Kimley-Horn briefed council on extending the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) through 2049, a plan due by October projecting $164 million.
3 items on the agenda
On the agenda
- 1Call to Order - Roll Call▶ 0:00
- 2
You arrived here from a search for “Bob Smallwood” — transcript expanded below
Discussion on Future CRA Projects
discussedCouncil held a work session to discuss future CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) projects, with consultants Kimley-Horn presenting an update on the redevelopment plan that must be adopted by October 2019 and would extend the CRA from 2019 to 2049. Projections show $164 million in cumulative net revenue over 30 years, and six redevelopment areas were identified. Council and public discussed potential projects including a Grand Boulevard bike path along the river, gateway improvements, historic district designation, and density issues around the Hacienda site.
6041 Florida AvenueCentral AvenueGrand BoulevardMain StreetSims ParkAltman Law OfficeCity of Port RicheyFlorida DOTHaciendaKimley-HornMetropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)Orange Lake ApartmentsPasco CountyBob SmallwoodCouncilman AltmanDebbie ManzFred KentGrady PridgenJohn CainKeith GrimmingerKelly KlepperMr. Kasson2012 redevelopment planBusiness facade grantCRA redevelopment plan 2019-2049Capital improvement plan 15-16Finding of Necessity (FON)Former community hospital siteGateway programGibbs studyJazz School FiestaLeisure Lane and Van DorenMagnuson area / US 19Main Street programRivergate areaRiverside Inn / North River areaSouthgate CenterState Statute 163Summer youth sidewalk development programTIF (Tax Increment Financing)ULI Technical Assistance Panel▶ Jump to 0:15 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:15] This is for discussion of future CRA projects. [00:00:20] Ms. Manz, would you like to get us started here? [00:00:23] I will, Mr. Mayor. [00:00:25] As a reminder to you all, we hired Kimley Horn in April [00:00:31] of 2017, the purpose of which was [00:00:35] to assist us in providing a CRA redevelopment plan, which [00:00:39] would span our current plan from 2018 [00:00:44] for another 30 years, which would take us to 2048. [00:00:50] As part of their efforts, they identified [00:00:53] six areas of the city where some redevelopment efforts [00:00:59] should occur. [00:01:01] They were the former community hospital site, the Rivergate [00:01:04] area, Southgate Center, Magnuson area of 19, actually all of 19. [00:01:12] The Riverside Inn, or what's referred [00:01:15] to as the North River area, the downtown area, [00:01:18] and Leisure Lane and Van Doren. [00:01:22] We have Kimley Horn with us this evening, [00:01:24] and I'm going to give them an opportunity to bring you [00:01:26] up to date on where they are with their plans. [00:01:30] But before I do, I want to remind you [00:01:35] that the city is required to completely adopt [00:01:41] the new plan by October of 19. [00:01:45] That is our legal requirement. [00:01:48] More important than that, though, I [00:01:51] think it's in our best interest to move a little quicker [00:01:55] than that. [00:01:56] In fact, I'd say move quickly based [00:01:59] on some of the discussion that has taken place [00:02:02] at the state level in regards to CRA plans. [00:02:08] I don't think the tool will go away based on what I've seen, [00:02:13] but I do think that there may be some amendments to the plan [00:02:17] that make it a little bit more difficult for us [00:02:19] to administer projects in the best interests of the city. [00:02:26] There are two things that we put at your places tonight. [00:02:29] The first is the New Port Richey financial projections. [00:02:35] And I think the most exciting part about that [00:02:40] is that we show $164 million in cumulative net revenue, which [00:02:48] means we can do a lot of good over the next 30 years. [00:02:55] $233 million, I think it's important to say, [00:02:59] is contributed by the city and the county [00:03:02] collectively over the 30-year period of time. [00:03:06] $107 million by the county and $126 million by the city. [00:03:15] The purpose in large part of tonight's meeting [00:03:18] is to discuss and consider projects [00:03:22] that you might want to have specifically [00:03:24] identified in the plan document before we bring it [00:03:28] to you for final adoption. [00:03:31] In that regard, I spent some time earlier today [00:03:35] with Councilman Altman, and he penciled out [00:03:39] a few of his ideas for projects. [00:03:43] And we will bring that into the discussion [00:03:46] as we get further along this evening. [00:03:49] But as I indicated, Kimley Horn is in attendance this evening. [00:03:54] We've got Keith Grimminger and Kelly Klepper, [00:03:58] both who have been very involved in our project. [00:04:02] And I'd like to give them an opportunity [00:04:03] to bring you up to date. [00:04:11] Thank you all. [00:04:12] Excuse me, getting over a little bit of a cold here. [00:04:14] Seems like we Floridians. [00:04:17] You can sit down there, because you [00:04:18] might want to say something in the morning. [00:04:21] Yeah, we Floridians now, if the temperature [00:04:24] dips below 60 degrees, we just don't know what to do. [00:04:28] Excuse me. [00:04:28] So very quickly, I'm going to walk you through the update. [00:04:32] You've seen portions of this. [00:04:33] I've edited it quite down. [00:04:35] The goal here is to talk about the new projects [00:04:39] and the new opportunities that we see. [00:04:42] All right, so again, you know who we are. [00:04:46] We'll talk about the public engagement. [00:04:49] One of the things we're very proud of going through this [00:04:52] is we really reached out to the entire community, [00:04:54] got a lot of good feedback, categorized that. [00:04:57] And we listened to the community and yourselves, [00:05:00] what could be done and how we move forward with it. [00:05:03] So as a summary, they talked about many things. [00:05:06] Take advantage of our assets. [00:05:08] The downtown should be the driver. [00:05:09] You can see these here. [00:05:11] You've heard them before. [00:05:12] And we're going to continue to build upon that. [00:05:15] Getting to the meat of it, we talked [00:05:18] about redevelopment strategy and identified several things. [00:05:22] One of the things that Ms. Manns didn't mention [00:05:25] is we talked about some quick wins. [00:05:27] You've already started with your gateway program. [00:05:29] I think that's great. [00:05:31] I think it offers a lot. [00:05:32] I think following up that possibly [00:05:34] with lighting and other opportunities [00:05:36] could also be a great asset. [00:05:39] And then public art and how, indeed, it's [00:05:41] one of the things the community brought out. [00:05:43] Where can we incorporate those? [00:05:44] How do those play into the overall picture? [00:05:47] We want to build on our investments [00:05:49] that you've already taken place. [00:05:51] We've got Sims Park, what's going [00:05:53] to happen with the Orange Lake Apartments, what's [00:05:55] been done on the infrastructure, Central Avenue, the Main Street [00:05:59] landings, all good projects that are just bringing some vitality [00:06:03] to the overall area. [00:06:06] So we talked about some incentives [00:06:08] and some redevelopment plans. [00:06:09] These are all spelled out in the formal plan, [00:06:12] the business facade grant, the summer youth sidewalk [00:06:16] development program, things like this [00:06:17] that can keep the project moving forward. [00:06:19] You also, during this past year, also [00:06:21] had a ULI technical assistance panel [00:06:24] looking at revitalization of the residential aspects of this. [00:06:28] Very good information that came out of that [00:06:30] will be also incorporated into the plan as an appendix. [00:06:35] And then overall, city beautification opportunities, [00:06:40] code enforcement. [00:06:41] We know there's a lot of opportunities [00:06:42] there to continue to enhance the community, maintenance [00:06:46] programs, and waste pickup. [00:06:50] So the targeted redevelopment areas, [00:06:52] Ms. Manns just mentioned those. [00:06:55] This is an opportunity. [00:06:56] These are what we've identified, but we truly [00:06:58] believe that there are more opportunities out there. [00:07:01] We're seeing that every day. [00:07:02] I think you all are as well. [00:07:03] So we really want to hear from you [00:07:05] all what those opportunities are as we continue to move forward. [00:07:12] What we've identified is a culmination of over 100 acres [00:07:16] and between $100 to $125 million investment [00:07:21] with a huge taxable value that's added [00:07:24] to that at the end of the day. [00:07:26] And then we went through some financial analysis. [00:07:29] Again, this is all in it. [00:07:30] We show from 18 to 48, but obviously as we submit that, [00:07:35] this will adjust from 19 to 49. [00:07:38] As Ms. Manns mentioned, it needs to be in by October. [00:07:41] And we show what the five-year increment value will be. [00:07:45] We obviously now have better information [00:07:47] on what fiscal year 18 is, what 19 would be, [00:07:52] and move forward from there. [00:07:55] The next steps. [00:07:56] One of the things we've been talking about [00:07:59] is some additional properties that would expand the CRA. [00:08:04] And in doing so, we would bring back [00:08:08] to you a sub-district mapping. [00:08:10] It shows and identifies the eight parcels [00:08:13] that have been identified. [00:08:17] With that, to follow state statute 163, [00:08:20] we have to do a finding of necessity or blight, [00:08:23] commonly known as an FON. [00:08:25] Our research will pull that forward [00:08:27] and identify to meet the criteria [00:08:30] the state statute is looking for. [00:08:32] And then also do a five and 10-year investment [00:08:34] program of what would happen with those properties [00:08:37] potentially. [00:08:39] We see that being anywhere between 60 to 90 days. [00:08:43] We believe we can move pretty quickly on that [00:08:45] and incorporate that into the plan. [00:08:49] So with that, the final community redevelopment plan [00:08:53] would be put forward as an update. [00:08:56] We see that, again, maybe 30 to 60 days after that. [00:09:00] And all of these are probably on the longer time frame. [00:09:04] We believe we can move quite quickly [00:09:06] on these with your assistance. [00:09:09] Once we get the approval and we talk [00:09:11] about the extension of the CRA, Ms. Mann just touched on that. [00:09:14] So again, go from 2019 to 2049. [00:09:19] And in particular, those two, the approval and the extension, [00:09:23] could be combined to shrink that down several days there, [00:09:28] several months possibly. [00:09:30] So that's really kind of the whirlwind to it. [00:09:35] We've always enjoyed working up here. [00:09:37] And we'd like to hear your thoughts and ideas on what [00:09:40] are the other redevelopment opportunities [00:09:42] that you are seeing, listing, and believe [00:09:45] can take place that we should include in this project. [00:09:49] So with that, I'll turn it back over to you all. [00:09:51] Thank you. [00:09:55] Stay close in case we've got some questions as we go. [00:09:59] With some trepidation, I want to open it up for public comment. [00:10:04] Please keep it brief, on topic. [00:10:08] If anybody has any thoughts, come on down. [00:10:12] Give us your name and address for the record, please. [00:10:14] I'm Bob Smallwood on the Mee and Quartz. [00:10:24] I guess just a couple of comments. [00:10:25] And some of it has to do with the details. [00:10:27] I was looking at the sheet with the numbers on it. [00:10:30] And part of me, I was glad to see that you're actually [00:10:33] using some of the study work going into the CRA. [00:10:36] Because I keep seeing the Gibbs study and ULI. [00:10:38] And I keep thinking, OK, what are we [00:10:39] going to do with these studies? [00:10:41] And I'm glad to see that there's some thought put together [00:10:44] to actually incorporate and use those studies. [00:10:48] I mean, the main thing that always jumps out at me [00:10:50] is just the debt services on the rec center. [00:10:52] About $900,000 a year, it just amazes me [00:10:55] how much that center costs us. [00:10:59] But the question I had, I noticed [00:11:00] that 10% of the TIF goes to the general fund. [00:11:06] But I noticed on the spreadsheet here, [00:11:07] it says a CRA general fund loan. [00:11:10] But I don't see any recapture of that loan anywhere. [00:11:12] So I didn't know what that general fund loan meant. [00:11:17] Another net, I was glad to see the Main Street program funded, [00:11:20] extended as well, too. [00:11:21] There's a lot of work trying to revitalize the Main Street [00:11:24] program. [00:11:24] I don't think it's funded well enough if you really [00:11:26] want to be a Main Street city. [00:11:27] But that's a topic we can have at a later discussion. [00:11:30] So thank you for your time. [00:11:32] Thank you. [00:11:32] Anyone else? [00:11:41] Go ahead. [00:11:43] John Cain, 6041 Florida Avenue. [00:11:46] I don't know if this plan is already included. [00:11:48] And if it is, I'd be more than glad to get away from here [00:11:51] and sit down again. [00:11:52] But I've been talking for a long time [00:11:57] about establishing a bike path on Grand Boulevard [00:12:01] that follows the river. [00:12:04] The city of New Port Richey has been discussing, [00:12:07] and whether or not they'll do it, [00:12:08] I don't know if it will ever come to fruition, [00:12:11] but bringing a path underneath the bridge [00:12:16] so that you would be able to connect onto Grand Boulevard [00:12:21] without ever crossing 19. [00:12:25] I think it's a fantastic idea. [00:12:26] I think it would be one of our really strongest things [00:12:31] to promote our downtown because of what's [00:12:35] going on with our downtown and what they're [00:12:37] doing for the development of their point out there, what's [00:12:41] going on out there. [00:12:43] And if we could blend those together, [00:12:47] I think it would be amazing because I [00:12:49] don't know anyone else on the West Coast of Florida [00:12:51] that would have anything else like that. [00:12:53] And I don't think the investment would be much [00:12:56] because we have the room on Grand Boulevard. [00:13:00] We would, of course, have to change it. [00:13:02] There would be some logistical changes. [00:13:04] It would become a one-way. [00:13:06] It would leave room for a huge path [00:13:10] that could be for biking, rollerblading, [00:13:12] and a lot of things. [00:13:13] And the most beautiful scenery, I mean, honestly, [00:13:16] I don't know of any other place. [00:13:18] When I'm not here, that's what I miss. [00:13:20] I miss going along that river. [00:13:22] So I'm hoping that that's in the works [00:13:24] and that's something that's going to be considered [00:13:26] because I think it's going to blend in with the Hacienda [00:13:29] and everything that you're doing downtown. [00:13:31] I think it's going to just bring it all together for people [00:13:33] that want to bring their families right on bikes [00:13:37] and do both things. [00:13:37] So thank you. [00:13:38] Thank you, John. [00:13:39] It is actually one of the topics we're going to discuss. [00:13:41] Mr. Altman had included it in his list. [00:13:44] Did I just give him an update from the MPO board? [00:13:46] I was going to ask, Ms. Mansour, [00:13:48] if you could give us an update on where we are. [00:13:50] At the last MPO meeting, [00:13:51] Metropolitan Planning Organization, [00:13:53] the board approved a feasibility study [00:13:57] and we have an interlocal agreement [00:13:58] between New Port Richey City, New Port Richey, [00:13:59] and Pasco County that's approved. [00:14:02] So they're currently working on that study with the DOT [00:14:04] trying to get a cost basis of what it's going to cost, [00:14:08] what it's going to look like. [00:14:09] So it's in the works. [00:14:10] We've been told about six months for that study [00:14:12] and then hopefully the city of New Port Richey, [00:14:14] New Port Richey, and the county working together [00:14:15] will be able to act on it. [00:14:16] So it's in the works. [00:14:17] That's great. [00:14:18] I can't wait to see it before I get too old to bike it. [00:14:21] Tricycle. [00:14:23] It may be one of the motorized trikes, John. [00:14:28] Anyone else? [00:14:30] Seeing no one else come back, [00:14:32] I'm going to bring it back to council. [00:14:34] Mr. Allman, you did a marvelous job [00:14:35] putting these proposals together. [00:14:37] Would you like to kick off the discussion? [00:14:40] If that's all right with the rest of me, I'd be happy to. [00:14:43] I would like to note back to the Kimley-Horne study, [00:14:47] just their first page, [00:14:49] just to read the headlines they put [00:14:53] on the front page of their study, [00:14:57] that the 2012 redevelopment plan was... [00:15:00] an excellent document to work off of. [00:15:02] So it hasn't been that long since there was an update, [00:15:05] but because we've hit this 30-year mark [00:15:08] and the pressures, potential pressures from the state, [00:15:11] that I guess we're having this discussion [00:15:13] about a 30-year bond, a bondable time period. [00:15:18] Then it says, do not start over. [00:15:20] Validate, update, implement. [00:15:23] So, and then create a strategic action plan. [00:15:27] So when Debbie put this one document in front of us [00:15:33] and I wanted to kind of let those numbers become [00:15:39] like a jump-off point for me, [00:15:41] because when you look at all that money [00:15:43] that is projected to come in [00:15:45] from a relatively natural growth curve, [00:15:50] and then they showed another slide that they put up [00:15:54] was the bondable or the project cost for, [00:15:58] I think they were looking at them in 10-year increments, [00:16:00] kind of like, you know, [00:16:01] what would be the first tranche of projects to produce? [00:16:07] There had been discussion in the past about, [00:16:10] first of all, a sort of opposition or hesitation [00:16:18] to any kind of financing. [00:16:20] And when it comes to some of these projects, [00:16:24] if the projects will help to actually bring the investment [00:16:31] to improve the tax base [00:16:33] and to improve some of the other [00:16:35] general fund revenue sources, [00:16:37] that I'm hopeful that this particular council [00:16:40] will be open to an investment strategy [00:16:44] that we can create over the next five years [00:16:48] through the budget process [00:16:49] as we get into it in the summertime, [00:16:51] and then, you know, with a successful amendment, [00:16:55] have, you know, a good footing on where we're headed. [00:17:01] And I looked back at the capital improvement plan [00:17:04] from 15-16, and there wasn't a lot of future projections [00:17:10] of what those projects were, [00:17:12] and there wasn't a lot of adherence to that plan. [00:17:14] Every year, it just kind of gets redone. [00:17:16] But when it comes to the CRA plan, [00:17:18] once you approve it and you're set on it, [00:17:22] then it kind of should hopefully move forward. [00:17:26] Overlap that with the tremendous enthusiasm [00:17:31] that we've got going on right now in the city [00:17:33] and the interest in the investment community. [00:17:37] I know we've got the owner of the land at the Hacienda [00:17:41] who has suggested that he wants to do something, [00:17:44] and that's the Altman Law Office property, [00:17:49] my family's old property. [00:17:52] And so his interest may be more density-related, [00:17:56] and I think that we are going to hear [00:17:58] from him shortly, hopefully. [00:18:00] But I see Mr. Kasson in the audience, [00:18:04] and I had a conversation with Mr. Kasson [00:18:06] shortly after the election about his opinion [00:18:10] on the historic nature of our historic walkable downtown, [00:18:16] where, if I'm going to paraphrase [00:18:18] and hopefully get it right, [00:18:20] his recommendation was we look at [00:18:24] establishing a little historic district, [00:18:26] which I think we have a historic committee [00:18:27] that's getting reconstituted, [00:18:30] which would mean, if we have a willing investor, [00:18:32] that we have to capture that investment incentive [00:18:35] and redirect it. [00:18:37] To me, redirecting it to the gateway [00:18:40] is a natural way that a lot of folks have talked about, [00:18:44] increased density and residential going out that way. [00:18:49] But I think there are some specific projects [00:18:51] and discussions that are going to need [00:18:52] to come up sooner than later, [00:18:54] and it really rolls off of what you all were saying [00:18:56] about the Hacienda's going to be open soon, [00:18:58] where's everybody going to park, [00:19:00] Jazz School Fiesta's coming, [00:19:01] what's going to happen with that footprint, [00:19:03] developers are interested in building. [00:19:07] So the third leg of this little introductory comments [00:19:12] that I have becomes the, [00:19:19] the boat ramp, the other side of the river, [00:19:25] the parking issues with the trailers, [00:19:27] and the need for us to look at the old, old plans [00:19:31] of Fred Kent and the folks we had almost 30 years ago [00:19:35] who came in and said, [00:19:37] your downtown should come out to the street. [00:19:40] And what we're hearing from Tallahassee, [00:19:43] which is the new Speaker of the House, [00:19:45] who seems to be focused on infrastructure projects [00:19:48] with the use of CRA money [00:19:50] versus direct payments to developers. [00:19:55] So, I mean, we've already heard [00:19:57] what Tallahassee wants to see from CRAs, [00:20:00] and we already know we're probably the only CRA [00:20:03] in the state that has a full city CRA, [00:20:06] which has been problematic, I think, in some areas. [00:20:12] But the good news is the county seems all in [00:20:16] on supporting our redevelopment plans, [00:20:18] and I think the time is right for us [00:20:20] to try to figure that all out. [00:20:23] So while we're at this 30-year plan, [00:20:25] and we have a great plan, [00:20:27] I think there's some immediate things [00:20:29] that are pending quickly [00:20:31] that could probably benefit by more effort [00:20:34] by our engineering firm to help us to visualize [00:20:39] what it might look like and what these projects, [00:20:42] these initial trance of projects might cost, look like, [00:20:46] so that we can all discuss them and decide, [00:20:50] you know, if we support them and either move on [00:20:53] or accept, you know, what's kind of coming naturally. [00:20:58] So that's my thing. [00:20:59] This is a list of things we've all talked about, [00:21:02] I think, at one point or another. [00:21:03] I just tried to compile it for discussion, [00:21:05] so I'm not necessarily wanting to talk about all of that. [00:21:10] But that's my spiel to you. [00:21:11] I think it's an incredibly important time. [00:21:12] We're right in a critical juncture, [00:21:14] and to look at that gateway project [00:21:17] that kind of follows the county's plan, [00:21:19] to look at a small area. [00:21:21] There's interested parties and folks with money [00:21:24] who are coming around saying they'd like to participate, [00:21:27] and I think we ought to be at the table [00:21:29] with our own team to say, [00:21:31] this is the public-private partnership. [00:21:35] How far do we go, and where do we start? [00:21:38] Very good. [00:21:39] May I ask him a question? [00:21:40] Yeah. [00:21:40] You had mentioned higher density, [00:21:41] and then you had also mentioned the gateway area [00:21:44] west of the bridge, and also Grady Pridgen's property [00:21:47] across in the Hacienda. [00:21:48] Are you looking at higher density in both of those areas, [00:21:51] or one or the other, or we're not getting [00:21:52] into specifics tonight? [00:21:53] He's indicated initially that he wanted [00:21:55] a lot of high density in the downtown, [00:21:57] and that he's not got that, [00:22:00] and he wants to just build apartments, [00:22:02] and we need to see what he wants to do. [00:22:04] But my point is, if he tells us what we want to do, [00:22:09] and then the public, and some of the folks [00:22:10] that have been here around a long time, [00:22:13] if Mr. Kasson is representative of a lot of our folks [00:22:17] in town who want to kind of not see a big tall building [00:22:21] go across from the Hacienda, or all residential, [00:22:25] or whatever he's got in mind, [00:22:27] that we have other pieces of property, [00:22:30] like our church property, and even the piece
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 3Adjournment▶ 22:32