council thought [01:40:59] that that was appropriate to do off of programs [01:41:07] we were doing from a percentage basis, [01:41:11] the economy was really good. [01:41:13] And I don't want to be disparaging. [01:41:16] They were also the ones that made some interesting real estate [01:41:20] purchases that we still have. [01:41:24] Well, it's fact. [01:41:25] And it was a different time, and this is a different time. [01:41:29] I think we need to abide by what we have on the books from what's in place. [01:41:35] But I also think we need to take time out and re-look at it [01:41:40] and see if that is appropriate moving forward. [01:41:44] I want to do what we said we would do, because we're obligated. [01:41:47] But I don't want to keep carrying it on, because we [01:41:50] think it's still an obligation. [01:41:52] So that's my suggestion to that. [01:41:54] But if I might clarify, that wasn't even my question or concern. [01:41:58] No, no, no, I understand. [01:41:59] I just piggybacked on what you were asking about. [01:42:02] But I do want to reflect on the fact that the Cultural Affairs Committee [01:42:06] has morphed somehow over the last, I would say, six, seven years. [01:42:12] And I'd like to see us revisit what they were doing 10 years ago when [01:42:17] it was truly involved with arts in the community. [01:42:22] So aside from that particular issue that we [01:42:27] have been challenging or discussing, I think [01:42:32] that it's good that we have that dollar amount in there. [01:42:36] But I don't know that it's being, it seems [01:42:39] like there's some repetition in events. [01:42:42] I'm not sure that Cultural Affairs Events should be the title of that [01:42:49] if we're talking about the Cultural Affairs Committee, [01:42:52] because I think we have limited what they're doing by throwing in the events. [01:42:57] So that's kind of where I'm coming from. [01:43:02] Yeah, I like it just like events. [01:43:04] I am very concerned that in still tight economic times that we could find [01:43:14] ourselves in a position of having to take police officers off the street [01:43:21] in order to put up very expensive and not particularly urgently [01:43:27] needed pieces of public art. [01:43:30] And I'm not for that at all. [01:43:34] As Deputy Mayor Phillips pointed out, the plan [01:43:40] was originally put in place back over a decade ago [01:43:47] when the economic climate was much, much different. [01:43:51] And it might have made sense to spend a small amount of the building [01:43:57] projects we were doing towards public art [01:44:00] and to ask people who were looking to invest in the city to do the same thing. [01:44:08] I don't know that that climate exists today. [01:44:10] And I think we would, if you were to ask for a roll call vote on that [01:44:16] right now, I suspect there would be a majority, if not a unanimous group, [01:44:21] that would just say, no, that ordinance needs to be repealed in toto. [01:44:28] And again, I just want to make sure that we're [01:44:30] talking about apples and oranges right now. [01:44:33] That ordinance is not what I'm talking about with cultural affairs. [01:44:36] And I just want us to revisit, perhaps, what the cultural affairs committee [01:44:42] are tasked with. [01:44:43] Because I think there was a time when they were supporting the arts. [01:44:47] And I'm not suggesting that it's art that is art in the street or whatever. [01:44:54] But they just were a little more rounded with supporting the arts. [01:44:58] You want to look at what their mission is? [01:45:00] and what they're, what they've morphed into [01:45:04] and what we believe the committee should be about. [01:45:08] Well, I'm thinking that, yeah. [01:45:09] Well, I'm thinking that we. [01:45:10] But they're on the board, obviously. [01:45:11] Yeah, because I'm thinking that there's [01:45:13] incredibly wonderful programs and events [01:45:16] that are coming out of the library. [01:45:17] There's wonderful, phenomenal events [01:45:19] that are coming out of the Recreation Department. [01:45:21] We have a Main Street program that does events. [01:45:23] We have other organizations and entities that do events. [01:45:28] So I'm not sure that my understanding [01:45:30] of what the Cultural Affairs Committee was [01:45:34] that we've tasked them, again, with events. [01:45:38] So I'm not sure if that's where that belongs [01:45:40] or in the Recreation Department, [01:45:43] because years ago, it was all of this [01:45:45] was coming through recreation and not, so. [01:45:49] If I might suggest, since we are all missing [01:45:51] one of those public events, artistic type events, [01:45:56] going on right now, because we're sitting up here [01:45:59] on the budget, let's try to stick to the budget [01:46:02] and not get too far afield on stuff [01:46:05] that we really need to workshop and discuss [01:46:08] at some other time. [01:46:09] We're tasked tonight to try to get through this budget. [01:46:12] Councilman Starkey? [01:46:13] I'll hold my question for a later date. [01:46:15] Thank you. [01:46:17] Anything else on the general budget? [01:46:21] Make a motion to accept. [01:46:23] Second. [01:46:24] We actually have, you have two resolutions [01:46:25] that you need to approve. [01:46:26] We have two resolutions. [01:46:27] Do we have to get through the capital expenditure budget [01:46:29] before we do that resolution? [01:46:31] You ought to, as well. [01:46:33] Let's do it. [01:46:34] They're gonna be combined in the resolution. [01:46:36] Let's go through and do the capital expenditure side. [01:46:38] Can we take 10 minutes first? [01:46:39] We can take 10 minutes. [01:46:40] And then we'll be back at eight? [01:46:41] Yep, and then we'll get through capital expenditure [01:46:43] that we need to do, the millage rate first, [01:46:45] and then the budgets. [01:46:49] Can we just put this together? [01:46:52] As soon as Crystal's ready, I think we can go over [01:46:54] the capital expenditure plan. [01:46:57] Ms. Feast? [01:47:02] Capital improvement program that's presented tonight [01:47:06] is unchanged from what has been presented [01:47:08] at previous work sessions, with the exception [01:47:11] of the neighborhood improvement project, [01:47:13] which I mentioned before, where we've just [01:47:16] staggered the project over two years instead of one, [01:47:19] and funding 130,000 of that in next year's budget [01:47:25] and the remaining portion of 450,000 in fiscal year 18. [01:47:29] Other than that, it's unchanged, and so I'll, [01:47:32] if you have any questions based on the previous [01:47:36] work sessions or after your review of the draft [01:47:39] before you, I'm more than welcome to answer. [01:47:41] I will open it up for public comment, [01:47:44] seeing no one come forward. [01:47:47] Bring it back to council. [01:47:50] The only question I had is the money that we have in [01:47:52] for the Great Preserve West Entrance, [01:47:57] that's a grant, that's a matching grant dollar amount, [01:48:04] it's 400 for the work, but 200's coming from one source [01:48:07] and the other two is from, is from Pennyford Pascoe, [01:48:12] is that correct? [01:48:13] Correct, Mr. Deputy Mayor. [01:48:13] All right. [01:48:16] Any other questions? [01:48:17] No, we've, we've. [01:48:19] Just a quick question. [01:48:20] Sure. [01:48:21] Ms. Bees, does this supersede what we already received [01:48:25] or just as a paper copy of what we have? [01:48:28] That is just a paper copy, yes. [01:48:30] Okay, thank you. [01:48:31] Very good, at this point I think it would be appropriate [01:48:33] to ask the city attorney to read the two resolutions. [01:48:37] Yes, Mr. Mayor, you have two resolutions. [01:48:39] They require a separate vote. [01:48:40] First is resolution number 2016-31. [01:48:44] It's a resolution of the city of New Port Richey, [01:48:45] Pascoe County, Florida, adopting the tentative levying [01:48:48] of ad valorem taxes for all non-exempt real [01:48:51] and personal property in New Port Richey, [01:48:53] Pascoe County, Florida, for fiscal year October 1, 2016 [01:48:57] to September 30, 2017. [01:49:01] Very good, entertain a motion? [01:49:03] Move to approve. [01:49:04] We have a motion and a second to the maker. [01:49:06] No, sir, thanks. [01:49:07] Second? [01:49:08] Further discussion? [01:49:10] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [01:49:12] Aye. [01:49:13] Opposed, like sign, next. [01:49:14] Second resolution, Mr. Mayor, is resolution number 2016-25, [01:49:19] a resolution of the city of New Port Richey, [01:49:20] of Pascoe County, Florida, [01:49:21] adopting the tentative operating budget [01:49:23] for fiscal year 2016-2017, [01:49:26] and the capital improvement program [01:49:28] for fiscal year 2016-2017, providing for an effective date. [01:49:34] Didn't we just do 25? [01:49:36] No, 31. [01:49:38] Oh, I'm sorry. [01:49:39] They're sequenced backwards from what you might expect. [01:49:42] Entertain a motion? [01:49:44] Move for approval. [01:49:46] We have a second, second to the maker? [01:49:48] To the second? [01:49:49] No, sir, thank you. [01:49:51] Further discussion? [01:49:51] I just want to reiterate one thing that I mentioned [01:49:54] at the last meeting during communication [01:49:56] that I'd like to add an addendum to this year's budget, [01:50:02] that the state's no new monies be spent [01:50:05] until 30 days after we get the audit [01:50:10] from fiscal year 15-16, [01:50:14] and those monies not be spent on new projects, [01:50:17] capital improvement projects, [01:50:19] or filling any open positions. [01:50:22] I'll take that in the form of a motion. [01:50:24] Well, do we have a second? [01:50:26] Should that not be an agenda item, an agenda item? [01:50:29] And we just... [01:50:30] He can declare an emergency. [01:50:32] He's... [01:50:33] Yeah. [01:50:34] I'm just making sure we're doing it right. [01:50:35] Well, I think we are doing it right, [01:50:37] since he's asking... [01:50:38] And I agree, it should be up to vote. [01:50:40] A motion, I'm going to ask for a vote on his motion, [01:50:43] and then a vote on the... [01:50:46] He has to get a second first. [01:50:48] But he's got to have a second, [01:50:48] if somebody would like to second that. [01:50:53] Hearing no one second, the motion dies for lack of a second. [01:50:57] We're back to the original motion. [01:51:00] Any further discussion? [01:51:02] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [01:51:05] Aye. [01:51:06] Opposed, like sign. [01:51:07] Aye. [01:51:08] Motion passes four to one. [01:51:10] We are now to communications and reports. [01:51:13] I will point out, if we have a chance, [01:51:17] there is a band books concert in the park, [01:51:20] and drop by it on your way home. [01:51:22] The last two have been excellent. [01:51:24] I would suspect this one would be as well. [01:51:26] With that, I'm done. [01:51:28] Councilman? [01:51:29] Yes. [01:51:30] Just real quick, thank you to Heather Fiorentino. [01:51:32] The Parks and Recreation Youth Advisory Board [01:51:34] was out as well helping. [01:51:35] And everybody that helped at the 9-11 ceremony [01:51:38] was awesome, as it is every year. [01:51:40] It was really nice to have it back at the amphitheater. [01:51:43] Not to give a too big a plug, [01:51:45] but it was really nice having that monitor there [01:51:48] for the slide show. [01:51:48] And it just kind of shows you [01:51:50] why we installed that in the park. [01:51:52] But the ceremony overall was phenomenal. [01:51:54] It is every year, and I hope we continue to host it. [01:51:58] Yes, in light of that, I did hand off to Ms. Mann's pins [01:52:03] that were provided to the committee [01:52:07] through a donation from Mr. Gillis. [01:52:09] And for her to distribute to council [01:52:12] who didn't get it, or any of her staff. [01:52:14] Thank you. [01:52:15] Councilman Davis? [01:52:16] Nothing. [01:52:17] Deputy Mayor? [01:52:18] I want to thank Elaine for inviting me to Dulcet's [01:52:21] to get dressed up on a Saturday afternoon. [01:52:24] Well, almost dressed up. [01:52:25] I didn't have a coat on, I had a tie. [01:52:27] But she had her youth advisory board there, [01:52:29] and they're always such a treat to be around. [01:52:33] They're so engaging, and it was nice to be invited [01:52:39] and being indicated that it was nice to be invited. [01:52:41] And you go and get to stay, [01:52:43] but you're more than welcome to stop in. [01:52:45] But they were a good group. [01:52:47] They are, and we appreciate that. [01:52:48] The 9-11 event, it's always nice [01:52:53] to see the community come together like that. [01:52:58] But also to see, and of course it was on Sunday night, [01:53:01] it had to be earlier because of church [01:53:03] and some other things. [01:53:04] But the different parts of the ceremony, [01:53:10] the kids coming up and singing, all that, [01:53:14] it was quite nice, and it was nice to be there. [01:53:18] And luckily, we only had a couple of drops of rain. [01:53:22] I know that in the manager's report, [01:53:23] she's indicated to us our upcoming meeting [01:53:26] between now and the end of the month. [01:53:29] Ms. Fierce, you were able to give me something yesterday [01:53:32] with regards to the wayfinding, that little package [01:53:36] that has all of the signs as they exist today. [01:53:41] Is there a possibility you could share that [01:53:43] or get it to the manager so that all my colleagues [01:53:47] could get that? [01:53:48] I just happened to be here yesterday. [01:53:50] Because I think it's very helpful to know [01:53:53] we drive by them all the time. [01:53:55] They become a blur to us. [01:53:58] But I think it's important for our meeting on the 19th [01:54:02] that we understand what's there now [01:54:05] so that we can talk about all those moving parts [01:54:08] when it comes to the wayfinding signage. [01:54:11] It'll go out tomorrow, Mr. Deputy Mayor. [01:54:13] And then, I mentioned this to Ms. Mann yesterday. [01:54:19] Everybody got their new water bill statements in the mail. [01:54:23] And I just think it's nice to have this go along with it. [01:54:27] But if we had a YouTube video or ability [01:54:31] to present it at council and say, this is what's gone out, [01:54:34] this is what this form's all about, [01:54:35] and put the new building next to it, [01:54:39] it explains it pretty well. [01:54:41] But sometimes you need visual aids to go along with that. [01:54:46] And we have a colleague who sends us [01:54:49] historical information periodically, Mr. Greg Smith. [01:54:54] And it's interesting that he sent back something [01:54:58] that was published in 1962 by the New Port City Rotary [01:55:03] History, but it really went back and talked about [01:55:07] when George Sims was around and the Sims Park and all that. [01:55:11] And what I found interesting is Sims, [01:55:14] this was back in 1929 after the crash. [01:55:17] It says, Sims told the service club, [01:55:19] the future of West Pasco depends on the revival [01:55:22] of the old-time community spirit [01:55:24] that prevailed during the early days. [01:55:26] He concluded New Port City needs a facelifting [01:55:29] and cannot afford to rest on its past laurels [01:55:32] as the beauty spot it is to compete [01:55:34] with other fast-developing areas in Florida. [01:55:36] And it's amazing how it's like deja vu [01:55:40] over and over and over again. [01:55:44] Unfortunately, that's the way it is, [01:55:45] but I just thought it'd be a little humorous [01:55:47] to share that with you, so I appreciate it, Mr. Mayor. [01:55:50] Thank you. [01:55:51] Ms. Manns, anything? [01:55:52] At this time, Mr. Mayor. [01:55:53] In that case, I would entertain a motion to adjourn. [01:55:55] Move to adjourn. [01:55:56] I'd like to call this meeting of the Community Redevelopment [01:55:59] Agency to order. [01:56:01] We have the roll call, please. [01:56:02] Chairman Marlowe? [01:56:03] Here, ma'am. [01:56:04] Director Phillips? [01:56:04] Here. [01:56:05] Director DeBella-Thomas? [01:56:06] Here. [01:56:06] Director Starkey? [01:56:07] Here. [01:56:08] Director Davis? [01:56:09] Here. [01:56:09] Executive Director Manns? [01:56:11] Here. [01:56:11] City Attorney Driscoll? [01:56:12] Here. [01:56:13] Thank you, Ms. Manns. [01:56:14] We have an item on the agenda approving a CRA budget. [01:56:18] Mrs. Spears, if you could present the budget. [01:56:21] Good evening. [01:56:24] Before you is the CRA's budget for fiscal year 17, [01:56:30] which includes proposed CRA revenue, funding sources, [01:56:34] and the expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year. [01:56:41] This budget, the hard copy that you have before you, [01:56:45] has changes made, changes have been [01:56:49] made compared to the one you received electronically. [01:56:54] Mario and I got together and did an assessment [01:56:58] of the residential incentive program and the business [01:57:01] incentive program as it stands for fiscal year 16. [01:57:07] And we were better able to identify those unused portions [01:57:11] of that program and identify how much funds [01:57:15] could be rolled forward to next year to be used. [01:57:18] So you will see that revenue has increased some [01:57:23] compared to what was presented to you electronically. [01:57:28] As far as expenditures go, the total dollars proposed [01:57:33] is $2,506,495, which includes the spending [01:57:45] of those CRA revenues. [01:57:49] If you have any questions, and like I said, [01:57:51] this is a bit different from what [01:57:53] was presented electronically. [01:57:57] So if you have any questions, I will respond to them. [01:58:01] This is a public hearing. [01:58:02] I will open the meeting for public comment. [01:58:07] Seeing no one come forward, I will bring it back [01:58:09] to the CRA board. [01:58:11] Questions, gentlemen, are there? [01:58:16] I'm going to make the statement that please [01:58:21] try to give us something and then tell us what you've changed. [01:58:31] As my other colleagues do, we spend valuable time [01:58:35] taking what you give us so that when we show up here, [01:58:38] we at least look like we understand what we have. [01:58:42] And this is the third time in the last three meetings, [01:58:47] either special or this, that we come up [01:58:50] and we get something on the dais. [01:58:53] And I'm pretty good at doing it on the fly. [01:58:57] And I have my considerable information. [01:59:01] But I don't know that I'm doing the public's will [01:59:05] if I don't get it and have time to really make sure [01:59:09] that I'm comfortable with it, instead of saying [01:59:13] I'm not going to vote on it. [01:59:15] So I have to make that statement because I'm an old ball player [01:59:22] and three strikes and I'm usually out. [01:59:24] And it's just disappointing to me [01:59:27] when we go through this exercise. [01:59:31] And over and above that, Mr. Mayor, [01:59:33] I still have issues. [01:59:37] And I know this year we have money [01:59:39] to go back in and re-look at our CRA. [01:59:45] So we'll get a chance to do that because it's in the budget. [01:59:48] But I still am not happy that a few years ago, [01:59:54] we turned it into partially a debt service fund, number one. [01:59:59] And number two. [02:00:00] show transfers from this group, from this agency, into the city, into the general fund [02:00:07] or into the city council. The CRA was specifically designed to be an overlay on your city so [02:00:18] that you could gain additional tax dollars, ad valorem dollars that weren't paid to the [02:00:26] county, so that you didn't have to go and beg for that money or negotiate with them. [02:00:34] And though I know people are upset in some parts of this county still that we did it [02:00:40] over almost the entire city, it was allowed, we did it. That being the case, there's money [02:00:47] that's being transferred into the general fund. The CRA has specific elements that it [02:00:52] can fund itself. Community policing, special events, other items. And to me, to take that [02:01:02] money and put it in the general fund and then disperse it some ways, to me, doesn't really [02:01:08] let the agency do what it's supposed to do and take credit for that. And I believe that [02:01:16] now that the agency and the revenue streams have returned in some way, there needs to [02:01:23] be better thought, and when we do our CA documents, of how we can do that. Because we're asking [02:01:29] for extra officers, we could identify that as a CRA and it's being paid by there instead [02:01:34] of ad valorem and general funds. So I'm off my soapbox, but that's, to me, the CRA has [02:01:41] a specific purpose. And I don't believe that we are meeting all the benchmark tests that [02:01:47] we should have with that. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. [02:01:49] Thank you, Wilson. Any other comments? Would entertain a motion? [02:01:55] No, we have a resolution. [02:01:56] I'm sorry, we need to read the resolution first. Thank you. [02:01:59] Resolution number 2016-26, a resolution of the City of New Port Richey, Florida, Community [02:02:04] Redevelopment Agency, a public body corporate and politic adopting the 2016-2017 operating [02:02:09] budget, adopting the 2016-2017 five-year work program for the Community Redevelopment [02:02:15] Agency of the City of New Port Richey, Florida, and providing effective date. [02:02:20] I would entertain a motion. [02:02:22] Move for approval. [02:02:23] Second. [02:02:24] Second. To the maker? [02:02:25] No, sir, I'm okay. [02:02:26] Second. [02:02:27] Councilman Starkey? [02:02:28] No comments, thank you. [02:02:29] Councilman Deval Thomas? [02:02:30] Thank you. I appreciate the comments that Mr. Phyllis made, because it is, you know, [02:02:36] it's frustrating to do the vote and not feel, you know, that what I'm looking at at the [02:02:46] last minute has changed to that point. I trust the numbers are good, but it is frustrating. [02:02:52] Thank you. [02:02:53] I would echo the comments of Mr. Phillips. There really does need to be a cutoff at some [02:03:03] discrete point ahead of the meeting where we can get the final, final, final, final, [02:03:09] final version of a document and have a chance to actually read it before it's presented [02:03:14] to us and we have to vote on it. [02:03:17] Duly noted, Mr. Mayor. [02:03:18] Thank you. [02:03:19] If there's no further discussion, all those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [02:03:23] Aye. [02:03:24] Opposed, like sign. [02:03:25] Motion passes. There's no further business. I'd entertain a motion to adjourn. [02:03:29] Move to adjourn. [02:03:30] Thank you.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 5Communications
- 6Adjournment