Auditors delivered a clean FY2018 opinion with two lingering internal control findings, and Pasco County's MPO previewed its long-range transportation plan.
23 items on the agenda · 18 decisions recorded
On the agenda
- 1Call to Order – Roll Call▶ 0:00
- 2
Pledge of Allegiance
A Girl Scout named Madison led the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by a moment of silence for servicemen and women.
▶ Jump to 0:17 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:00:17] We have a Girl Scout in attendance tonight by the name of Madison. [00:00:20] I'm going to ask her to come up and lead everybody in the Pledge of Allegiance, [00:00:23] and then if you would all remain standing for a moment of silence in honor of our servicemen and women at home and abroad. [00:00:29] Madison, come on up. [00:00:40] I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, [00:00:45] and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, [00:00:51] with liberty and justice for all.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 3
Moment of Silence
discussedCasey Kersey from AECOM, working with the Pasco County MPO, gave an informational update on the County's ongoing long-range transportation plan, encouraging public participation via an MPO survey. The plan is scheduled for adoption on December 11th, and presenters indicated they would return in a few months with the Cost Affordable component.
AECOMPasco County MPOCasey KerseyTania GormanCost Affordable PlanDecember 11th adoption dateMPO surveyPasco County Long-Range Transportation Plan▶ Jump to 1:00 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:01:00] Thank you. [00:01:01] And thank you, Madison. [00:01:08] Next, we have a special guest, Casey Kersey, from the Pasco County MPO. [00:01:14] I'd like to ask her to come up and say a few words. [00:01:23] Good evening, and thank you for hosting us tonight. [00:01:27] I'm with my public outreach partner, Tania Gorman, with the Pasco MPO. [00:01:32] I am Casey Kersey, and I work for AECOM, and I do a lot of public outreach for the Pasco MPO and for Pasco County. [00:01:39] So we appreciate this information update tonight. [00:01:42] We just wanted to let you know that right now, Pasco County is in the midst of doing a long-range transportation plan. [00:01:48] You may have heard of it. [00:01:50] It is a live document that's always adopted by the county. [00:01:53] It covers all the cities and the county, and it's federal spending, federal money, [00:01:58] so you want to get involved because you want the federal money to come to Pasco County. [00:02:02] It's for everyone. [00:02:03] So I just wanted to make sure you knew it was just getting going. [00:02:07] You have business cards in front of you with the link to the MPO survey that's going on right now, [00:02:16] and we are hoping to adopt it by December. [00:02:19] The schedule date is December 11th. [00:02:21] We'll be back in front of you in a few months with the Cost Affordable, [00:02:24] where we match the needs projects that have been identified by all the agencies to actual funding. [00:02:30] So that's when it will get exciting in a couple of months, and we'll be back. [00:02:33] But we wanted to let you know this was happening and invite everyone and everyone in the audience to participate. [00:02:38] Thank you very much. [00:02:39] And at home. [00:02:40] Yes, yes, please. [00:02:41] Yes, with the link. [00:02:42] There's a survey you can put in. [00:02:44] People are watching. [00:02:45] Yes, please, at home, everyone. [00:02:47] So thank you for hosting us tonight. [00:02:49] Thank you. [00:02:50] Thanks.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 4
Approval of July 2, 2019 Work Session and Regular Meeting Minutes
approvedCouncil approved the minutes from the July 2, 2019 work session and regular meeting.
- motion:Approve the July 2, 2019 work session and regular meeting minutes. (passed)
▶ Jump to 2:51 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:02:53] Next is the approval of the July 2nd, 2019 work session and regular meeting minutes. [00:02:59] Move for approval. [00:03:00] Second. [00:03:02] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:03:04] Aye. [00:03:05] Opposed, like sign. [00:03:07] Motion passes. [00:03:08] Next, approval of the July 9th work session minutes.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 5
Approval of July 9, 2019 Work Session Minutes
approvedCouncil approved the minutes from the July 9, 2019 Work Session.
- motion:Approve the July 9, 2019 Work Session Minutes. (passed)
▶ Jump to 3:09 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:03:11] Move for approval. [00:03:12] Second. [00:03:13] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:03:15] Aye. [00:03:16] Opposed, like sign. [00:03:17] Motion passes. [00:03:18] Next, annual report, Cultural Affairs Committee.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 6
Annual Report - Cultural Affairs Committee
tabledThe Cultural Affairs Committee annual report was deferred because the presenter, Rich Melton, was not present. Council moved on to the next agenda item.
- direction:Move past the Cultural Affairs Committee annual report and return to it later if Mr. Melton arrives. (none)
▶ Jump to 3:21 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:03:21] Mr. Mayor, I was expecting Mr. Rich Melton to be in attendance this evening to represent this report to you, [00:03:29] and I do not see him at the time. [00:03:32] So perhaps we can move on the agenda and see if perhaps he'll join us later. [00:03:39] All right. [00:03:40] If somebody sees him come in, let me know. [00:03:41] Thank you. [00:03:42] So we'll go now to the annual report for the Parks and Rec Advisory Board.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 7
You arrived here from a search for “5759 Rio Drive” — transcript expanded below
Annual Report - Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
Dave Schrader presented the annual report for the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board. Council had no questions and thanked him for the board's work.
▶ Jump to 3:45 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:03:46] We have Mr. Dave Schrader in attendance to represent the plan. [00:03:55] Good evening. [00:03:56] Dave Schrader, 5759 Rio Drive. [00:03:59] We presented the report to you on July. [00:04:02] It's in your packet. [00:04:04] Do you have any questions? [00:04:05] You get a report from the Parks and Rec Department on a weekly basis. [00:04:09] I didn't know if there's any other additional questions that you might have. [00:04:13] Questions, anyone? [00:04:16] We're doing a good job. [00:04:18] Thank you very much. [00:04:19] Yes, you are. [00:04:20] That was good.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 8
Annual Report - Parks & Recreation Youth Advisory Board
The Parks & Recreation Youth Advisory Board presented its annual report, highlighting 14 members and volunteer activities including Toys for Tots, Cotee River cleanups, comfort bags for domestic violence shelters, and special events. Staff also announced the Board was selected to receive the FRPA Voluntary Service Award of the Year at the upcoming state conference.
Florida Recreation and Park AssociationToys for TotsAlex CaravonaBertel ButlerFaith SanchezJessica MulcahyJohn Hudson-McMahonKayla MulcahyMs. SmithRyan Hamilton9-11 Memorial ProgramChildren's Winter Art ShowCotee River CleanupsFRPA Voluntary Service Award of the YearKids Zombie Fun RunNational Kids to Parks DayParks and Recreation Youth Advisory Board Annual ReportScare TrailsTeen Laser Tag▶ Jump to 4:22 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:04:22] Next is the annual report from the Parks and Rec Youth Advisory Board. [00:04:26] Yes, Ms. Smith. [00:04:37] All right. [00:04:38] Thank you for allowing our Parks and Recreation Youth Advisory Board [00:04:41] to present their annual report to you tonight. [00:04:44] Before they get started, I just received an email from the Executive Director [00:04:48] for the Florida Recreation and Park Association, [00:04:50] and I wanted to share that notification with you. [00:04:54] The email went on to say that they select one volunteer group for all the Parks [00:05:00] and Recreation Departments in the entire state each year [00:05:04] to receive the FRPA Voluntary Service Award of the Year. [00:05:09] And I'm very pleased to announce that our Youth Advisory Board has been selected [00:05:13] and they will receive this prestigious award at the State Conference in August. [00:05:18] Very good. [00:05:19] Thank you. [00:05:20] Good evening. [00:05:28] My name is Jessica Mulcahy. [00:05:30] The New Poetry Parks and Recreation Youth Advisory Board was established in 2006 [00:05:35] and is still going strong today with 14 young people that are in middle school, [00:05:43] high school, and college. [00:05:44] Thank you. [00:05:49] Good evening. [00:05:50] My name is Ryan Hamilton. [00:05:51] The board members are dedicated to the goal of making our community a great place to live. [00:05:55] This goal is accomplished through volunteering for programs such as Toys for Tots, [00:05:59] Cody River Cleanups, and making comfort bags for the children in domestic violence shelters. [00:06:09] Good evening. [00:06:10] I am John Hudson-McMahon. [00:06:13] And we implemented and assisted with many special events such as Kids Zombie Fun Run, [00:06:20] National Kids to Parks Day, Teen Laser Tag, the 9-11 Memorial Program, [00:06:27] Scare Trails, and the Children's Winter Art Show, to name a few. [00:06:33] Thank you. [00:06:37] Hello. [00:06:38] I am Alex Caravona. [00:06:39] The mission of the Youth Advisory Board is to educate and empower youth, [00:06:43] to develop roles and community leadership, [00:06:45] and help guide young people to becoming responsible adults and have pride [00:06:52] and respect for themselves, their families, and the city. [00:06:55] Thank you. [00:06:59] Good evening. [00:07:00] My name is Faith Sanchez. [00:07:02] And this is accomplished through each board member learning life skills, how to tie a tie, proper dress, [00:07:08] public speaking, resume development, and mock interviews, good handshakes with proper eye contact, [00:07:15] cooking, table setting, and table manners, how to speak to adults, and customer service skills. [00:07:20] Thank you. [00:07:24] Good evening. [00:07:25] I'm Bertel Butler. [00:07:26] I'd like to conclude in saying we, the members of the New Port Richey Parks [00:07:30] and Recreation Department Youth Advisory Board, are proud of our city, [00:07:34] our Parks and Recreation Department, and the role we play in the success of both. [00:07:40] We travel on the 18th of July to our state capital to represent our city in Tallahassee, [00:07:46] and we look forward to expanding our knowledge on how the state government works. [00:07:50] Thank you for the opportunity to serve our city and to be a member of the Youth Advisory Board. [00:08:00] Good evening. [00:08:01] My name is Kayla Mulcahy, and thank you for letting us tell you guys about our annual report. [00:08:09] Does anyone have any questions? [00:08:13] Just a comment. [00:08:15] I want to tell you every one of you did a very, very fine job speaking here tonight [00:08:19] because public speaking is very difficult for a lot of people, and you all did a great job. [00:08:23] Thank you. [00:08:31] On the table manners one, did you ever remember? [00:08:34] I remember at my home there were seven children at the dinner table, [00:08:38] and it was always Peter, Peter, strong and able, get your elbows off the table. [00:08:44] That's the one I remember. [00:08:46] I don't think it set in too good, but it's interesting to see how many life skills [00:08:51] and just how well you all represent the youth of our city. [00:08:55] Thank you. [00:08:56] Thank you. [00:08:57] Thank you. [00:08:58] Thank you. [00:08:59] I'd like you to take the time, too, and tell your friends what you're doing, [00:09:03] and even some of the people you just meet, you know, other youth. [00:09:06] So as you guys grow older, and they'll take your spots from the younger people, [00:09:10] because I always said that 10% of the people do 90% of the work. [00:09:15] So you guys are part of the 10%. [00:09:17] Get your friends part of it, and we'll grow it to 20% or 30%. [00:09:21] Thank you. [00:09:22] Thank you. [00:09:27] Thanks.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 9
Audit Presentation by Clifton Larson Allen, LLP
discussedClifton Larson Allen, LLP presented the results of the City's annual audit for fiscal year ended September 30, 2018. The City received a clean (unmodified) audit opinion and the CAFR was filed on time before the June 30 deadline; two internal control findings remained (timeliness of closing and prior period adjustments) while four prior findings were cleared. The presentation was informational with discussion of OPEB liabilities, a subsequent water/sewer revenue bond, and CRA audit requirements.
Clifton Larson Allen, LLPAndrew LaughlinBrandon ChambersCrystal DunnCrystal FeastDanny SpringfelsDebbieKim HilbergKim PavlatLance SchmidtNathan MannScott JonesUllmanCommunity Redevelopment Agency (CRA) audit requirementsComprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)Florida Public Depository RuleGASB 75Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB)Water and Sewer Revenue Bond (May 1, 2019, ~$8.7M, 10-year term, 2.61% interest)Yellow Book / Governmental Audit Standards▶ Jump to 9:32 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:09:32] Next is the annual presentation on the audit. [00:09:36] Yes, sir, Mr. Mayor. [00:09:37] I have with us this evening our associates from Clifton, Larson, and Allen. [00:09:44] We have Andrew Laughlin, Lance Schmidt, Kim Pavlat is sitting down, [00:09:52] and Crystal Dunn, and they, along with Crystal Feast, were our audit team this year. [00:09:58] Unfortunately, Ms. Feast is tending to a family medical emergency [00:10:03] and can't be here this evening. [00:10:06] But Mr. Laughlin and Mr. Schmidt have prepared a PowerPoint presentation for you on the audit. [00:10:16] Good evening, council members. [00:10:17] As Debbie mentioned, my name is Andrew Laughlin, principal of CLA. [00:10:20] A lot of familiar faces among you have seen you all in years past as we've presented the audit results, [00:10:25] so we're going to do the same thing here. [00:10:27] And as Debbie mentioned, we'll run through some PowerPoint slides [00:10:31] to give some highlights of the results of the audit. [00:10:34] The audit is complete. [00:10:35] CAFR, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, has been issued, [00:10:39] satisfied the state regulatory deadline of June 30, so got that out before that deadline. [00:10:44] So this is informative in nature to give you an idea of understanding of some of the information [00:10:50] that's contained within the CAFR. [00:10:52] First thing I want to do is just kind of introduce the team. [00:10:54] In years past, it's been a lot smaller team. [00:10:57] As you can see, we've got a lot of team members on the board this year. [00:11:00] A lot of that was due to just a quick turnaround that was necessary. [00:11:03] From the time that the books were closed and the information was ready to audit [00:11:08] to the time that we had that issuance deadline or goal of end of June. [00:11:13] So we brought a lot of additional players on board. [00:11:16] And part of my role also moved a bit within the city, [00:11:21] taking on more of a consultative capacity with the city [00:11:24] and helping the finance group on a project basis and any needs that they have. [00:11:29] So I've kind of moved into more of that consultative capacity [00:11:33] and then brought on Lance Schmidt, who's with me today, [00:11:36] to take on more of the day-to-day blocking and tackling duties of being the audit principal. [00:11:41] So it was a good tandem for us both to help make sure that we delivered a quality product on time. [00:11:46] And in addition to that, we brought a lot of additional team members under us. [00:11:50] So at the director level was Danny Springfels. [00:11:53] Kim has been with us for a number of years at the senior level working on the audit as the in-charge. [00:11:59] Brought in another senior with Nathan Mann and then a couple associates, [00:12:03] Scott Jones and Brandon Chambers, to get all that work done in that condensed time frame. [00:12:07] We also have a second partner review process. [00:12:10] That was Kim Hilberg. [00:12:11] That's standard throughout all of our local government jobs. [00:12:14] It goes into a pool and a GASB-dedicated second partner reviewer pulls it to do the review at the end of the engagement. [00:12:22] So a much larger team in years past, [00:12:24] but it paid off because we were able to get the CAF issued before that June 30 deadline. [00:12:30] So I'm going to turn it over to Lance to talk a little bit more about some of the services that we provided [00:12:35] and some of the results. [00:12:39] Thank you, Andrew. [00:12:40] And, again, it's a pleasure to be here. [00:12:41] Just for the record, my name is Lance Schmidt, [00:12:43] and I did serve as the audit principal for your audit for the year ended September 30, 2018. [00:12:48] And so I want to recap exactly kind of what you've hired us to do. [00:12:52] As you know, we're here to do an audit. [00:12:54] But when we say audit, you know, what does that mean? [00:12:56] What are we actually looking at? [00:12:58] And so I just want to recap exactly what that means and the scope as well. [00:13:02] Again, we're looking at the year ended September 30, 2018. [00:13:07] We did not audit the fire and police pension plans. [00:13:11] Those were audited by other auditors but included in the CAFR for the city. [00:13:18] So I wanted to make that point as well. [00:13:20] And then, lastly, we did have an emphasis of matter paragraph. [00:13:23] Anytime there's a big change in an accounting standard or related to an entity, [00:13:29] we're required to put that into our audit report. [00:13:32] We'll talk a little bit more about what that change was and what the impact was for the city, [00:13:36] and that had to do with the adoption of GASB 75 related to other post-employment benefits. [00:13:42] In addition to what you think of when we talk about the financial statement audit, [00:13:46] we also do an examination. [00:13:47] And so for that examination, we're actually looking at the investment and use of public funds, [00:13:53] basically making sure you've got them in a qualified public depository. [00:13:57] And so kind of a simple procedure, [00:13:59] but something that the state of Florida came out with a few years ago that they wanted us to actually opine on. [00:14:03] So we have the audit. [00:14:04] We have the examination procedures. [00:14:07] And then we have some other services that we also provide. [00:14:09] So in addition to doing the audit, [00:14:11] we also assisted with preparing the CAFR that you should have received by now. [00:14:17] And then we also provided some other project level kind of project management over some, [00:14:23] working with various accounting and financial matters. [00:14:27] So, again, just providing some additional consulting services to the city. [00:14:32] And that was really headed up by Andrew. [00:14:36] And so with that, I want to tell you the results of our audit. [00:14:39] The very first thing that we issue as part of our audit is what we call our independent auditor's report. [00:14:45] And that has to do with the financial statements. [00:14:48] Glad to report today you actually received a clean audit report on the financial statements. [00:14:53] You received an unmodified opinion. [00:14:55] What that means is that we were able to say you materially comply with. [00:15:00] GAAP accounting standards and we didn't have to say except for. Since we didn't [00:15:04] have to have an exception to it, that's hence the term unmodified. So you just [00:15:08] had a standard clean audit report. I think what's probably most important and [00:15:12] maybe also top of mind for the council is the fact that the audit was filed on [00:15:18] time this year. That was due June 30th. I'm glad to report that was filed on [00:15:23] time. So again, very good news there as well. In addition to that, we also [00:15:30] perform our audit in accordance with Yellow Book or governmental audit [00:15:34] standards. And so as part of that, what we're required to do is issue a report [00:15:39] on any internal control weaknesses we see as it relates to preparing the [00:15:45] financial statements that we issue an opinion on. And so as we looked at that, [00:15:49] we had two findings this year, two reports. The first one had to do with [00:15:54] timeliness of closing. You had that comment last year as well. What that [00:15:59] comment relates to is really just, you know, how quickly the city is able to [00:16:02] close everything out. So in years past, the audit was, you know, wasn't filed on [00:16:06] time last year or two, but I'm glad to report it was filed this year. We still [00:16:11] have it on there. A huge improvement over the prior year, but, you know, we did [00:16:16] start a little bit late and typically we, you know, we brought, as Andrew [00:16:19] mentioned, we brought in several additional team members to kind of make [00:16:21] that happen and make sure we delivered on time on our end, but did, you know, [00:16:26] obviously room for improvement in that area. And then secondly, anytime that we [00:16:31] have a prior period adjustment, a prior period adjustment basically means a [00:16:34] correction that was either missed in the prior year or wasn't in the prior year [00:16:38] financial statements, we're required to report that. This year we did have three [00:16:41] prior period adjustments. All of those are in the financial statements and [00:16:45] footnote you can see. Just add a little context to what does that mean and what [00:16:50] was the impact, what are we talking about with this prior period adjustments that [00:16:54] we had. All three of them really related to timing on when transactions were [00:16:59] recorded, so whether or not they were picked up last year versus this year or [00:17:02] this year versus last year. And so there wasn't transactions that were just [00:17:07] missing entirely, it was more of a timing between which year it should have been [00:17:11] recorded in. And so we did, you know, have that comment as well. And then lastly I [00:17:19] mentioned that we do an examination of your compliance with your investment of [00:17:24] public funds. We had an unmodified opinion on your compliance with the [00:17:29] Florida Public Depository Rule, so again another clean opinion there. And so with [00:17:34] that, it might be difficult to see on the screen, but I'm going to turn over to [00:17:38] Andrew. He's going to recap kind of the status of the prior year findings we had [00:17:42] in our prior audit, which of those have rolled off and which are still [00:17:45] outstanding. Sure, thanks Lance. So one of our audit responsibilities as required by [00:17:50] the Florida Auditor General is to evaluate the current status of any [00:17:55] prior year findings from previous audit reports. So we incorporate this [00:18:01] schedule right in the management letter at the end of the CAFR. So I won't [00:18:05] belabor the first two. Lance has already talked about that those were [00:18:08] repeat findings and things that we noted in the internal control report. The next [00:18:14] one was the preparation review of cash reconciliations. Big improvement from [00:18:18] years past. The city and finance group is catching up, but there still were some [00:18:23] delays that kind of caused the audit timing to shift back a bit. So better [00:18:29] than before, we can get it even better going forward. And then there's the [00:18:33] remaining four that we had that were listed last year. Those have all been [00:18:36] entirely cleared. So one on investment policy compliance. In particular, there's [00:18:40] some issues in years past about allowable allocations among investment [00:18:45] classes, as well as some reporting requirements. Those have all been [00:18:49] relieved. Some utility billing rates. The city adjusts its [00:18:55] rates annually as part of each city ordinance. So we've noticed some [00:18:59] issues in the past with some miscalculations in the input of new [00:19:04] rates. Didn't see any repeat instances of that through our testing this year. [00:19:07] Analysis of uncollectible accounts. Management should have a methodology in [00:19:15] place in order to evaluate potential uncollectible, those utility billing or [00:19:19] other outstanding account balances. So in past we've seen that account balance [00:19:25] stagnant from year after year. This year, management got a better hold of that and [00:19:30] did a more comprehensive analysis of what that estimate should be at 930-18. [00:19:35] So that we called cleared. And then last one just on inventory procedures and [00:19:39] some past observations at year-end. The inventorying procedures had some [00:19:44] issues with some counts and then reconciling that to what's recorded in [00:19:48] the general ledger and the inventory balances. Didn't have any repeat of that [00:19:53] this year, so we called that one clear as well. So that's certainly steps in the [00:19:57] right direction, not having repeat findings in those last four. I'll turn it [00:20:04] back over to Lance to talk about some required governance communications. [00:20:08] Thank you, Andrew. As part of the audit, there are certain communication we're [00:20:12] required to have with you as governance. And so you should have a letter in your [00:20:16] packet that kind of covers all that and what I like to say the under bridge [00:20:20] version. I want to recap that letter in just a few points. The first item is if we [00:20:25] had any difficulties, significant difficulties encountered during our audit, [00:20:29] we would be required to communicate those to you. Like I said, we did have a [00:20:33] finding kind of related to the timeliness. The good news is even though [00:20:37] we've got things a little bit later than we would have hoped, we were able to [00:20:39] deliver the audit on time. So again, really no significant difficulties that [00:20:44] really affected our audit whatsoever. Any corrected or uncorrected misstatements [00:20:50] that we like to call these audit adjustments or anything, you know, smaller [00:20:53] immaterial that we see that doesn't need to be recorded just due to the [00:20:55] immaterial nature, that's also recorded or disclosed in the back of that letter. [00:21:00] So you have that as well. If there were any disagreements with management, we'd [00:21:05] be required to communicate those. And so what we're really talking about here is [00:21:08] generally accounting type matters that maybe, you know, we suggested it should be [00:21:12] recorded this way and management feels differently. We'd be required to disclose [00:21:17] that to you. As part of our audit, we do receive a management representation [00:21:21] letter. So management has signed off on these financial statements as being true [00:21:25] and accurate. So we do receive that as part of our engagement, as part of our [00:21:30] audit. Everything in there with our letterhead on it is ours and everything [00:21:34] else is really the the product of the cities. We did assist with that, but [00:21:38] management takes full responsibility for that. And then if there were any, you know, [00:21:43] consultations with other auditors, we kind of think of this as a second [00:21:46] opinion that you would see in the medical field. If management felt they [00:21:50] needed to consult with another CPA firm on a matter, that CPA firm is required to [00:21:53] get with us first, make sure they have all the facts. To our knowledge, there [00:21:57] were no second or other consultations with other auditors as it related to any [00:22:02] accounting matters. And as part of some of the qualitative aspects of the [00:22:06] accounting practices, what I want to do on this next slide is just kind of [00:22:09] highlight, you know, you've got a large CAFR in front of you, a lot of pages. I [00:22:13] know you guys can't wait to jump into that and read every word and I'll [00:22:16] probably get a lot of questions from you guys when I'm done. However, I do want to [00:22:20] highlight some things you're saying, what do I need to really focus on? What's [00:22:23] of value here? Two footnotes I'd like to highlight. Footnote I and P relates to [00:22:30] other post-employment benefits. So those are basically health care benefits to [00:22:34] retired employees of the city. Accounting standards require that not only do you [00:22:40] account for the actual retirees that you have, but if you have a, well just as an [00:22:44] example, if you have an 18 year old that starts with the city tomorrow, we [00:22:48] actually project kind of the probability that that 18 year old will continue his [00:22:53] entire career here, qualify for those other post-employment benefits. And what [00:22:57] do we think the health care costs are going to be whenever that young lady or [00:23:01] man retires in 40 plus years? All of that goes into the calculation and of course [00:23:06] that gets discounted back as well. All that goes into the calculation of OPEB. [00:23:09] And so when I share that you may say, what what did you just explain to me? [00:23:13] What I'm basically saying is there's a lot of assumptions and a lot of [00:23:17] estimates that goes into OPEB. So it's not a simple, you know, this is what we're [00:23:21] going to have to pay out so we record this liability on the books. This [00:23:26] liability is several millions of dollars. It's a lot of estimates. It will change [00:23:30] over time. It'll change as your policies change, as assumptions change, as health [00:23:35] care rates change. So in footnote, I related to OPEB. You'll see, you know, [00:23:41] this is a big estimate. What happens if we're off by 1% either way? And you can [00:23:45] actually go and see, you know, what that impact would be to the city. So I want to [00:23:50] make that clear because it is a big liability and that's recorded on your [00:23:53] books. However, it's not something that you can just, you know, go out and pay [00:23:56] today. It's a long-term 30-40 year liability that has a lot of estimates [00:24:01] built into it. And so in addition to that, obviously we're delivering the [00:24:06] audit in July for the year ended September 30, 2018. And so I did want to [00:24:11] highlight the one subsequent event that we have disclosed. So subsequent event is [00:24:15] anything major that happened after you're in that kind of rises to the [00:24:18] level of disclosure. You did receive a new water and sewer revenue bond on May [00:24:25] 1st, 2019. Approximately $8.7 million with the following terms of repayment of [00:24:31] 10 years and interest rate of 2.61. So again, something a little more recent to [00:24:36] financials that we always like to highlight. And then lastly, again, and [00:24:41] there's a lot of information there. You may say, you know, if I'm going to, you [00:24:45] know, if I'm going to start somewhere, where's a good place to go? I always [00:24:48] recommend you go to the management discussion and analysis. That's going to [00:24:51] talk about some of the economic factors affecting the city. It's also going to [00:24:54] show you current year and prior year numbers so you can see kind of those [00:24:57] changes year over year. And then lastly, there is a statistical section as well [00:25:02] that has some accounting and non-accounting data. So you've got some [00:25:06] 10-year schedules that you can take a look at and some other information like [00:25:10] top taxpayers, you know, top revenue sources, etc. So again, very good [00:25:16] information there. And so again, I did just want to reiterate, you know, it's a [00:25:22] pleasure to work with City of New Port Richey. This getting an audit done, [00:25:27] it's not something that we can just do unilaterally. It's not, we don't come in [00:25:32] here with guns and badges and demand documents and then issue an audit report. [00:25:35] It takes a lot of work on both sides to have an audit go smoothly and to issue [00:25:41] on time. So again, I want to say thank you to your city manager and also the [00:25:47] finance department, both Crystal and Crystal Feast who couldn't be here [00:25:50] tonight, to say thank you for their assistance and also our team as well [00:25:54] because it's a lot more than just Andrew and I that made this happen. So with that, [00:26:01] I know I just threw a lot of information at you, but I'd be glad to entertain any [00:26:05] questions you guys may have. [00:26:10] One thing we've been, over the past few years, debating on this timeliness, what [00:26:18] would be a number that you would like to see us be prepared a month earlier, a [00:26:23] couple weeks earlier? Well, first of all, let me say your team and our team, I'm [00:26:28] glad to see you're both in the same dugout. You know, that makes it work a [00:26:33] lot better, I think. So, but anyhow, what would you need from us, you know? [00:26:38] Yeah, certainly. Appreciate that comment. Yeah, so we received, kind of got the [00:26:43] final numbers this year, kind of mid-May. So it gave us about six weeks to kind of [00:26:46] turn it around and including preparing the CAFR that you saw. So there were [00:26:50] quite a few hours that went into that short period. You know, we don't really [00:26:55] have a set time per se, but yes, a few, you know, a month earlier, several weeks [00:26:59] earlier would be great. Yeah. And the other thing, you said that, if you go [00:27:05] back a couple, you called it other post-employment benefits. Yes. Is that, is [00:27:10] that, does that change, I mean, monthly or, you know, because, you know, you've got [00:27:17] turnover employees, you can say, that kid at 18, what's his chances of being here [00:27:21] in 40 years, number one? You know, so doesn't that change every year when you [00:27:24] take a look, or do you take a look at the employment and where, how long [00:27:29] they've been around and whether their retirement's coming up and things like [00:27:33] that? Does that all go into this number? It is, yeah. And that's, a lot of that [00:27:37] information is aggregated, kind of in buckets. The actuaries really do this [00:27:41] work, and so they, you know, they've kind of got built-in assumptions and models [00:27:46] that are, you know, industry practice, industry standard. Every year, or every [00:27:51] two years, so you're only required to do it every two years, you have a new [00:27:54] valuation study where they basically take all your census data and then they [00:27:57] reproject. That's a great term, census status, you know, that, okay, all right, I [00:28:02] just, it just seems to me you picked out this one kid at 18, and I was like, man, [00:28:06] we got a lot of people that are 18 working for us, and it's been a lot of years. [00:28:09] And so someone who has, you know, 30 years experience, that's one year away [00:28:12] from retirement, obviously that's gonna more heavily weight the liability than [00:28:16] say, a brand new person to start. So, but yeah, it's, the real big key takeaway is [00:28:22] there's just a lot of estimates and far, you know, far-looking estimates that go [00:28:29] into that, and so I like to share that just so that people don't maybe look at [00:28:34] that liability and say, well, that's not something we can afford. You know, your [00:28:37] approximate, approximate payout is about $85,000 a year. Your liability is, yeah, [00:28:45] just looking at close to $4 million. And so when you look at the liability, you're [00:28:49] only paying out $85,000 a year, not $4 million at one time. [00:28:52] All right, thank you. Mr. Ullman? Just maybe a topical comment related to the new [00:29:01] statutes looking forward for what really won't be a change, I don't think, [00:29:06] but the requirement for CRAs to have audits. I know there are a lot of CRAs in [00:29:11] Florida that are not comprised of the five members of the Council of the [00:29:17] cities. The effort that you place and put into the CRA aspect of the [00:29:26] financial statements, is that a definable effort? Is that, going to a [00:29:32] comment, a discussion we had in our work session earlier, is it a billable part of [00:29:37] the audit? And how closely do you look at the CRA requirements? We had some [00:29:43] discussion about what was appropriate, and I think the new law is looking to [00:29:46] the CPA profession to make those determinations. Are you familiar with [00:29:54] what's happened with respect to them? How do you perceive our CRA and... [00:30:00] Any comments related to that? [00:30:02] Sure, yeah, I can definitely speak [00:30:03] to kind of the work that we do. [00:30:04] So as part of the CRA, we do look at that [00:30:07] at its own, what we call opinion level unit, [00:30:11] meaning that we don't look at the entire city [00:30:13] and say, okay, well, the city's got tens of millions [00:30:16] of dollars, so we don't care about 20 or 30,000 [00:30:19] over at the CRA, it doesn't work that way. [00:30:21] We look at that as kind of standalone. [00:30:24] And then we do some additional expenditure testing [00:30:27] specifically related to the CRA to make sure [00:30:30] that the expenses coming out of there are allowable. [00:30:32] We also look at increases in the property values [00:30:37] related to the CRA, that's another specific test [00:30:40] that we do. [00:30:41] So there is a lot of, I know historically, [00:30:45] the work that we've done by having that [00:30:47] as what we call a major fund, and then doing [00:30:50] that additional compliance testing [00:30:52] and looking at the expenditures has met the standards [00:30:55] and so, or met the requirements for the state of Florida. [00:30:58] And so it's definitely something we'll be looking [00:31:01] at going forward to make sure that still works. [00:31:04] But as of historically, that's been enough [00:31:08] to satisfy the auditor, state auditor general, so. [00:31:11] Good, just to stay on that topic again, [00:31:13] I think it was years ago when I was involved [00:31:15] in a previous firm was auditing two things. [00:31:19] One, we had to hire the previous auditor [00:31:22] to prepare the financial statements [00:31:24] because it was the city's responsibility [00:31:27] to prepare the financial statements [00:31:29] and we were at the beginning of the Sun Guard transition [00:31:33] and the city had never prepared financial statements. [00:31:36] They were always assisted by the auditor [00:31:38] as part of the audit fee. [00:31:39] So when we got the new auditor, that was it, [00:31:42] we were informed we had to have financials. [00:31:47] I see that you're helping to prepare them. [00:31:49] So I'm guessing that when the Tyler Technologies [00:31:53] comes forward, there'll be a CAFRA, [00:31:56] an opportunity for the city to prepare many of these, [00:31:59] especially the city-wide financial, the accrued ones, [00:32:05] or some of the more complex transactions [00:32:11] that have to be made to show [00:32:12] the two types of financial reports. [00:32:17] But the other thing that happened was [00:32:19] the city had demolished the church, [00:32:24] which is now under construction privately [00:32:27] as a redevelopment project. [00:32:28] And in the post-demolition, there was just vacant land [00:32:33] and the property was still on our books [00:32:34] at several million dollars. [00:32:38] That is treated differently because it's inventory [00:32:42] versus land, which is left at its value [00:32:44] until it's sold, generally speaking. [00:32:46] So it was a substantial debate over all of that [00:32:49] that resulted in a loss to the CRA [00:32:52] because it had to write down the demolition of the church. [00:32:55] And ultimately it was been sold for much less [00:32:57] than the city purchased it for. [00:32:59] Probably a good long-term redevelopment investment, [00:33:02] but it doesn't look real good on financial statements. [00:33:04] And so sometimes there's more concern [00:33:07] about the way a financial statement looks. [00:33:10] And so it's important, I think, to us [00:33:12] because we are city-wide. [00:33:14] We aren't just a $23,000 CRA. [00:33:16] We're a city-wide CRA with $3.some million budget. [00:33:21] And as has been mentioned, there's been a lot of attention [00:33:25] to CRAs to make sure that they're functioning properly. [00:33:28] So I would be interested to learn more from you all [00:33:33] as time goes about your support for the manner [00:33:39] in which the city is implementing its redevelopment plan [00:33:45] or any issues that you might have that would cause you [00:33:48] not to defend us to the Auditor General. [00:33:51] Gotcha. [00:33:52] Yeah, no, certainly. [00:33:53] We'd be definitely look at ourselves [00:33:55] as trying to add that level of value [00:33:57] to make sure you're staying compliant [00:33:59] with the various rules and regulations [00:34:01] and doing anything we can to help. [00:34:02] So certainly. [00:34:04] You're good. [00:34:04] Councilman Murphy? [00:34:05] No, I'm good. [00:34:07] Thank you very much for your efforts [00:34:09] to get it done promptly. [00:34:10] I'm sure that our staff will endeavor to get you [00:34:13] the materials that you need a little bit faster [00:34:17] this coming year. [00:34:19] And God willing, Tyler will be a completed project. [00:34:24] That's been, for those of you who aren't aware, [00:34:26] a multi-year project now that has played absolute havoc [00:34:30] on the accounting system. [00:34:33] But it is mercifully drawing to a close. [00:34:36] So that's good. [00:34:38] Thank you all. [00:34:39] Thank you.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 10Vox Pop for Items Not Listed on the Agenda or Listed on Consent Agenda▶ 34:40
- 11.a
Cultural Affairs Committee Minutes - May 2019
approvedon consentThe Cultural Affairs Committee minutes from May 2019 were approved by voice vote.
- motion:Motion to approve the Cultural Affairs Committee Minutes from May 2019. (passed)
▶ Jump to 41:26 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:27] Second. [00:41:29] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:41:31] Aye. [00:41:32] Opposed, like sign. [00:41:35] Motion passes. [00:41:36] Next is first reading ordinance 2019-2164.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 11.b
Environmental Committee Minutes - January through May 2019
approvedon consentCouncil accepted the Environmental Committee Minutes for January through May 2019 by voice vote.
- vote:Accept the Environmental Committee Minutes for January through May 2019. (passed)
▶ Jump to 41:26 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:27] Second. [00:41:29] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:41:31] Aye. [00:41:32] Opposed, like sign. [00:41:35] Motion passes. [00:41:36] Next is first reading ordinance 2019-2164.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 11.c
Land Development Review Board Minutes - May 2019
approvedon consentCouncil acknowledged the Land Development Review Board Minutes from May 2019 as part of the consent or administrative agenda; the motion passed by voice vote.
- motion:Motion to accept the Land Development Review Board Minutes for May 2019. (passed)
▶ Jump to 41:26 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:27] Second. [00:41:29] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:41:31] Aye. [00:41:32] Opposed, like sign. [00:41:35] Motion passes. [00:41:36] Next is first reading ordinance 2019-2164.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 11.d
Library Advisory Board Minutes - March and April 2019
approvedon consentLibrary Advisory Board minutes for March and April 2019 were accepted as part of the consent or routine approval, passing on a voice vote.
- vote:Approve/accept the Library Advisory Board minutes for March and April 2019. (passed)
▶ Jump to 41:26 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:27] Second. [00:41:29] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:41:31] Aye. [00:41:32] Opposed, like sign. [00:41:35] Motion passes. [00:41:36] Next is first reading ordinance 2019-2164.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 11.e
Purchase/Payments for City Council Approval
approvedon consentCouncil approved the purchase/payments item by voice vote.
- vote:Motion to approve purchase/payments for City Council approval. (passed)
▶ Jump to 41:26 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:27] Second. [00:41:29] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:41:31] Aye. [00:41:32] Opposed, like sign. [00:41:35] Motion passes. [00:41:36] Next is first reading ordinance 2019-2164.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 12.a
First Reading, Ordinance 2019-2164: Ordinance Pertaining to Off-Street Parking Spaces
tabledCouncil considered first reading of Ordinance 2019-2164, which would amend the Land Development Code to reclassify crushed stone, crushed rock, gravel, and shell as pervious surfaces for off-street parking. The Land Development Review Board had recommended against the change. Council voted to table the item pending input from the Environmental Committee.
Ord. Ordinance 2019-2164
- motion:Motion to table Ordinance 2019-2164 pending a report back from the Environmental Committee. (passed)
6119 Illinois Ave.Better MixEnvironmental CommitteeLand Development Review BoardFrank StarkeyMarilyn DeschantMr. RomanoliMs. MadsOrdinance 2019-2164Section 11.05.00 of Chapter 11, Land Development Codeoff-street parking spacespervious vs impervious surfaces▶ Jump to 41:37 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:41:40] Ordinance number 2019-2164, [00:41:43] an ordinance in the city of New Port Richey, Florida [00:41:45] providing for amendment of section 11.05.00 [00:41:48] of chapter 11 of the New Port Richey Land Development Code [00:41:51] pertaining to off-street parking spaces, [00:41:53] providing for complex severability and effective date. [00:41:57] Ms. Mads. [00:41:58] Yes, sir. [00:41:59] Mr. Mayor. [00:42:01] This agenda item is being presented to you [00:42:05] as a follow-up to the discussion [00:42:07] that occurred at your last meeting [00:42:10] in respect to pervious and impervious surfaces. [00:42:15] Impervious surfaces are those that do not allow drainage [00:42:21] and pervious surfaces currently [00:42:25] in our zoning code, pardon me, [00:42:31] are defined as mulch. [00:42:33] And it is the only material currently defined as pervious. [00:42:39] This request is presented as a result of a citizen comment [00:42:46] that was made at a meeting several months ago [00:42:50] at which time he was requesting [00:42:52] that materials be reclassified as pervious. [00:42:59] The materials were crushed stone, crushed rock, [00:43:03] gravel, and shell. [00:43:06] And the matter was considered [00:43:08] by the Land Development Review Board. [00:43:10] It was their thinking that a change in the definition [00:43:15] was not something that they were comfortable [00:43:18] recommending to you for your consideration. [00:43:22] Unfortunately, though, at your last meeting, [00:43:24] we did not provide you with a copy of the minutes [00:43:27] from the Land Development Review Board meeting, [00:43:29] and you requested that information. [00:43:32] Therefore, they are attached to your agenda item, [00:43:36] and Mr. Romanoli and I are prepared to respond [00:43:39] to any questions that you may have of us. [00:43:42] Thank you. [00:43:42] We'll open it up for public comment. [00:43:45] Please come on down. [00:43:51] Thank you. [00:43:55] Marilyn Deschant, 6119 Illinois Ave. [00:44:00] If I'm correct, didn't you all discuss this matter [00:44:02] at the work session last week? [00:44:05] No. [00:44:06] Oh, a week ago, okay. [00:44:07] This is the accessory parking, correct? [00:44:10] Is this, okay. [00:44:12] So, if my memory serves, [00:44:16] I thought that one of the council persons, [00:44:19] or more than one, wanted to have [00:44:21] the Environmental Committee brought into that matter [00:44:24] and talk about the efficacy of pervious impervious. [00:44:31] I mean, we're looking at a first reading here, [00:44:33] so I'm kind of, I mean, I just stay up to date with stuff. [00:44:38] So, I mean, are they going to be brought in on this [00:44:44] with their comments, or? [00:44:47] Do you have any? [00:44:49] Mr. Mayor, I am recalling that as part of the discussion, [00:44:53] and I have not asked the Environmental Committee [00:44:56] for any input into this matter at this time. [00:44:59] If it's your direction. [00:45:00] that I do so, then certainly that will be the case. [00:45:05] If you, I'm not on that committee. [00:45:06] My husband, however, is the environmental committee chair. [00:45:11] So I kind of stay up to date with all this. [00:45:12] And it just does seem to me that this could be [00:45:15] an important item for discussion or consideration [00:45:19] because impervious is probably not as good as pervious [00:45:25] so that the water can go back down into the soil. [00:45:31] It's just my comment on that. [00:45:34] All right. [00:45:35] Thank you very much. [00:45:36] Thank you. [00:45:37] Anyone else? [00:45:40] Seeing no one else come forward, [00:45:41] I'm going to bring it back to council. [00:45:43] What's your pleasure? [00:45:45] I'd just like to say that if environmentally conscious, [00:45:50] if you can use Shell, which I believe you can, [00:45:53] but you need to get a permit that this issue [00:45:55] really was more about whether to buy, [00:45:57] have a permit and you have it than it was [00:45:59] about pervious or impervious. [00:46:01] I don't think that calling something impervious [00:46:06] is going to stop the water from slipping [00:46:07] between the cracks of the rocks. [00:46:10] And so to me, it's just impervious. [00:46:14] It means impervious. [00:46:15] So I'm having a little problem just approving something [00:46:18] because somebody doesn't see a reason to change. [00:46:23] The whole issue of getting a permit [00:46:25] but not having to pay for it, [00:46:26] but it's still an aggravation to get a permit. [00:46:29] Just as we heard before in the box pop conversation, [00:46:36] there's just a lot of noncompliance in our city. [00:46:39] It's up and down the streets. [00:46:40] The code enforcement tries everything they can. [00:46:43] Somebody gets picked as the person who gets that fine [00:46:47] and then that turns into a case [00:46:49] and only so many cases can happen. [00:46:52] I'm not so sure that we're ever going to check [00:46:59] every vehicle that stops and parks in somebody's lawn. [00:47:03] But we do have rules and I think they were brought up [00:47:07] in order to improve the look [00:47:08] and the curb appeal of our city. [00:47:15] So my biggest problem is just saying something [00:47:17] is something when it isn't. [00:47:18] So, I mean, that was my objection [00:47:23] as to the word impervious. [00:47:24] I learned after the fact that the real question [00:47:27] is whether a permit's required for that particular type [00:47:30] of an inexpensive way for somebody to create a parking spot [00:47:36] using a product that's not mulched. [00:47:42] It might float back out into the street. [00:47:43] I'm not so sure how desirable mulch is [00:47:46] versus gravel or shell either. [00:47:49] But I am a little concerned that when I read the minutes [00:47:54] of the Land Development Review Board, [00:47:56] there was quite a bit on that agenda. [00:47:58] I found myself unfortunately interested [00:48:01] in some of the other commentary related to land use [00:48:05] and I think some of the issues [00:48:06] that were in that particular meeting. [00:48:08] And my takeaway is that there are a lot [00:48:13] of public discussions going on in the city [00:48:15] about ways to better the city, [00:48:18] better drainage environmentally, also better look. [00:48:21] And I think members of the city council have attended [00:48:25] a lot of some of these programs [00:48:30] that Frank Starkey puts on in his place that are topical. [00:48:34] The missing middle, the different kind of housing, [00:48:37] the objectives of our potential changes to the density [00:48:43] and how we plan our city in the future. [00:48:47] And it has become clear to me that our committee [00:48:52] that has the power of recommendation, [00:48:55] so we could overcome the recommendation, [00:48:58] but I would like to make sure that this committee [00:49:00] gets the same kind of information that we get [00:49:04] about the things that we're trying to do in the city [00:49:06] because my interpretation of that meeting [00:49:09] was that it was some folks that have good points [00:49:14] and many of them in single family residential [00:49:16] a little farther from the downtown [00:49:21] that maybe haven't heard the same things we've heard [00:49:23] and then make a formal recommendation to us [00:49:26] without understanding the full impact. [00:49:32] So I don't know if I'm making sense [00:49:36] to the planning department because they're a part of, [00:49:40] you know, they support the planning department [00:49:43] and look at things, but I was a little disappointed [00:49:47] at the lack of progressive thinking [00:49:51] that could come from at least hearing the same things [00:49:55] that we're hearing for the decisions we're looking to make. [00:49:58] Bottom line to me is whatever will work to help [00:50:03] let folks to park respectfully on their property [00:50:07] without tearing it up, which is what's happening, [00:50:10] I'm in favor of. [00:50:13] I think this is a lot more blown up than the issue itself, [00:50:16] which is maybe a permit requirement issue [00:50:19] that I don't know what else to say, yeah. [00:50:23] Deputy Mayor. [00:50:24] Is the issue here, I'm not an engineer by any means, [00:50:27] but is the issue here whether or not rainwater [00:50:29] can get through rocks and crust shell? [00:50:31] That's what this is all about, correct? [00:50:33] Aside from having to pull a permit you don't have to pay for. [00:50:35] That was part of the concerns raised originally, yes. [00:50:43] It sounds like it'd be a great science project [00:50:47] for a middle schooler, I guess. [00:50:48] But honestly, like most could be impervious [00:50:53] if you put that black vinyl down [00:50:55] that people use for gardening. [00:50:57] So that could not let the water through as well. [00:50:59] I don't see how if rain, like we've had, [00:51:04] would not be able to penetrate [00:51:05] through crushed limestone or rocks, [00:51:08] unless you have a black vinyl underneath it. [00:51:10] That's my personal, just looking from the outside in, [00:51:13] opinion on this. [00:51:14] I think crushed shell looks good. [00:51:16] I've been to barrier islands [00:51:18] with beautiful multimillion dollar homes [00:51:20] that use crushed shell for their driveway. [00:51:22] I'm all in favor of that, rocks. [00:51:25] I'm not personally a big fan of mulch [00:51:26] because it floats away. [00:51:27] You call it impervious if you want, [00:51:30] but if we get a downpour it's gonna float away. [00:51:32] So it sounds to me like it's just redefining pervious. [00:51:37] And in my opinion, not being any kind of rock engineer, [00:51:40] but I would assume that rain can get through crushed stone, [00:51:43] crushed rock, gravel, and shell. [00:51:45] So if you want to define that as pervious, [00:51:47] and I'm all for allowing people [00:51:49] to make additional parking on their lawn [00:51:53] using these materials, [00:51:55] rather than calling Better Mix [00:51:56] or another concrete company to come in. [00:51:58] So I'm in favor of this. [00:52:00] I'm not sure why that. [00:52:02] Now if the environmental committee, [00:52:04] if we stated during the meeting [00:52:06] that you were gonna be involved with this discussion [00:52:08] and you weren't, [00:52:09] if council wants to let them discuss it [00:52:11] and maybe send a report to Ms. Manson to get to us Friday [00:52:14] and then we'll add this agenda item to the next meeting, [00:52:17] I'm okay with that [00:52:18] because if we said we're gonna include you [00:52:19] in the discussion and that committee is not included, [00:52:22] these people are volunteering their own time, [00:52:24] so it's kind of a slap in the face a little bit there. [00:52:26] So it was just an oversight. [00:52:27] So if my colleagues are okay, [00:52:30] if we want to table this, [00:52:31] let the environmental committee take a look at it, [00:52:33] give us their input. [00:52:35] I'm okay with it, [00:52:35] but either way I'm fine calling that pervious [00:52:38] and allowing crushed shell and rock. [00:52:39] Is that a motion to table? [00:52:41] Motion to table. [00:52:42] And pending a report back from the environmental committee. [00:52:45] Second with comment. [00:52:47] Comment. [00:52:48] Am I just, you know, [00:52:49] if I dig four inches down and put four inches of rock [00:52:53] and four inches of shell, [00:52:55] water's not getting through that, [00:52:56] especially after I drive on it for a month, [00:52:58] you know, in the same spots. [00:53:00] You know, so there's a, [00:53:02] I saw a smile from out there with that, [00:53:05] you know, middle school project comment, [00:53:07] but you know, there's, you know, [00:53:10] maybe environmental people would know more about this [00:53:12] and so I'll. [00:53:13] Hopefully they'll come back with something for us. [00:53:16] We have a motion to table. [00:53:18] All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [00:53:20] Aye. [00:53:22] Opposed, blocks. [00:53:24] Motion, the ordinance table till pending review
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 13.a
Variance Application: 5911 Delaware Avenue
approvedCouncil considered a variance application for 5911 Delaware Avenue to allow a proposed garage to encroach 4 feet into the 25-foot side-street setback on Jefferson Street. Although staff recommended denial because the request did not meet the hardship tests, the LDRB had supported it, and council approved the variance, agreeing the narrow corner lot itself constitutes a hardship.
- motion:Motion to approve the variance request for a garage at 5911 Delaware Avenue encroaching 4 feet into the 25-foot Jefferson Street setback. (passed)
5911 Delaware AvenueMr. DavisMr. RomanelliMs. Mance25-foot corner-lot setbackDRC (Development Review Committee)LDRB (Land Development Review Board)R3 residential zoningquasi-judicial hearing▶ Jump to 53:28 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[00:53:28] from the environmental committee. [00:53:30] Next is a variance application, 5911 Delaware Avenue. [00:53:35] And in that regard, [00:53:36] Mr. Romanoli has prepared a presentation. [00:53:39] Thank you, Ms. Mance. [00:53:43] So this is coming to you, [00:53:44] mayor and councilman, [00:53:46] because there was a disagreement between the LDRB [00:53:49] and the DRC. [00:53:51] And when that happens, [00:53:52] it comes to the city council for final approval. [00:53:56] I believe the owners are here, right? [00:54:00] The owners are here? [00:54:01] No. [00:54:02] No, I do not believe the owners of property [00:54:04] are in attendance this evening. [00:54:06] And I'd like to remind the council [00:54:07] that it is a quasi judicial hearing. [00:54:11] So this property is at the corner of Delaware [00:54:13] and Jefferson Street. [00:54:14] And then there's a depiction of the property right there. [00:54:18] And this is what the property survey looks like [00:54:20] with the proposed garage that the owner would like to build. [00:54:24] The problem with this is the setback. [00:54:27] So on a corner lot, [00:54:29] the setbacks from the two streets are 25 feet. [00:54:33] The proposed garage will go four feet [00:54:35] into the 25 feet setback on Jefferson Street. [00:54:39] They are not fronting on Jefferson Street, [00:54:41] they're fronting on Delaware, [00:54:43] but it's a side street. [00:54:45] This shows where the garage would go on the property. [00:54:50] As you can see, the house is way back [00:54:52] very close to Delaware, [00:54:54] and it's on the back fronting Jefferson. [00:54:57] And another picture of the property. [00:55:02] So it is R3 residential, [00:55:03] and again, R3 residential. [00:55:05] The setbacks are 25 feet [00:55:07] for the two streets that abut the property, [00:55:09] and five feet from the side and other property line. [00:55:13] All the other setbacks are fine. [00:55:15] It is just a setback on Jefferson Street [00:55:17] that is the problem. [00:55:19] In order to consider a variance, [00:55:23] there has to be a hardship. [00:55:24] There's six tests, basically, [00:55:27] that define what a hardship is. [00:55:29] Whether there's special conditions or circumstances [00:55:31] that exist that are peculiar to the land structure [00:55:34] or building, which are not applicable to other lands, [00:55:37] structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. [00:55:39] I apologize for my voice, by the way, Councilman. [00:55:42] Sorry for that. [00:55:44] That the special conditions and circumstances [00:55:46] do not result from the actions of the applicant. [00:55:49] That granting the variance requested [00:55:50] will not confer on the applicant [00:55:52] any special privilege that is denied [00:55:54] by this ordinance to other lands, [00:55:56] buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. [00:55:59] That little interpretation of the provisions [00:56:01] of the ordinance would deprive the applicant [00:56:03] of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties [00:56:05] in the same zoning district [00:56:06] under the terms of the ordinance [00:56:08] would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the applicant. [00:56:12] That the variance granted is the minimum variance [00:56:14] that will make possible the reasonable use [00:56:16] of the land, building, or structure. [00:56:18] And that the grant or variance will be in harmony [00:56:20] with the general intent and purpose of the ordinance [00:56:22] and that such variance will be non-injurious [00:56:25] to the area involved or otherwise detrimental [00:56:28] to the public welfare. [00:56:30] We do not believe that this variance request [00:56:33] meet the hardship tests. [00:56:35] The property owner wanted a larger garage [00:56:38] because of the vehicles that they repair, [00:56:42] basically as a hobby. [00:56:44] But we do not think that it meets the hardship tests. [00:56:47] So we recommend disapproval of the variance request. [00:56:54] Ask the city attorney to reiterate [00:56:58] what it means for this to be a quasi-judicial. [00:57:02] If you've had any ex-party communications [00:57:04] with anyone regarding this, [00:57:05] this would be the time to disclose that. [00:57:07] You also need to make your determination [00:57:09] based on the evidence that's presented before you tonight. [00:57:13] Do we have any ex-party communications? [00:57:15] No, sir. [00:57:18] And again, the, I'm sorry, Mr. Mayor, [00:57:19] the LDRB disagreed with staff and felt this, [00:57:24] it was a hardship and they granted the variance. [00:57:26] Very good. [00:57:27] Do we have any, you said the applicant is not in attendance? [00:57:31] No. [00:57:32] Do we have any substantially affected parties, [00:57:34] nearby neighbors? [00:57:38] Anyone else? [00:57:42] Seeing no one else come forward, [00:57:44] we will bring this back to council. [00:57:49] Let me kick this off. [00:57:50] I have a real hard time visualizing things. [00:57:56] So I actually drove out there to take an eyeball at it. [00:58:02] And [00:58:08] in my personal opinion, [00:58:09] I cannot wait until we get a zoning code change [00:58:13] to change that 25 foot setback. [00:58:15] It is just really, [00:58:19] I think it does create almost by definition a hardship. [00:58:21] If you've got a 50 foot wide lot [00:58:24] and you've got to have a 25 foot setback on one side [00:58:26] and a 20 foot setback or a five foot setback on the other, [00:58:30] that's 30 feet out of the 50 [00:58:31] that's taken out of that lot right by it. [00:58:36] And that was one of the comments in the LPRB [00:58:39] that a couple of the people said [00:58:41] that the lot itself is the hardship. [00:58:46] And I'm inclined to agree with them. [00:58:49] Mayor, I like your logic. [00:58:51] I'll make a motion to accept the variance request. [00:58:56] Let me, I appreciate that. [00:59:00] Let me point at one other thing. [00:59:03] The catty corner to this lot on the alley side, [00:59:11] there is a lot that is similar in size. [00:59:15] It has a house and it has a garage [00:59:17] with a mother-in-law apartment up on top of it. [00:59:21] And it appears that there is a piece of that lot taken out [00:59:26] and there is yet a third structure [00:59:28] that is on that with a part of the others. [00:59:31] So this doesn't change the makeup [00:59:34] of the neighborhood at all, just for what it's worth. [00:59:38] And I did not know that there were any mother-in-law [00:59:41] apartments in that section, but they're there. [00:59:44] And they've got, let's say there's three residences [00:59:50] on one parcel that is literally catty corner [00:59:55] across the alley from this. [01:00:00] property. So with that, thank you for making a motion. Did you have anything [01:00:08] else you wanted to? Not until we get a second, if we do. Okay. I'll second. For purposes of this, we [01:00:15] have a motion and a second to the amendment? Right. I think in compliance with our quasi-judicial [01:00:21] obligation to only look at the facts of the case, I believe the staff has [01:00:27] indicated support of the variance. Or did you say that backwards? The staff did [01:00:33] not support the variance. It did not meet the hardship test in our code of ordinances. So I think that your [01:00:39] very generalized logic based on the hardship of the 50-foot lot is what [01:00:48] we're hanging our hat on. So I'm gonna hang my hat on that. I think [01:00:53] discussion as to what we might do in the future or changing zoning laws is [01:00:57] probably just sort of side note to it because we've got to stay to the facts. [01:01:02] But I'll support your logic and I am going to hang my hat on it. Thank you. [01:01:12] We just definitely need to address our zoning laws coming to the future. And here we are talking [01:01:16] about someone that's spending a lot of money on a garage to look nice on their [01:01:22] lot. That's really not, you know, imposing anything on anyone else. And we're [01:01:27] telling people they got to get off the street and build a driveway. Well, this [01:01:31] guy's building a whole garage to put his cars in and make it look nice. And, you [01:01:36] know, now we're giving him a hard time, you know, because of a couple feet. So, I [01:01:40] mean, it goes back to we need to address our zoning. Deputy Mayor? Mr. Romanelli, [01:01:47] appears the mayor does not agree with you. And it's just he makes a good [01:01:53] argument and it comes down to our zoning. I will also support the variance. Mr. [01:02:00] Davis? Just a figure. If it's 25 feet, he's gonna use six of it. So he's still [01:02:06] gonna have setback of, you know, 18 feet or some number. Is that correct? [01:02:11] Yes. He's using 21 feet. He'll have 21 feet. Oh, okay. I thought it was six. Okay. 21 feet. [01:02:19] Yeah, I'll support it then. 21 feet. I'm not taking it to the property line or ten [01:02:26] feet or six feet or something. It's setback as far as you reasonably can. [01:02:32] The garage is only 25 feet deep. Apparently the guy's got a pickup truck, [01:02:40] which I got rid of mine, but I can appreciate trying to park anything in [01:02:46] there. It's just, it's tough. So, any further discussion? All those in favor, [01:03:01] please signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Like sign. Motion passes. Next, discussion of [01:03:08] allowing animals in city parks. This agenda item was brought to you by Mr.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 13.b
Discussion on Allowing Animals in City Parks
tabledCouncil discussed a citizen request to allow dogs in the James E. Grape Reserve, the city's only nature preserve. Staff recommended continuing to prohibit dogs, citing wildlife concerns, lack of staffing, and dog waste issues on the boardwalk. After two motions failed for lack of a second (one to accept staff recommendation, one to allow dogs on six-foot leashes), Council voted to table the matter and send it back to Parks and Recreation and Public Works to explore a possible compromise allowing dogs on the phase three upland trails only.
- motion:Motion to accept staff recommendation to continue prohibiting dogs in the Grape Reserve. (failed)
- motion:Motion to allow dogs in the Grape Preserve on a six-foot leash. (failed)
- motion:Motion to table and send the matter back to Parks and Recreation and Public Works to study a possible compromise (e.g. phase three trails) and return with an aerial view and acreage information. (passed)
Baker RoadCody River ParkJames E. Grape ReserveOrange LakeSims ParkThe Meadows ParkMr. DavisMr. MurphyMrs. JeskeMs. SmithRobertEagle PointJames E. Grape Reserve phase three trailsKey VistaPasco County Code on animals in parksStarkey Park▶ Jump to 1:03:09 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:03:15] and Mrs. Jeske, and their specific request was to consider allowing dogs in [01:03:23] the Grape Reserve, and Ms. Smith has researched this matter and is prepared [01:03:29] to advance a recommendation in that regard. Thank you so much. A citizen [01:03:34] request was received to allow dogs in the James C. Grape Reserve. Attached to [01:03:40] this agenda item, please find the City Code as well as the Pasco County Code on [01:03:45] animals in the parks, and the reason for that Pasco County Code is because it's [01:03:49] actually referenced in the City Code, so I wanted you to to be able to see both. [01:03:53] Dogs are currently permitted in four city parks, Orange Lake, Sims Park, Cody [01:03:59] River Park, and the Meadows Park. Pasco County allows dogs in only one of their [01:04:05] three nature preserves. The one preserve where dogs are allowed, the dogs are [01:04:10] restricted to certain trails, designated trails, and are not allowed in all [01:04:15] areas of the nature preserve. For Pasco County's nature parks, Eagle Point, no [01:04:21] dogs are permitted. In Key Vista, dogs are permitted on a six-foot leash, and in [01:04:27] Starkey Park, dogs are permitted on a six-foot leash, but only on the hiking [01:04:32] and paved trails, and again, in not all areas of that park. And I'd like to note [01:04:36] too, that in further discussion with Pasco County, that Key Vista is a [01:04:40] non-staffed park, and that staff member did note issues without having staff [01:04:46] there that dog owners did allow their dogs to run off leash, and there had been [01:04:51] issues associated with that. The James C. Grape Reserve is the only nature [01:04:56] preserve in our city. The preserve is a non-staffed park. The city does provide [01:05:01] four parks, as I indicated, where dogs are welcome. For these reasons, staff [01:05:06] recommend that dogs remain not to be allowed in the only nature preserve in [01:05:10] our city, the James C. Grape Reserve. Thank you. We'll open it up for public [01:05:15] comment. Seeing no one come forward, bring it back to Council. Move to accept staff [01:05:23] recommendation. Are we voting on this or have a discussion on it? Well, if we have a [01:05:30] second, we can have some discussion. The motion just failed for lack of a second. [01:05:40] We have anybody else wants to jump in? I personally think dogs on [01:05:47] leashes are fine in the Grape Preserve, but I do agree with staff a bit on the [01:05:53] fact that it's because there's no staff in there, it does worry me a little bit [01:05:57] that someone's just going to come start playing Frisbee with their dog out in [01:06:00] the open fields there and things like that, which makes some people [01:06:03] uncomfortable. Some people are scared of dogs due to traumatic occurrences, you [01:06:07] know, they may have had in the past. Some people are scared of certain types of [01:06:10] dogs, certain breeds of dogs, but dogs on leashes, it's one of those things we [01:06:16] just kind of have to try out, I think, and then if we have a lot of negative [01:06:24] feedback, you know, people are going to the Preserve not feeling safe, they've [01:06:27] seen dogs off of leashes, then maybe reassess it, but I personally am [01:06:33] okay with, I think, dogs on leashes in the Preserve myself. Anyone else? Mr. Murphy? I mean, again, back to [01:06:42] I guess, what was the reason why they don't want the dogs on the park? Why is [01:06:49] it set that way for nature, wildlife? Yeah, when the city first developed the [01:06:57] James E. Grape Preserve, and I say developed by, put a roadway into where [01:07:01] you could actually drive into the Preserve, there was research done at that [01:07:05] time to reach out to other nature preserves and see what they do, because [01:07:10] this was the city's first and only one now, and the census that was collected [01:07:16] then was, especially because we have a boardwalk, it's another park that had a [01:07:19] boardwalk, that they did allow dogs in the park. They wished they hadn't, because [01:07:26] as soon as they did, they did see a decrease in wildlife in the park, and [01:07:31] also the boardwalk in particular, that's where people would let their dogs run [01:07:36] off leash. They got a lot of complaints where citizens would be walking and they [01:07:41] would meet, come around a corner and meet a dog. Their concern was that once you [01:07:47] allow dogs, it's really hard to take it back. So we had never had that scenario [01:07:55] before, so that's why we reached out to see what other nature preserves were [01:07:58] doing, and then based on those discussions, that's how we formulated the [01:08:04] ruling for the Great Preserve. Thank you. Mr. Davis? May I add one other thing, too? [01:08:10] Robert, just remind me, thank you. There is also a concern, especially on the [01:08:14] boardwalk, of dog waste. So even if you do clean up after the dog, you're not going [01:08:20] to get all that material off of, especially a boardwalk. [01:08:26] Mr. Davis? Not only do we have parks that allow a dog, we actually have a dog [01:08:33] park, is that correct? Yes. You know, so I think we're offering the public that [01:08:38] chance at this time. I think a lot of things that we do up here are fluid, and at [01:08:44] this time, you know, I kind of support not doing it this time, but as that [01:08:48] park develops, maybe they'll end up being a dog park inside that preserve, you [01:08:53] know. So at this time, I'm not ready for that. Two quick things, if I may. Have you [01:08:57] seen our dog park? Yeah. Yeah, it's not, I mean, it's not really what it [01:09:05] could be, by any means, and I think the purpose of people wanting dogs in the park, [01:09:08] I'm assuming, is they want to be able to walk out in nature along this beautiful, [01:09:12] you know, I've walked through Great Preserve numerous, numerous times with my [01:09:15] family, and to me, it is a good place to walk your dog, but we're just, to comment [01:09:22] on what Smith said, I don't think it is hard to take back. If we try it, and then [01:09:26] we get several reports of dogs running wild, and people don't feel safe, boom, no [01:09:29] more dogs in the preserve. It's as simple as that. So I personally am okay of trying it [01:09:35] out, and because I honestly feel like people have been taking their dogs there, [01:09:40] it just became an issue once the sign went up, right? Or has the sign been up? [01:09:43] It's been some concern pretty much since the preserve had opened, and [01:09:50] mostly it was educating the community, because they weren't, they honestly [01:09:54] didn't realize that dogs weren't permitted there, and then as staff would, [01:09:59] as staff would see it, and inform people, and then we decided to post it so that [01:10:04] that people would be better educated. I guess my message to the public is, if we [01:10:09] approve this, and we allow dogs in Great Preserve, it's going to be up to you as [01:10:13] whether or not that holds, because if you start bringing your dog there, and you let it [01:10:16] run free, and people don't feel safe, I ask those people to come back and [01:10:20] report to us, and like I said, we can, if we do approve this, we can, we can change [01:10:25] it at any time. So it's going to be up to the responsibility of the dog owners as [01:10:28] whether or not this works, if approved. [01:10:37] I'll entertain a motion. Move to allow dogs in the Great Preserve on a six-foot [01:10:44] leash. Do we have a second? Because we couldn't get a second either way. All right, for lack of a second. I've got another idea, but this might go first. There's an [01:11:04] idea. How about we just call it Dog Days Thursday, and just say, bring your dog [01:11:10] out on Thursdays, and try it for one day a week, and at least we can control it. I [01:11:16] mean, if you want to have somebody have a chance to walk their dog out there, but [01:11:20] you know, endangered species, wildlife, that, you know, that's the purpose of that. [01:11:25] And, you know, the gentleman who made the request, I'm believing, not that it [01:11:30] matters, but wasn't a city resident, or was he? I mean, city of New Port Richey? [01:11:40] On Baker Road? That's the point. Yeah, right. So we have had this discussion [01:11:46] often. You know, if we've got a problem with our dog park across the river, we [01:11:52] ought to address that too. I mean, so it's a shame to want to let somebody walk [01:11:58] their dog somewhere else because we aren't happy with the dog park. Maybe [01:12:03] that ought to be a capital improvement discussion too. But I was trying to give [01:12:09] him one day a week to walk his dog out there, but I don't know that we're going [01:12:14] to come to any consensus. If that's a motion, do we have a second? And you [01:12:21] wouldn't even do one day? I just think it's going to turn into like, uh-oh, I forgot [01:12:25] it was Thursday, sorry. Right. You know, I just don't think that that would work. [01:12:29] It's the same thing. It comes down to the responsibility of the dog owner. [01:12:33] Somebody's got to be able to come up with a motion that somebody will second. We don't have to have a motion. [01:12:38] We could just move on. [01:12:44] Do you see a lot to speak? Why don't you come up? We seem to be at a... [01:12:51] Yeah, well, we also need to consider that a lot of people need to exercise more, and everybody loves to walk their dog. [01:13:02] And this is an area that is just... Well, you guys, I live near the park. Every other car has a dog in it. [01:13:13] So this is kind of a moot discussion for one, but people want to walk their dog, [01:13:22] and they want to get exercise. And the second thing is, does it really disrupt [01:13:30] the wildlife there? I really doubt that. There's also a compromise. There's two sets of trails in the park. [01:13:44] There are the trails around the boardwalk, which is problematic when people have a dog, [01:13:54] and the adjoining trail that goes along the river. And then there's something called the phase three trails, [01:14:03] which are upland from that. That area is much less populated in terms of use. [01:14:16] The forest is much thinner. There's less wildlife. So a compromise might be to allow walking on the phase three trails, [01:14:27] and not on the boardwalk and the riverwalk. [01:14:31] I'd like to give that idea back to Parks and Recreation and Public Works and have them look it over and decide that there might be an area out there. [01:14:49] Good idea. And when you do that, when you come back to us, can you please have an aerial view of the park and where the trail is [01:14:57] compared to the trail with the boardwalk so we can have a visual and go... [01:15:00] from there. Sure. I take that to be a motion to table it and send it back to. Second. And [01:15:07] all those in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, likes aye. I don't think [01:15:11] we've ever tabled and sent back two different things in one meeting before. I don't think [01:15:15] we've ever had two different motions opposing to table out a second. I mean there's five [01:15:21] of us, how do you have two different motions and nobody gets a second? None of an aerial [01:15:28] because we didn't have the answer. Maybe the staff will bring us a better answer. Not only [01:15:32] an aerial, but you know, if we got I think 80 acres there plus that new section, how [01:15:37] much we're actually talking about acre-wise? Correct, absolutely. I made that note. I heard [01:15:45] somebody mention about possible new developments, so we'll include that in both. Very good. [01:15:50] Thank you very much. Next item is Resolution 2019-10. Resolution number 2019-10, a resolution
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 13.c
Resolution No. 2019-10: Declaration of Human Rights Policy
approvedCouncil adopted Resolution No. 2019-10, a Declaration of Human Rights Policy affirming the City's opposition to discrimination in housing, employment, and public accommodations based on 10 protected characteristics including age, color, disability, gender, marital status, national origin, race, religion, gender identity/expression, and sexual orientation. Public commenters from Pasco Pride urged the Council to go further and adopt an enforceable Human Rights Ordinance (HRO), but the Council passed the resolution unanimously as a statement of policy.
Ord. Resolution No. 2019-10
- motion:Motion to approve Resolution No. 2019-10, Declaration of Human Rights Policy. (passed)
7940 Augusta BoulevardSims ParkEquality FloridaPasco PrideCharlie RussoCouncilman MurphyMindy WashingtonMr. AltmanMr. DavisMs. MannsDeclaration of Human Rights PolicyHuman Rights Ordinance (HRO)Resolution No. 2019-10Super Playground▶ Jump to 1:15:55 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:15:57] of the City Council of the City of New Port Richey, Florida, encouraging the preservation [01:16:00] of human rights for all people and condemning discrimination in employment, housing, and [01:16:04] public accommodations based upon the immutable or apparent characteristics of any person. [01:16:10] Ms. Manns? Mayor, this item was prepared as a result of direction that the Council provided [01:16:20] to the staff at their meeting on June 18th, 2019. As the city attorney has indicated, [01:16:31] the areas addressed in the resolution include housing, employment, and accommodation. It [01:16:40] affirms a policy of the city that discrimination is contrary to the policy of the city and [01:16:48] it establishes 10 protections, age, color, disability, gender, marital status, natural [01:16:58] origin, race, religion, gender, identity expression, and sexual orientation are all included. Thank [01:17:08] you. And we'll open it up for public comment. Hello, Mindy Washington, 7940 Augusta Boulevard, [01:17:30] which is actually in the City of Hudson. However, I am the parent of a New Port Richey student. [01:17:37] I am a longtime resident. I helped build the original Super Playground, so I've been [01:17:43] around quite a while, Mr. Altman. Thank you for the resolution. However, we're hearing [01:17:57] from people that you are ticketing them for parking on their own property, but my son [01:18:06] could be sent out of a public building if somebody doesn't like the pride shirt he's [01:18:14] wearing and the city is only willing to say, don't do that, be nice. It's not good enough. [01:18:24] It's not good enough. You have a huge segment of population that is not covered by an actual [01:18:35] ordinance. You have visitors to this city. This is a beautiful place to visit, but if [01:18:41] people are going to come and be yelled at by protesters, see signs condemning them to [01:18:49] hell, they're not going to come and visit, and they're going to tell their friends. So [01:18:56] with all due respect, this resolution isn't enough. Thank you. [01:19:01] Thank you. Anyone else? [01:19:25] Hi, my name is Charlie Russo. I'm on the board of Pasco Pride. I don't live in the city, but I [01:19:30] do represent Pasco Pride here today. We do agree that the resolution is beautifully written, [01:19:37] is exactly what we want for our city and for our county, and we're very grateful that the [01:19:41] city has the same vision of an equal future that we do, and that you took the time to [01:19:46] prepare this. Again, we don't think the resolution goes far enough. We consider nominal support [01:19:53] is not enough. It wasn't enough to protect women or people of color or religious minorities [01:19:58] or people with disabilities. That's why they were made into a legally protected class. [01:20:03] We've seen discrimination happen, maybe not in a business level, but the point is not [01:20:08] to say, this has happened, we need to address it. It would be much better to prevent something [01:20:13] from happening as your LGBT population continues to grow and operate in the city. [01:20:21] The city council has made some valid critiques of our initial plan that was introduced, and [01:20:26] we've repeatedly offered to help create a simplified HRO that works for the small city, [01:20:31] and we would like to continue to do that. We're hopeful that the city will consider [01:20:35] building off the concepts of this resolution to create something enforceable. Sixty percent [01:20:40] of Floridians are covered by HROs at the city and county level. These statutes are provided [01:20:46] by Equality Florida. We're not asking for anything out of the ordinary, we're just asking [01:20:51] for equal protections. So that was the statement prepared by Pasco Pride. I have my own personal [01:20:56] statement that I think is kind of interesting. I thought it was funny that one person who [01:21:01] doesn't live in the city, which, I don't live in the city, but again, I represent an organization [01:21:06] that operates in the city, brought to the attention of the council that they couldn't [01:21:10] take their dog into a park, and you guys sat here and debated it and thought about it, [01:21:16] and he can walk his dog on the street, he can walk his dog other places, and you guys [01:21:21] are trying to find a solution, but when it comes to people's rights to protect them, [01:21:28] we can't get you to make a policy that says if you discriminate, you're going to face [01:21:33] a penalty. You know, we're talking about people, human dignity, and I thought, how telling [01:21:40] is that, that we give more consideration to whether dogs can go in a park or not, to whether [01:21:45] your citizens are protected as they visit your city. That's my personal comment. Thank [01:21:49] you. Thank you. Anyone else? Seeing no one else come forward, I'm going to bring it back [01:21:57] to council. I just have to say for the record, I'm offended by your analogy right there. [01:22:01] I think that's not even close, but we've had this discussion whether or not we are in favor [01:22:07] of an ordinance or a resolution to protect all of our residents and visitors regarding [01:22:12] discrimination, and I thought we had a very good discussion, which is what led us to this. [01:22:19] I move approval of the resolution. I move second it with a comment. Any to the [01:22:25] maker? No, I think that every item at rest stays at rest, and once in motion, an item [01:22:35] is in motion, so this is putting your item in motion, and I'm happy to be able to say [01:22:41] that we have at least what seemed to be a unanimous consent to do this. Time marches [01:22:50] on and we'll see what happens next. Mr. Davis. Yeah, and when this was brought up a couple [01:22:57] weeks ago or whatever, there was discussion that the city attorney had addressed some [01:23:05] of the complaints that were brought up and said that this writing an ordinance would [01:23:10] not actually apply to any one of their examples. Am I correct in that statement? Yes. So, I [01:23:18] think this is supportive of, and if it really becomes a problem and our attorney sees that [01:23:24] we should address it, then I think we'll take that step, but at this time, I'm happy with [01:23:28] the resolution. Deputy Mayor. Yes, I'm going to support this, but once again, it's for [01:23:34] all citizens of Newport, and it's a statement we're making. It's a statement we've been [01:23:38] showing over the years on how this council views our residents and our guests, so now [01:23:44] it's in writing for all residents and visitors of New Port Richey. Councilman Murphy. No, [01:23:51] we've talked about it, vetted it, they're legal, so let's move forward with it. And [01:23:59] I have said to any number of individuals, and publicly as well, that I believe that [01:24:09] simply don't care who you live with, who you love, that's not my business. People who come [01:24:21] to the City of New Port Richey, that want to be a part of the New Port Richey, to make [01:24:26] it a better place for everyone, as far as I'm concerned, you are welcome here. We want [01:24:34] and encourage all of our residents to come in and make this a better place. The people [01:24:45] who espouse hatred, that scream and yell at people, and use megaphones, they're welcome [01:24:53] to go somewhere else. We don't need that. We've got, I think, a very open and accepting [01:25:01] community. It has been much more than I would have thought. I was, quite frankly, absolutely [01:25:13] amazed last October when Pasco Pride had their first event in Sims Park, and the downtown [01:25:21] was absolutely festered with rainbow flags. They were everywhere. Because this is an open [01:25:34] and accepting community, this resolution puts the City Council on the record, saying basically [01:25:42] the facts that I think have been on the ground for some time, but we are open. We are accepting. [01:25:54] The people that come here, that want to help make a better place out of this city, we're [01:26:00] all for it. If someone comes to the City and looks for a job, I would hope that they would [01:26:12] the hiring individuals would look at whether or not that person can do the job that they're [01:26:19] applying for. Nothing else matters. It's important that they be able to do the job. That's it. [01:26:32] I would hope that any of our employers in New Port Richey would follow these same general [01:26:39] guidelines. That if somebody comes to them looking for a job, I don't care who they're [01:26:45] married to, and the employer shouldn't either. That's not the point. The point is, can they [01:26:50] do the job? And are they willing to work hard? With that criteria, I welcome everybody. The [01:27:01] folks from Pasco Pride, the folks that are straight that have been married for decades [01:27:06] like I have, we're all welcome here. I think that's the point that is being made by this [01:27:17] resolution, saying we're taking a position. We don't believe that it's right to discriminate [01:27:25] against people solely because of who they love. That has nothing to do with anything. [01:27:33] It's a matter of everybody, let's work together. Let's make this a really great place. We know [01:27:41] that we can be even better today than we were yesterday. We're going to keep moving forward. [01:27:49] This puts the City Council on record, saying that that's the case. It's formal. It's written. [01:27:56] This is who we are. Off my soapbox. Anybody else? In that case, all those in favor, please [01:28:09] signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like sign. Motion passes. Next is professional
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 13.d
Professional Services Agreement w/Stroud Engineering Consultants Inc. RE: Sims Park Boat Ramp and Restroom Improvement Project
approvedCouncil approved a professional services agreement with Stroud Engineering Consultants Inc. for $81,000 to provide design, structural engineering, bid, and construction phase services for the Sims Park Boat Ramp and Restroom Improvement Project, including a new restroom, seawall cap, sidewalk extension, and dredging of rocks near the ramp. Councilman Allman urged that the CRA consider expanding the boat ramp facility long-term given increasing density and parking pressures.
- motion:Approve the professional services agreement with Stroud Engineering Consultants Inc. for the Sims Park Boat Ramp and Restroom Improvement Project at a cost of $81,000. (passed)
Sims Park Boat RampStroud Engineering Consultants Inc.AllmanJordan LongMannsMs. SmithCRAHaciendaSims Park Boat Ramp and Restroom Improvement Project▶ Jump to 1:28:15 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:28:16] services agreement with Stroud Engineering. Yes, sir. Mr. Mayor, Ms. Smith is prepared [01:28:24] this evening to make a recommendation to you for this project. [01:28:31] Thank you. The request before you tonight is to approve the professional services of [01:28:36] Stroud Engineering consultants for the Sims Park boat ramp and restroom improvement project. [01:28:43] Stroud Engineering does appear on the approved list of engineering firms that the City uses [01:28:49] for various projects. The fee is for design, structural engineering, bid, and construction [01:28:55] phase services for the installation of a new restroom facility, seawall cap, and sidewalk [01:29:04] extension of the concrete boat ramp, and the dredging of the large rocks that appear near [01:29:10] the end of the ramp. The cost for these professional services from Stroud Engineering is $81,000, [01:29:17] which is within the industry standards of 12% of the projected project construction [01:29:23] cost, and it's before you tonight with a recommendation for approval. [01:29:27] Thank you. We'll open it up for public comment. Seeing no one come forward, bring it back [01:29:32] to Council. Move for approval. Second. To the Mayor? Second. Nothing. Deputy Mayor? [01:29:40] No comments. Mr. Allman? I've just had some discussion with the City Manager about whatever [01:29:49] capital improvements that might be made there, making sure they're consistent with our long-term [01:29:53] capital improvement plans, and I would personally like to see, considering all of the [01:30:00] Parking issues that boat trailers have and the length of which our remote parking lot is, [01:30:08] and then add 90 units and retail in between that and the Hacienda opening. [01:30:17] I hope that we can have the CRA look very strongly at the asset that is our boat ramp [01:30:27] and the ability for us to make that work in a city that's increasing its density. [01:30:32] I think that there's probably a larger project in mind, but given the cost, [01:30:36] I wouldn't want to estimate the cost any higher than the $600,000 [01:30:41] or whatever it is that you're estimating the cost of the improvements that you're proposing. [01:30:46] So I'm in favor of it. [01:30:48] I do hope that as this develops, we can look at expansion of the boat ramp facility. [01:30:57] Thank you, and I just wish that somebody at the city had done this 20 years ago, [01:31:01] back when I had a boat and used the ramp. [01:31:04] It's definitely needed. [01:31:06] The rocks have been there pretty much forever, [01:31:09] and at the wrong time you're not going to get your boat in or out of there [01:31:14] potentially doing damage to the kicker on your boat. [01:31:19] If there's no further discussion, all those in favor, please signify by saying aye. [01:31:23] Aye. [01:31:24] Opposed, like sign. Motion passes. [01:31:27] Next, we have a special treat, an economic development promotional video. [01:31:32] Ms. Manns. [01:31:33] Thank you, Mr. Mayor. [01:31:34] Earlier this year, I commissioned a video to be produced for the city [01:31:40] for economic development and quality of life purposes. [01:31:43] I wasn't expecting the producer of that video to be in attendance this evening, [01:31:48] but we're very fortunate to have him here this evening. [01:31:51] Mr. Jordan Long is in the back of the room, [01:31:55] and we're going to show you the video that was produced. [01:32:10] Oh, turn it up, Nick.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 13.e
Economic Development Promotional Video
discussedStaff presented a new economic development promotional video focused on downtown New Port Richey establishments, produced with partner JL Video. Council praised the video's high quality and discussed its use at Sims Park and on social media, including the ability for featured businesses to boost it on Facebook. No formal action was taken.
Sims ParkJL VideoCharlesDavisJordanMs. MannMurphyDowntown New Port Richey promotionEconomic Development Promotional Video▶ Jump to 1:32:27 in the videoShow transcriptHide transcript
Auto-transcript · machine-generated, may contain errors
[01:32:40] Turn it up. [01:33:10] Turn it up. [01:33:40] Turn it up. [01:34:11] Turn it up. [01:34:18] Turn it up. [01:34:24] Turn it up. [01:34:30] Turn it up. [01:34:36] Turn it up. [01:34:40] I think I just gained weight watching all the food and ice cream and sandwiches and everything. [01:34:46] I'm feeling a little tipsy, Mayor. [01:34:49] The focus of this video, as you can tell, is on our downtown establishments, [01:34:54] and that's why we featured so much food and liquid refreshments as well, [01:35:03] and indicated in the end of the video the names of those in our downtown area. [01:35:11] It will be used at Sims Park for promotional purposes [01:35:16] to get the visitors to the park and to the downtown area, [01:35:21] as well as a myriad of other social media and promotion concepts that we plan to pursue. [01:35:31] I think it will be the first of several videos, [01:35:35] and we've enjoyed working with our partner, JL Video, [01:35:39] and I hope that you'll appreciate his work as much as we do. [01:35:45] Thank you. [01:35:46] Deputy Mayor. [01:35:47] I guess a question for Jordan and Ms. Mann. [01:35:49] So we're going to put this on Facebook, obviously. [01:35:51] If one of the businesses that's in the video wants to boost the video [01:35:55] and pay to boost that on their own Facebook page, are they able to come on up to the mic, Jordan, [01:36:00] so people can hear? [01:36:01] Great job, by the way. [01:36:02] You must love what you do because you're very good at it. [01:36:04] Are they able to do so? [01:36:08] Hi, Council. [01:36:09] Yes, they're able to boost it. [01:36:10] They can share it on their business pages, and they can click Boost to Facebook, [01:36:15] and they can spend as much money as they'd like to get the exposure that they desire. [01:36:20] Thank you. [01:36:21] Other comments? [01:36:23] Just to see the high quality of the video, it's very impressive [01:36:30] and as professional as if it could be Las Vegas. [01:36:34] I mean, it really makes our city stand out in a good light. [01:36:39] And I don't know, I didn't get a reaction from the crowd. [01:36:43] Did you all enjoy it? [01:36:46] Yeah? [01:36:48] Standing ovation. [01:36:50] No, it was great, really wonderful. [01:36:54] Mr. Murphy? [01:36:55] Yeah, I liked it. [01:36:56] It really did good for highlighting our downtown stuff and what we're doing, [01:36:59] so it would be nice to get that out there and have something out there showing positive in New Port Richey. [01:37:03] So thank you. [01:37:05] Charles, what did you think? [01:37:08] I liked it. [01:37:11] Mr. Davis? [01:37:12] I'm looking forward to selling this town. [01:37:14] I mean, I've been talking about that for six years. [01:37:17] The best part I heard was first of a number of videos, so I think it's a good first start. [01:37:24] Ice cream is my weakness. [01:37:26] Yeah, and I can't believe they let off with that. [01:37:31] Yeah. [01:37:33] For any of us that have ever been on a diet, what a way to start the video. [01:37:38] It was great. [01:37:42] Very good. [01:37:44] Thank you again. [01:37:46] I'm going to go to communications.
This text was generated automatically from the meeting video. It is not a verbatim or official record. For exact wording, consult the video or the city clerk.
- 14Communications▶ 1:37:47
- 15Adjournment▶ 1:52:46